166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24756610)
1. Consequences of false-positive screening mammograms.
Tosteson AN; Fryback DG; Hammond CS; Hanna LG; Grove MR; Brown M; Wang Q; Lindfors K; Pisano ED
JAMA Intern Med; 2014 Jun; 174(6):954-61. PubMed ID: 24756610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influence of false-positive mammography results on subsequent screening: do physician recommendations buffer negative effects?
DeFrank JT; Rimer BK; Bowling JM; Earp JA; Breslau ES; Brewer NT
J Med Screen; 2012 Mar; 19(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 22438505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Women's Experiences of Inaccurate Breast Cancer Screening Results: A Systematic Review and Qualitative Meta-synthesis.
Health Quality Ontario
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2016; 16(16):1-22. PubMed ID: 27468327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of protocol-related variables and women's characteristics on the cumulative false-positive risk in breast cancer screening.
Román R; Sala M; Salas D; Ascunce N; Zubizarreta R; Castells X
Ann Oncol; 2012 Jan; 23(1):104-111. PubMed ID: 21430183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A Semiautonomous Deep Learning System to Reduce False Positives in Screening Mammography.
Pedemonte S; Tsue T; Mombourquette B; Truong Vu YN; Matthews T; Morales Hoil R; Shah M; Ghare N; Zingman-Daniels N; Holley S; Appleton CM; Su J; Wahl RL
Radiol Artif Intell; 2024 May; 6(3):e230033. PubMed ID: 38597785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Psychosocial consequences of skin cancer screening.
Risica PM; Matthews NH; Dionne L; Mello J; Ferris LK; Saul M; Geller AC; Solano F; Kirkwood JM; Weinstock MA
Prev Med Rep; 2018 Jun; 10():310-316. PubMed ID: 29868385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Confusion and Anxiety Following Breast Density Notification: Fact or Fiction?
Dench EK; Darcey EC; Keogh L; McLean K; Pirikahu S; Saunders C; Thompson S; Woulfe C; Wylie E; Stone J
J Clin Med; 2020 Mar; 9(4):. PubMed ID: 32235552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Fatigue and vigilance in medical experts detecting breast cancer.
Taylor-Phillips S; Jenkinson D; Stinton C; Kunar MA; Watson DG; Freeman K; Mansbridge A; Wallis MG; Kearins O; Hudson S; Clarke A
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2024 Mar; 121(11):e2309576121. PubMed ID: 38437559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Is unhealthy substance use associated with failure to receive cancer screening and flu vaccination? A retrospective cross-sectional study.
Lasser KE; Kim TW; Alford DP; Cabral H; Saitz R; Samet JH
BMJ Open; 2011 Apr; 1(1):e000046. PubMed ID: 22021737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Screening and Selection: The Case of Mammograms.
Einav L; Finkelstein A; Oostrom T; Ostriker A; Williams H
Am Econ Rev; 2020 Dec; 110(12):3836-3870. PubMed ID: 34305149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mammographic artifact leading to false-positive result.
Avelar MS; Almeida O; Alvares BR
Radiol Bras; 2015; 48(3):198-9. PubMed ID: 26185350
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Perspectives on mammography after receipt of secondary screening owing to a false positive.
Thomson MD; Siminoff LA
Womens Health Issues; 2015; 25(2):128-33. PubMed ID: 25648490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Diagnostic invasiveness and psychosocial consequences of false-positive mammography.
Heleno B; Siersma VD; Brodersen J
Ann Fam Med; 2015; 13(3):242-9. PubMed ID: 25964402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Benefits, harms, and costs for breast cancer screening after US implementation of digital mammography.
Stout NK; Lee SJ; Schechter CB; Kerlikowske K; Alagoz O; Berry D; Buist DS; Cevik M; Chisholm G; de Koning HJ; Huang H; Hubbard RA; Miglioretti DL; Munsell MF; Trentham-Dietz A; van Ravesteyn NT; Tosteson AN; Mandelblatt JS
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2014 Jun; 106(6):dju092. PubMed ID: 24872543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Waiting time and the psychosocial consequences of false-positive mammography: cohort study.
Heleno B; Siersma V; Brodersen J
J Negat Results Biomed; 2015 Apr; 14():8. PubMed ID: 25925408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Improving screening recall services for women with false-positive mammograms: a comparison of qualitative evidence with UK guidelines.
Bond M; Garside R; Hyde C
BMJ Open; 2015 Jan; 5(1):e005855. PubMed ID: 25618139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The patient burden of screening mammography recall.
Alcusky M; Philpotts L; Bonafede M; Clarke J; Skoufalos A
J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2014 Sep; 23 Suppl 1():S11-9. PubMed ID: 25247382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Benefits and Harms of Breast Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review.
Myers ER; Moorman P; Gierisch JM; Havrilesky LJ; Grimm LJ; Ghate S; Davidson B; Mongtomery RC; Crowley MJ; McCrory DC; Kendrick A; Sanders GD
JAMA; 2015 Oct; 314(15):1615-34. PubMed ID: 26501537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ten-year risk of false positive screening mammograms and clinical breast examinations.
Elmore JG; Barton MB; Moceri VM; Polk S; Arena PJ; Fletcher SW
N Engl J Med; 1998 Apr; 338(16):1089-96. PubMed ID: 9545356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. False-negative rate of combined mammography and ultrasound for women with palpable breast masses.
Chan CH; Coopey SB; Freer PE; Hughes KS
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2015 Oct; 153(3):699-702. PubMed ID: 26341750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
