These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24755864)
1. Advanced beamformers for cochlear implant users: acute measurement of speech perception in challenging listening conditions. Buechner A; Dyballa KH; Hehrmann P; Fredelake S; Lenarz T PLoS One; 2014; 9(4):e95542. PubMed ID: 24755864 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Benefits of bilateral electrical stimulation with the nucleus cochlear implant in adults: 6-month postoperative results. Laszig R; Aschendorff A; Stecker M; Müller-Deile J; Maune S; Dillier N; Weber B; Hey M; Begall K; Lenarz T; Battmer RD; Böhm M; Steffens T; Strutz J; Linder T; Probst R; Allum J; Westhofen M; Doering W Otol Neurotol; 2004 Nov; 25(6):958-68. PubMed ID: 15547426 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Speech understanding and listening effort in cochlear implant users - microphone beamformers lead to significant improvements in noisy environments. Büchner A; Schwebs M; Lenarz T Cochlear Implants Int; 2020 Jan; 21(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 31590612 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Fixed and adaptive beamforming improves speech perception in noise in cochlear implant recipients equipped with the MED-EL SONNET audio processor. Honeder C; Liepins R; Arnoldner C; Šinkovec H; Kaider A; Vyskocil E; Riss D PLoS One; 2018; 13(1):e0190718. PubMed ID: 29304186 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Effect of Binaural Beamforming Technology on Speech Intelligibility in Bimodal Cochlear Implant Recipients. Vroegop JL; Homans NC; Goedegebure A; Dingemanse JG; van Immerzeel T; van der Schroeff MP Audiol Neurootol; 2018; 23(1):32-38. PubMed ID: 29936510 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Monaural Beamforming in Bimodal Cochlear Implant Users: Effect of (A)symmetric Directivity and Noise Type. Devocht EM; Janssen AM; Chalupper J; Stokroos RJ; George EL PLoS One; 2016; 11(8):e0160829. PubMed ID: 27537075 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Beamforming and Single-Microphone Noise Reduction: Effects on Signal-to-Noise Ratio and Speech Recognition of Bimodal Cochlear Implant Users. Stronks HC; Briaire J; Frijns J Trends Hear; 2022; 26():23312165221112762. PubMed ID: 35862265 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Speech reception threshold benefits in cochlear implant users with an adaptive beamformer in real life situations. Geißler G; Arweiler I; Hehrmann P; Lenarz T; Hamacher V; Büchner A Cochlear Implants Int; 2015 Mar; 16(2):69-76. PubMed ID: 24993633 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Benefit of the UltraZoom beamforming technology in noise in cochlear implant users. Mosnier I; Mathias N; Flament J; Amar D; Liagre-Callies A; Borel S; Ambert-Dahan E; Sterkers O; Bernardeschi D Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Sep; 274(9):3335-3342. PubMed ID: 28664331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of Microphone Configuration and Sound Source Location on Speech Recognition for Adult Cochlear Implant Users with Current-Generation Sound Processors. Dwyer RT; Roberts J; Gifford RH J Am Acad Audiol; 2020 Sep; 31(8):578-589. PubMed ID: 32340055 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Speech perception for adult cochlear implant recipients in a realistic background noise: effectiveness of preprocessing strategies and external options for improving speech recognition in noise. Gifford RH; Revit LJ J Am Acad Audiol; 2010; 21(7):441-51; quiz 487-8. PubMed ID: 20807480 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Residual Hearing Does Not Influence the Effectiveness of Beamforming when Using a Cochlear Implant in Conjunction with Contralateral Routing of Signals. Stronks HC; Briaire JJ; Frijns JHM Audiol Neurootol; 2023; 28(4):262-271. PubMed ID: 36791686 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study. Morera C; Manrique M; Ramos A; Garcia-Ibanez L; Cavalle L; Huarte A; Castillo C; Estrada E Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of Microphone Configuration on Speech Perception of Cochlear Implant Users in Traffic Noise. Weissgerber T; Bandeira M; Brendel M; Stöver T; Baumann U Otol Neurotol; 2019 Mar; 40(3):e198-e205. PubMed ID: 30741896 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of a moving noise masker on speech perception in cochlear implant users. Weissgerber T; Rader T; Baumann U PLoS One; 2015; 10(5):e0126133. PubMed ID: 25970594 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of different signal processing options in unilateral and bilateral cochlear freedom implant recipients using R-Space background noise. Brockmeyer AM; Potts LG J Am Acad Audiol; 2011 Feb; 22(2):65-80. PubMed ID: 21463562 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An Evaluation of Hearing Aid Beamforming Microphone Arrays in a Noisy Laboratory Setting. Picou EM; Ricketts TA J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Feb; 30(2):131-144. PubMed ID: 30461406 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Improving speech perception in noise for children with cochlear implants. Gifford RH; Olund AP; DeJong M J Am Acad Audiol; 2011 Oct; 22(9):623-632. PubMed ID: 22192607 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of Microphone Location and Beamforming Technology on Speech Recognition in Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients. Holder JT; Taylor AL; Sunderhaus LW; Gifford RH J Am Acad Audiol; 2020 Jul; 31(7):506-512. PubMed ID: 32119817 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. More challenging speech-perception tasks demonstrate binaural benefit in bilateral cochlear implant users. Wackym PA; Runge-Samuelson CL; Firszt JB; Alkaf FM; Burg LS Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2 Suppl):80S-85S. PubMed ID: 17496654 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]