BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24754689)

  • 1. Knowledge and attitudes regarding the personally controlled electronic health record: an Australian national survey.
    Lehnbom EC; Brien JE; McLachlan AJ
    Intern Med J; 2014 Apr; 44(4):406-9. PubMed ID: 24754689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A pilot study on the views of elderly regional Australians of personally controlled electronic health records.
    Kerai P; Wood P; Martin M
    Int J Med Inform; 2014 Mar; 83(3):201-9. PubMed ID: 24382474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A qualitative study of Australians' opinions about personally controlled electronic health records.
    Lehnbom EC; McLachlan A; Brien JA
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2012; 178():105-10. PubMed ID: 22797027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Australian general public's perceptions of having a personally controlled electronic health record (PCEHR).
    Andrews L; Gajanayake R; Sahama T
    Int J Med Inform; 2014 Dec; 83(12):889-900. PubMed ID: 25200198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Positive beliefs and privacy concerns shape the future for the Personally Controlled Electronic Health Record.
    Lehnbom EC; Douglas HE; Makeham MA
    Intern Med J; 2016 Jan; 46(1):108-11. PubMed ID: 26813902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Attitudes of pregnant women towards personally controlled electronic, hospital-held, and patient-held medical record systems: a survey study.
    Quinlivan JA; Lyons S; Petersen RW
    Telemed J E Health; 2014 Sep; 20(9):810-5. PubMed ID: 25046543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Current patient and healthcare worker attitudes to eHealth and the personally controlled electronic health record in major hospitals.
    Armani R; Mitchell LE; Allen-Graham J; Heriot NR; Kotsimbos T; Wilson JW
    Intern Med J; 2016 Jun; 46(6):717-22. PubMed ID: 27040359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Australia's personally controlled electronic health record and primary healthcare: generating a framework for implementation and evaluation.
    Almond H; Cummings E; Turner P
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2013; 188():1-6. PubMed ID: 23823280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ethical questions must be considered for electronic health records.
    Spriggs M; Arnold MV; Pearce CM; Fry C
    J Med Ethics; 2012 Sep; 38(9):535-9. PubMed ID: 22573881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Patient perspectives on a personally controlled electronic health record used in regional Australia.
    Hanna L; Gill SD; Newstead L; Hawkins M; Osborne RH
    Health Inf Manag; 2017 Jan; 46(1):42-48. PubMed ID: 27486184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Personally Controlled Electronic Health Record (PCEHR) for Adults with Severe Communication Impairments: Findings of Pilot Research.
    Hemsley B; Georgiou A; Balandin S; Carter R; Hill S; Higgins I; Van Vliet P; McCarthy S
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2015; 214():100-6. PubMed ID: 26210425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Attitudes of Australian nurses to information technology in the workplace: a national survey.
    Eley R; Soar J; Buikstra E; Fallon T; Hegney D
    Comput Inform Nurs; 2009; 27(2):114-21. PubMed ID: 21685837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A personally controlled electronic health record for Australia.
    Pearce C; Bainbridge M
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2014; 21(4):707-13. PubMed ID: 24650635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A maturity model to deliver a national shared medications system, options, practice, and pitfalls.
    Bainbridge M; Pearce C; Taggart R
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2013; 192():1070. PubMed ID: 23920844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Demographic characteristics of Australian health consumers who were early registrants for opt-in personally controlled electronic health records.
    Torrens E; Walker SM
    Health Inf Manag; 2017 Sep; 46(3):127-133. PubMed ID: 28537210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Patient and public attitudes towards informed consent models and levels of awareness of Electronic Health Records in the UK.
    Riordan F; Papoutsi C; Reed JE; Marston C; Bell D; Majeed A
    Int J Med Inform; 2015 Apr; 84(4):237-47. PubMed ID: 25649841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. eHealth-as-a-Service (eHaaS): a data-driven decision making approach in Australian context.
    Black A; Sahama T; Gajanayake R
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2014; 205():915-9. PubMed ID: 25160321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Realist review to inform development of the electronic advance care plan for the personally controlled electronic health record in Australia.
    Skinner I; Smith C; Jaffray L
    Telemed J E Health; 2014 Nov; 20(11):1042-8. PubMed ID: 25290057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The introduction of the national e-health record into Australian community pharmacy practice: pharmacists' perceptions.
    Mooranian A; Emmerton L; Hattingh L
    Int J Pharm Pract; 2013 Dec; 21(6):405-12. PubMed ID: 23560554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Patients' attitudes towards sharing their health information.
    Whiddett R; Hunter I; Engelbrecht J; Handy J
    Int J Med Inform; 2006 Jul; 75(7):530-41. PubMed ID: 16198142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.