329 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24758293)
1. Comparison of methods for fecal microbiome biospecimen collection.
Dominianni C; Wu J; Hayes RB; Ahn J
BMC Microbiol; 2014 Apr; 14():103. PubMed ID: 24758293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of Fecal Collection Methods for Microbiome and Metabolomics Studies.
Wang Z; Zolnik CP; Qiu Y; Usyk M; Wang T; Strickler HD; Isasi CR; Kaplan RC; Kurland IJ; Qi Q; Burk RD
Front Cell Infect Microbiol; 2018; 8():301. PubMed ID: 30234027
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of Methods To Collect Fecal Samples for Microbiome Studies Using Whole-Genome Shotgun Metagenomic Sequencing.
Byrd DA; Sinha R; Hoffman KL; Chen J; Hua X; Shi J; Chia N; Petrosino J; Vogtmann E
mSphere; 2020 Feb; 5(1):. PubMed ID: 32250964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Collection of non-meconium stool on fecal occult blood cards is an effective method for fecal microbiota studies in infants.
Wong WSW; Clemency N; Klein E; Provenzano M; Iyer R; Niederhuber JE; Hourigan SK
Microbiome; 2017 Sep; 5(1):114. PubMed ID: 28870234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of Fecal Collection Methods on Variation in Gut Metagenomics and Untargeted Metabolomics.
Guan H; Pu Y; Liu C; Lou T; Tan S; Kong M; Sun Z; Mei Z; Qi Q; Quan Z; Zhao G; Zheng Y
mSphere; 2021 Oct; 6(5):e0063621. PubMed ID: 34523982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of fecal and oral collection methods for studies of the human microbiota in two Iranian cohorts.
Wu Z; Hullings AG; Ghanbari R; Etemadi A; Wan Y; Zhu B; Poustchi H; Fahraji BB; Sakhvidi MJZ; Shi J; Knight R; Malekzadeh R; Sinha R; Vogtmann E
BMC Microbiol; 2021 Nov; 21(1):324. PubMed ID: 34809575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reliability of a participant-friendly fecal collection method for microbiome analyses: a step towards large sample size investigation.
Szopinska JW; Gresse R; van der Marel S; Boekhorst J; Lukovac S; van Swam I; Franke B; Timmerman H; Belzer C; Arias Vasquez A
BMC Microbiol; 2018 Sep; 18(1):110. PubMed ID: 30189859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reproducibility, stability, and accuracy of microbial profiles by fecal sample collection method in three distinct populations.
Byrd DA; Chen J; Vogtmann E; Hullings A; Song SJ; Amir A; Kibriya MG; Ahsan H; Chen Y; Nelson H; Knight R; Shi J; Chia N; Sinha R
PLoS One; 2019; 14(11):e0224757. PubMed ID: 31738775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of Fecal Collection Methods for Microbiota Studies in Bangladesh.
Vogtmann E; Chen J; Kibriya MG; Chen Y; Islam T; Eunes M; Ahmed A; Naher J; Rahman A; Amir A; Shi J; Abnet CC; Nelson H; Knight R; Chia N; Ahsan H; Sinha R
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2017 May; 83(10):. PubMed ID: 28258145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of Collection Methods for Fecal Samples in Microbiome Studies.
Vogtmann E; Chen J; Amir A; Shi J; Abnet CC; Nelson H; Knight R; Chia N; Sinha R
Am J Epidemiol; 2017 Jan; 185(2):115-123. PubMed ID: 27986704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of rectal swab, glove tip, and participant-collected stool techniques for gut microbiome sampling.
Short MI; Hudson R; Besasie BD; Reveles KR; Shah DP; Nicholson S; Johnson-Pais TL; Weldon K; Lai Z; Leach RJ; Fongang B; Liss MA
BMC Microbiol; 2021 Jan; 21(1):26. PubMed ID: 33446094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Storage conditions of intestinal microbiota matter in metagenomic analysis.
Cardona S; Eck A; Cassellas M; Gallart M; Alastrue C; Dore J; Azpiroz F; Roca J; Guarner F; Manichanh C
BMC Microbiol; 2012 Jul; 12():158. PubMed ID: 22846661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of Fecal Sample Collection Methods for Microbial Analysis Embedded within Colorectal Cancer Screening Programs.
Zouiouich S; Mariadassou M; Rué O; Vogtmann E; Huybrechts I; Severi G; Boutron-Ruault MC; Senore C; Naccarati A; Mengozzi G; Kozlakidis Z; Jenab M; Sinha R; Gunter MJ; Leclerc M
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2022 Feb; 31(2):305-314. PubMed ID: 34782392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessment of the impact of different fecal storage protocols on the microbiota diversity and composition: a pilot study.
Moossavi S; Engen PA; Ghanbari R; Green SJ; Naqib A; Bishehsari F; Merat S; Poustchi H; Keshavarzian A; Malekzadeh R
BMC Microbiol; 2019 Jun; 19(1):145. PubMed ID: 31253096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A metagenomic study of the gut microbiome in Behcet's disease.
Ye Z; Zhang N; Wu C; Zhang X; Wang Q; Huang X; Du L; Cao Q; Tang J; Zhou C; Hou S; He Y; Xu Q; Xiong X; Kijlstra A; Qin N; Yang P
Microbiome; 2018 Aug; 6(1):135. PubMed ID: 30077182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Stability of the Fecal and Oral Microbiome over 2 Years at -80°C for Multiple Collection Methods.
Zouiouich S; Byrd DA; Hua X; Karwa S; Wan Y; Shi J; Humphrey GC; Ackermann GL; Knight R; Abnet CC; Vogtmann E; Sinha R
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2023 Mar; 32(3):444-451. PubMed ID: 36649143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Systematic Analysis of Impact of Sampling Regions and Storage Methods on Fecal Gut Microbiome and Metabolome Profiles.
Liang Y; Dong T; Chen M; He L; Wang T; Liu X; Chang H; Mao JH; Hang B; Snijders AM; Xia Y
mSphere; 2020 Jan; 5(1):. PubMed ID: 31915218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fecal microbiota analysis: an overview of sample collection methods and sequencing strategies.
Thomas V; Clark J; Doré J
Future Microbiol; 2015; 10(9):1485-504. PubMed ID: 26347019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Long-term taxonomic and functional stability of the gut microbiome from human fecal samples.
Kim JH; Jeon JY; Im YJ; Ha N; Kim JK; Moon SJ; Kim MG
Sci Rep; 2023 Jan; 13(1):114. PubMed ID: 36596832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Human faecal collection methods demonstrate a bias in microbiome composition by cell wall structure.
Watson EJ; Giles J; Scherer BL; Blatchford P
Sci Rep; 2019 Nov; 9(1):16831. PubMed ID: 31727963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
