158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24754741)
1. Comparison of search strategies in systematic reviews of adverse effects to other systematic reviews.
Golder S; Loke YK; Zorzela L
Health Info Libr J; 2014 Jun; 31(2):92-105. PubMed ID: 24754741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Methodological developments in searching for studies for systematic reviews: past, present and future?
Lefebvre C; Glanville J; Wieland LS; Coles B; Weightman AL
Syst Rev; 2013 Sep; 2():78. PubMed ID: 24066664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Poor reporting and inadequate searches were apparent in systematic reviews of adverse effects.
Golder S; Loke Y; McIntosh HM
J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 May; 61(5):440-8. PubMed ID: 18394536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A simplified search strategy for identifying randomised controlled trials for systematic reviews of health care interventions: a comparison with more exhaustive strategies.
Royle P; Waugh N
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2005 Jul; 5():23. PubMed ID: 16042789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Optimizing literature search in systematic reviews - are MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL enough for identifying effect studies within the area of musculoskeletal disorders?
Aagaard T; Lund H; Juhl C
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Nov; 16(1):161. PubMed ID: 27875992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Identifying systematic reviews of the adverse effects of health care interventions.
Golder S; McIntosh HM; Loke Y
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2006 May; 6():22. PubMed ID: 16681854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Search strategies to identify diagnostic accuracy studies in MEDLINE and EMBASE.
Beynon R; Leeflang MM; McDonald S; Eisinga A; Mitchell RL; Whiting P; Glanville JM
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 Sep; 2013(9):MR000022. PubMed ID: 24022476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Overview: comprehensive and carefully constructed strategies are required when conducting searches for adverse effects data.
Golder S; Peryer G; Loke YK
J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Sep; 113():36-43. PubMed ID: 31150833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Search strategies to identify observational studies in MEDLINE and Embase.
Li L; Smith HE; Atun R; Tudor Car L
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2019 Mar; 3(3):MR000041. PubMed ID: 30860595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Some improvements are apparent in identifying adverse effects in systematic reviews from 1994 to 2011.
Golder S; Loke YK; Zorzela L
J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Mar; 66(3):253-60. PubMed ID: 23347849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. No consensus exists on search reporting methods for systematic reviews.
Sampson M; McGowan J; Tetzlaff J; Cogo E; Moher D
J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Aug; 61(8):748-54. PubMed ID: 18586178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Search and selection methodology of systematic reviews in orthodontics (2000-2004).
Flores-Mir C; Major MP; Major PW
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Aug; 130(2):214-7. PubMed ID: 16905066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Study filters for non-randomized studies of interventions consistently lacked sensitivity upon external validation.
Hausner E; Metzendorf MI; Richter B; Lotz F; Waffenschmidt S
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Dec; 18(1):171. PubMed ID: 30563471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of the performance of seven key bibliographic databases in identifying all relevant systematic reviews of interventions for hypertension.
Rathbone J; Carter M; Hoffmann T; Glasziou P
Syst Rev; 2016 Feb; 5():27. PubMed ID: 26862061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Developing efficient search strategies to identify reports of adverse effects in MEDLINE and EMBASE.
Golder S; McIntosh HM; Duffy S; Glanville J;
Health Info Libr J; 2006 Mar; 23(1):3-12. PubMed ID: 16466494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Systematic reviews of test accuracy should search a range of databases to identify primary studies.
Whiting P; Westwood M; Burke M; Sterne J; Glanville J
J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Apr; 61(4):357-364. PubMed ID: 18313560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Beyond Medline: reducing bias through extended systematic review search.
Savoie I; Helmer D; Green CJ; Kazanjian A
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2003; 19(1):168-78. PubMed ID: 12701949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Searching Embase and MEDLINE by using only major descriptors or title and abstract fields: a prospective exploratory study.
Bramer WM; Giustini D; Kleijnen J; Franco OH
Syst Rev; 2018 Nov; 7(1):200. PubMed ID: 30458825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Which resources should be used to identify RCT/CCTs for systematic reviews: a systematic review.
Crumley ET; Wiebe N; Cramer K; Klassen TP; Hartling L
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2005 Aug; 5():24. PubMed ID: 16092960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
