295 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24758919)
1. The Lung Reporting and Data System (LU-RADS): a proposal for computed tomography screening.
Manos D; Seely JM; Taylor J; Borgaonkar J; Roberts HC; Mayo JR
Can Assoc Radiol J; 2014 May; 65(2):121-34. PubMed ID: 24758919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Malignancy estimation of Lung-RADS criteria for subsolid nodules on CT: accuracy of low and high risk spectrum when using NLST nodules.
Chung K; Jacobs C; Scholten ET; Mets OM; Dekker I; Prokop M; van Ginneken B; Schaefer-Prokop CM
Eur Radiol; 2017 Nov; 27(11):4672-4679. PubMed ID: 28439653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Lung-RADS Category 4X: Does It Improve Prediction of Malignancy in Subsolid Nodules?
Chung K; Jacobs C; Scholten ET; Goo JM; Prosch H; Sverzellati N; Ciompi F; Mets OM; Gerke PK; Prokop M; van Ginneken B; Schaefer-Prokop CM
Radiology; 2017 Jul; 284(1):264-271. PubMed ID: 28339311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Lung-RADS Version 1.0 versus Lung-RADS Version 1.1: Comparison of Categories Using Nodules from the National Lung Screening Trial.
Kastner J; Hossain R; Jeudy J; Dako F; Mehta V; Dalal S; Dharaiya E; White C
Radiology; 2021 Jul; 300(1):199-206. PubMed ID: 33944631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Interobserver variability in Lung CT Screening Reporting and Data System categorisation in subsolid nodule-enriched lung cancer screening CTs.
Yoon SH; Kim YJ; Doh K; Kim J; Lee KH; Lee KW; Kim J
Eur Radiol; 2021 Sep; 31(9):7184-7191. PubMed ID: 33733688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Malignant Nodules Detected on Lung Cancer Screening CT: Yield of Short-Term Follow-Up CT in Showing Nodule Growth.
Byrne SC; Hammer MM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2022 Nov; 219(5):735-741. PubMed ID: 35674352
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Vancouver Risk Calculator Compared with ACR Lung-RADS in Predicting Malignancy: Analysis of the National Lung Screening Trial.
White CS; Dharaiya E; Dalal S; Chen R; Haramati LB
Radiology; 2019 Apr; 291(1):205-211. PubMed ID: 30667335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Strategies for Reducing False-Positive Screening Results for Intermediate-Size Nodules Evaluated Using Lung-RADS: A Secondary Analysis of National Lung Screening Trial Data.
Hammer MM; Hunsaker AR
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2022 Sep; 219(3):397-405. PubMed ID: 35319912
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Characterizing Lung-RADS category 4 lesions in a university lung cancer screening program.
Kocher Wulfeck M; Plesner S; Herndon JE; Christensen JD; Patz EF
Lung Cancer; 2023 Dec; 186():107420. PubMed ID: 37956610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Rate of benign nodule resection in a lung cancer screening program.
El Alam R; Byrne SC; Hammer MM
Clin Imaging; 2023 Dec; 104():109984. PubMed ID: 37832324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cancer Risk in Nodules Detected at Follow-Up Lung Cancer Screening CT.
Hammer MM; Byrne SC
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2022 Apr; 218(4):634-641. PubMed ID: 34755524
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Cancer Risk in Subsolid Nodules in the National Lung Screening Trial.
Hammer MM; Palazzo LL; Kong CY; Hunsaker AR
Radiology; 2019 Nov; 293(2):441-448. PubMed ID: 31526256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Lung-RADS Category 3 and 4 Nodules on Lung Cancer Screening in Clinical Practice.
Mendoza DP; Petranovic M; Som A; Wu MY; Park EY; Zhang EW; Archer JM; McDermott S; Khandekar M; Lanuti M; Gainor JF; Lennes IT; Shepard JO; Digumarthy SR
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2022 Jul; 219(1):55-65. PubMed ID: 35080453
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Malignancy risk estimation of screen-detected nodules at baseline CT: comparison of the PanCan model, Lung-RADS and NCCN guidelines.
van Riel SJ; Ciompi F; Jacobs C; Winkler Wille MM; Scholten ET; Naqibullah M; Lam S; Prokop M; Schaefer-Prokop C; van Ginneken B
Eur Radiol; 2017 Oct; 27(10):4019-4029. PubMed ID: 28293773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison Between Radiological Semantic Features and Lung-RADS in Predicting Malignancy of Screen-Detected Lung Nodules in the National Lung Screening Trial.
Li Q; Balagurunathan Y; Liu Y; Qi J; Schabath MB; Ye Z; Gillies RJ
Clin Lung Cancer; 2018 Mar; 19(2):148-156.e3. PubMed ID: 29137847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Observer variability for Lung-RADS categorisation of lung cancer screening CTs: impact on patient management.
van Riel SJ; Jacobs C; Scholten ET; Wittenberg R; Winkler Wille MM; de Hoop B; Sprengers R; Mets OM; Geurts B; Prokop M; Schaefer-Prokop C; van Ginneken B
Eur Radiol; 2019 Feb; 29(2):924-931. PubMed ID: 30066248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of ultra-low dose chest CT scanning protocols for the detection of pulmonary nodules: a phantom study.
Milanese G; Silva M; Frauenfelder T; Eberhard M; Sabia F; Martini C; Marchianò A; Prokop M; Sverzellati N; Pastorino U
Tumori; 2019 Oct; 105(5):394-403. PubMed ID: 31041885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Application of Lung-Screening Reporting and Data System Versus Pan-Canadian Early Detection of Lung Cancer Nodule Risk Calculation in the Alberta Lung Cancer Screening Study.
Tremblay A; Taghizadeh N; MacGregor JH; Armstrong G; Bristow MS; Guo LLQ; Lydell C; Pereira R; Lee A; Elliot T; MacEachern P; Graham A; Dickinson JA; Koetzler R; Lam SC; Yang H; Bédard EL; Tammemagi M; Burrowes P
J Am Coll Radiol; 2019 Oct; 16(10):1425-1432. PubMed ID: 31103442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A Comparison of the PanCan Model and Lung-RADS to Assess Cancer Probability Among People With Screening-Detected, Solid Lung Nodules.
Sundaram V; Gould MK; Nair VS
Chest; 2021 Mar; 159(3):1273-1282. PubMed ID: 33393476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Insights for Management of Ground-Glass Opacities From the National Lung Screening Trial.
Robbins HA; Katki HA; Cheung LC; Landy R; Berg CD
J Thorac Oncol; 2019 Sep; 14(9):1662-1665. PubMed ID: 31125735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
