These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
252 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24754812)
1. Women are more sensitive than men to prior trial events on the Stop-signal task. Thakkar KN; Congdon E; Poldrack RA; Sabb FW; London ED; Cannon TD; Bilder RM Br J Psychol; 2014 May; 105(2):254-72. PubMed ID: 24754812 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Response Time Adjustment in the Stop Signal Task: Development in Children and Adolescents. Dupuis A; Indralingam M; Chevrier A; Crosbie J; Arnold P; Burton CL; Schachar R Child Dev; 2019 Mar; 90(2):e263-e272. PubMed ID: 29603204 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Balancing cognitive demands: control adjustments in the stop-signal paradigm. Bissett PG; Logan GD J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Mar; 37(2):392-404. PubMed ID: 21171806 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evidence for selective adjustments of inhibitory control in a variant of the stop signal task. Xu KZ; Mayse JD; Courtney S Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Apr; 72(4):818-831. PubMed ID: 29589791 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Preparation to inhibit a response complements response inhibition during performance of a stop-signal task. Chikazoe J; Jimura K; Hirose S; Yamashita K; Miyashita Y; Konishi S J Neurosci; 2009 Dec; 29(50):15870-7. PubMed ID: 20016103 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A unified account of simple and response-selective inhibition. Gronau QF; Hinder MR; Salomoni SE; Matzke D; Heathcote A Cogn Psychol; 2024 Mar; 149():101628. PubMed ID: 38199181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Startle reveals decreased response preparatory activation during a stop-signal task. Drummond NM; Cressman EK; Carlsen AN J Neurophysiol; 2016 Sep; 116(3):986-94. PubMed ID: 27281747 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Independent component analysis of functional networks for response inhibition: Inter-subject variation in stop signal reaction time. Zhang S; Tsai SJ; Hu S; Xu J; Chao HH; Calhoun VD; Li CS Hum Brain Mapp; 2015 Sep; 36(9):3289-302. PubMed ID: 26089095 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sex differences in inhibitory control in socially-housed baboons (Papio papio). Lacreuse A; Gullstrand J; Fagot J Behav Brain Res; 2016 Oct; 312():231-7. PubMed ID: 27321783 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Inhibitory mechanisms involved in Stroop-matching and stop-signal tasks and the role of impulsivity. Portugal ACA; Afonso AS; Caldas AL; Maturana W; Mocaiber I; Machado-Pinheiro W Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Nov; 191():234-243. PubMed ID: 30343096 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A differential impact of action-effect temporal contiguity on different measures of response inhibition in the Go\No-Go and Stop-signal paradigms. Karsh N; Soker-Mijalevich E; Horovitz O Psychol Res; 2024 Jun; 88(4):1157-1168. PubMed ID: 38453736 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Do after "not to do": Deinhibition in cognitive control. Chen J; Cao B; Li F Mem Cognit; 2023 Aug; 51(6):1388-1403. PubMed ID: 36853480 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A reaction-time adjusted PSI method for estimating performance in the stop-signal task. Weise L; Boecker M; Gauggel S; Falkenburger B; Drueke B PLoS One; 2018; 13(12):e0210065. PubMed ID: 30596788 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cognitive flexibility: A distinct element of performance impairment due to sleep deprivation. Honn KA; Hinson JM; Whitney P; Van Dongen HPA Accid Anal Prev; 2019 May; 126():191-197. PubMed ID: 29549968 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]