These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24754220)

  • 21. The influence of word frequency on the transposed-phoneme priming effect.
    Dufour S; Grainger J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Aug; 82(6):2785-2792. PubMed ID: 32435972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Spoken word recognition and serial recall of words from components in the phonological network.
    Siew CS; Vitevitch MS
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Mar; 42(3):394-410. PubMed ID: 26301962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The spread of the phonological neighborhood influences spoken word recognition.
    Vitevitch MS
    Mem Cognit; 2007 Jan; 35(1):166-75. PubMed ID: 17533890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Influences of spoken word planning on speech recognition.
    Roelofs A; Ozdemir R; Levelt WJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Sep; 33(5):900-13. PubMed ID: 17723068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The role of additional processing time and lexical constraint in spoken word recognition.
    LoCasto PC; Connine CM; Patterson D
    Lang Speech; 2007; 50(Pt 1):53-75. PubMed ID: 17518103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Dissociative contributions of semantic and lexical-phonological information to immediate recognition.
    Nishiyama R
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Mar; 39(2):642-8. PubMed ID: 22774851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Recognition of spoken words: semantic effects in lexical access.
    Wurm LH; Vakoch DA; Seaman SR
    Lang Speech; 2004; 47(Pt 2):175-204. PubMed ID: 15581191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Lexical effects on recognition of the NU-6 words by monolingual and bilingual listeners.
    Shi LF
    Int J Audiol; 2014 May; 53(5):318-25. PubMed ID: 24484213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Observing neighborhood effects without neighbors.
    Suárez L; Tan SH; Yap MJ; Goh WD
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2011 Jun; 18(3):605-11. PubMed ID: 21380585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Phonemes: Lexical access and beyond.
    Kazanina N; Bowers JS; Idsardi W
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Apr; 25(2):560-585. PubMed ID: 28875456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Processing of no-release variants in connected speech.
    LoCasto PC; Connine CM
    Lang Speech; 2011 Jun; 54(Pt 2):181-97. PubMed ID: 21848079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Activation of multiple phoneme associates of graphemes in visual word recognition.
    Lange M
    Brain Lang; 2002; 81(1-3):610-20. PubMed ID: 12081426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Do postonset segments define a lexical neighborhood?
    Newman RS; Sawusch JR; Luce PA
    Mem Cognit; 2005 Sep; 33(6):941-60. PubMed ID: 16496717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Early use of phonetic information in spoken word recognition: lexical stress drives eye movements immediately.
    Reinisch E; Jesse A; McQueen JM
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Apr; 63(4):772-83. PubMed ID: 19691004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The effect of word learning on the perception of non-native consonant sequences.
    Davidson L; Shaw J; Adams T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Dec; 122(6):3697-709. PubMed ID: 18247777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The developmental turnpoint of orthographic consistency effects in speech recognition.
    Ventura P; Kolinsky R; Pattamadilok C; Morais J
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2008 Jun; 100(2):135-45. PubMed ID: 18328498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Phonological decoding or direct access? Regularity effects in lexical decisions of Grade 3 and 4 children.
    Schmalz X; Marinus E; Castles A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(2):338-46. PubMed ID: 22905801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Not just a function of function words: Distal speech rate influences perception of prosodically weak syllables.
    Baese-Berk MM; Dilley LC; Henry MJ; Vinke L; Banzina E
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Feb; 81(2):571-589. PubMed ID: 30488190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Inhibitory phonetic priming: Where does the effect come from?
    Dufour S; Frauenfelder UH
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(1):180-96. PubMed ID: 26041020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Sink positive: linguistic experience with th substitutions influences nonnative word recognition.
    Hanulíková A; Weber A
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Apr; 74(3):613-29. PubMed ID: 22207311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.