These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24754483)

  • 21. Maternal and infant outcome after caesarean section without recorded medical indication: findings from a Swedish case-control study.
    Karlström A; Lindgren H; Hildingsson I
    BJOG; 2013 Mar; 120(4):479-86; discussion 486. PubMed ID: 23316937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Maternal morbidity and mortality associated with elective Caesarean delivery at a university hospital in Nigeria.
    Oladapo OT; Lamina MA; Sule-Odu AO
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2007 Apr; 47(2):110-4. PubMed ID: 17355299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Health-related quality of life five years after birth of the first child.
    Carlander AK; Andolf E; Edman G; Wiklund I
    Sex Reprod Healthc; 2015 Jun; 6(2):101-7. PubMed ID: 25998878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Physical activities during pregnancy and type of delivery in nulliparae.
    Ko YL; Chen CP; Lin PC
    Eur J Sport Sci; 2016; 16(3):374-80. PubMed ID: 25837804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Ultrasonographic occiput position in early labour in the prediction of caesarean section.
    Akmal S; Kametas N; Tsoi E; Howard R; Nicolaides KH
    BJOG; 2004 Jun; 111(6):532-6. PubMed ID: 15198779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Expectation and experiences of childbirth in primiparae with caesarean section.
    Wiklund I; Edman G; Ryding EL; Andolf E
    BJOG; 2008 Feb; 115(3):324-31. PubMed ID: 18190368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effects of prolonged second stage, method of birth, timing of caesarean section and other obstetric risk factors on postnatal urinary incontinence: an Australian nulliparous cohort study.
    Brown SJ; Gartland D; Donath S; MacArthur C
    BJOG; 2011 Jul; 118(8):991-1000. PubMed ID: 21489125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Is there an association between psychological stress and request for caesarian section?].
    Halvorsen L; Nerum H; Øian P; Sørlie T
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2008 Jun; 128(12):1388-91. PubMed ID: 18552899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Short-term maternal and neonatal outcomes by mode of delivery. A case-controlled study.
    Benedetto C; Marozio L; Prandi G; Roccia A; Blefari S; Fabris C
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2007 Nov; 135(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 17126475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Prenatal risk factors for Caesarean section. Analyses of the ALSPAC cohort of 12,944 women in England.
    Patel RR; Peters TJ; Murphy DJ;
    Int J Epidemiol; 2005 Apr; 34(2):353-67. PubMed ID: 15659468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Caesarean section for the dead baby--an unhappy reality.
    Mukherj J; Kamilya G; Bhattacharyya SK
    J Indian Med Assoc; 2007 Jun; 105(6):316, 318-9. PubMed ID: 18232176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. When is fetal macrosomia (> or = 4500 g) an indication for caesarean section?
    Mikulandra F; Perisa M; Stojnić E
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1996; 118(8):441-7. PubMed ID: 8794545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A population-based cohort study of the effect of Caesarean section on subsequent fertility.
    Gurol-Urganci I; Cromwell DA; Mahmood TA; van der Meulen JH; Templeton A
    Hum Reprod; 2014 Jun; 29(6):1320-6. PubMed ID: 24781430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The burden of caesarean section refusal in a developing country setting.
    Chigbu CO; Iloabachie GC
    BJOG; 2007 Oct; 114(10):1261-5. PubMed ID: 17877678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A comparative study of sleep quality between pregnant and nonpregnant Taiwanese women.
    Ko SH; Chang SC; Chen CH
    J Nurs Scholarsh; 2010 Mar; 42(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 20487183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Non-elective caesarean delivery due to ineffective uterine contractility or due to obstructed labour in relation to maternal body mass index.
    Cedergren MI
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2009 Aug; 145(2):163-6. PubMed ID: 19525054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Maternal and fetal outcomes following unplanned conversion to general anesthetic at elective cesarean section.
    Aiken CE; Aiken AR; Cole JC; Brockelsby JC; Bamber JH
    J Perinatol; 2015 Sep; 35(9):695-9. PubMed ID: 26067473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Trial of labour in twin pregnancies: a retrospective cohort study.
    de Castro H; Haas J; Schiff E; Sivan E; Yinon Y; Barzilay E
    BJOG; 2016 May; 123(6):940-5. PubMed ID: 26228895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labour after previous caesarean section in sub-Saharan countries.
    Kaboré C; Chaillet N; Kouanda S; Bujold E; Traoré M; Dumont A
    BJOG; 2016 Dec; 123(13):2147-2155. PubMed ID: 26374554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A comparative study of the experience of childbirth between women who preferred and had a caesarean section and women who preferred and had a vaginal birth.
    Karlström A; Nystedt A; Hildingsson I
    Sex Reprod Healthc; 2011 Aug; 2(3):93-9. PubMed ID: 21742287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.