These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24754804)

  • 1. Increased facial width-to-height ratio and perceived dominance in the faces of the UK's leading business leaders.
    Alrajih S; Ward J
    Br J Psychol; 2014 May; 105(2):153-61. PubMed ID: 24754804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Predicting Firm Success From the Facial Appearance of Chief Executive Officers of Non-Profit Organizations.
    Re DE; Rule NO
    Perception; 2016 Oct; 45(10):1137-50. PubMed ID: 27329518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The facial width-to-height ratio shares stronger links with judgments of aggression than with judgments of trustworthiness.
    Geniole SN; Molnar DS; Carré JM; McCormick CM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Aug; 40(4):1526-41. PubMed ID: 24820443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Facial width-to-height ratio predicts self-reported dominance and aggression in males and females, but a measure of masculinity does not.
    Lefevre CE; Etchells PJ; Howell EC; Clark AP; Penton-Voak IS
    Biol Lett; 2014 Oct; 10(10):20140729. PubMed ID: 25339656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Valid facial cues to cooperation and trust: male facial width and trustworthiness.
    Stirrat M; Perrett DI
    Psychol Sci; 2010 Mar; 21(3):349-54. PubMed ID: 20424067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of Perceived Height, Masculinity, and Age on Each Other and on Perceptions of Dominance in Male Faces.
    Batres C; Re DE; Perrett DI
    Perception; 2015; 44(11):1293-309. PubMed ID: 26562897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Estimating aggression from emotionally neutral faces: which facial cues are diagnostic?
    Carré JM; Morrissey MD; Mondloch CJ; McCormick CM
    Perception; 2010; 39(3):356-77. PubMed ID: 20465172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evidence from Meta-Analyses of the Facial Width-to-Height Ratio as an Evolved Cue of Threat.
    Geniole SN; Denson TF; Dixson BJ; Carré JM; McCormick CM
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0132726. PubMed ID: 26181579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Apparent height and body mass index influence perceived leadership ability in three-dimensional faces.
    Re DE; Dzhelyova M; Holzleitner IJ; Tigue CC; Feinberg DR; Perrett DI
    Perception; 2012; 41(12):1477-85. PubMed ID: 23586287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Geometric morphometrics of male facial shape in relation to physical strength and perceived attractiveness, dominance, and masculinity.
    Windhager S; Schaefer K; Fink B
    Am J Hum Biol; 2011; 23(6):805-14. PubMed ID: 21957062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Facial width-to-height ratio differs by social rank across organizations, countries, and value systems.
    Hahn T; Winter NR; Anderl C; Notebaert K; Wuttke AM; Clément CC; Windmann S
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(11):e0187957. PubMed ID: 29121113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How components of facial width to height ratio differently contribute to the perception of social traits.
    Costa M; Lio G; Gomez A; Sirigu A
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0172739. PubMed ID: 28235081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A face only an investor could love: CEOs' facial structure predicts their firms' financial performance.
    Wong EM; Ormiston ME; Haselhuhn MP
    Psychol Sci; 2011 Dec; 22(12):1478-83. PubMed ID: 22042727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Facial cues to perceived height influence leadership choices in simulated war and peace contexts.
    Re DE; DeBruine LM; Jones BC; Perrett DI
    Evol Psychol; 2013 Jan; 11(1):89-103. PubMed ID: 23372088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Perception of Emergent Leaders' Faces and Evolution of Social Cheating: Cross-Cultural Experiments.
    Rostovtseva VV; Mezentseva AA; Butovskaya ML
    Evol Psychol; 2022; 20(1):14747049221081733. PubMed ID: 35238674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Impressions of dominance are made relative to others in the visual environment.
    Re DE; Lefevre CE; DeBruine LM; Jones BC; Perrett DI
    Evol Psychol; 2014 Mar; 12(1):251-63. PubMed ID: 25299763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Facial movements strategically camouflage involuntary social signals of face morphology.
    Gill D; Garrod OG; Jack RE; Schyns PG
    Psychol Sci; 2014 May; 25(5):1079-86. PubMed ID: 24659191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Context-specific effects of facial dominance and trustworthiness on hypothetical leadership decisions.
    Ferguson HS; Owen A; Hahn AC; Torrance J; DeBruine LM; Jones BC
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(7):e0214261. PubMed ID: 31356614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Face gender and stereotypicality influence facial trait evaluation: Counter-stereotypical female faces are negatively evaluated.
    Sutherland CA; Young AW; Mootz CA; Oldmeadow JA
    Br J Psychol; 2015 May; 106(2):186-208. PubMed ID: 25168952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A lack of sexual dimorphism in width-to-height ratio in white European faces using 2D photographs, 3D scans, and anthropometry.
    Kramer RS; Jones AL; Ward R
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(8):e42705. PubMed ID: 22880088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.