BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24759752)

  • 21. A new dawn for buried garbage? An investigation of the marketability of previously disposed shredder waste.
    Johansson N; Krook J; Frändegård P
    Waste Manag; 2017 Feb; 60():417-427. PubMed ID: 27216727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Evaluation and selection of decision-making methods to assess landfill mining projects.
    Hermann R; Baumgartner RJ; Vorbach S; Ragossnig A; Pomberger R
    Waste Manag Res; 2015 Sep; 33(9):822-32. PubMed ID: 26123349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Choice of noxious facilities: case of a solid waste incinerator versus a sanitary landfill in Malaysia.
    Othman J; Khee PC
    Waste Manag Res; 2014 May; 32(5):454-7. PubMed ID: 24595362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Quantitative Analysis of Critical Factors for the Climate Impact of Landfill Mining.
    Laner D; Cencic O; Svensson N; Krook J
    Environ Sci Technol; 2016 Jul; 50(13):6882-91. PubMed ID: 27282202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Municipal solid waste management in rural areas and small counties: an economic analysis using contingent valuation to estimate willingness to pay for Yunnan, China.
    Wang H; He J; Kim Y; Kamata T
    Waste Manag Res; 2014 Aug; 32(8):695-706. PubMed ID: 25023984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Environmental and economic assessment of Enhanced Landfill Mining in Tehran.
    Sabour MR; Alam E; Mostafa Hatami A
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2020 Sep; 27(27):34469-34483. PubMed ID: 32557053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. An estimation of the social costs of landfill siting using a choice experiment.
    Sasao T
    Waste Manag; 2004; 24(8):753-62. PubMed ID: 15381227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Valuing a hypothetical cure for rheumatoid arthritis using the contingent valuation methodology: the patient perspective.
    Fautrel B; Clarke AE; Guillemin F; Adam V; St-Pierre Y; Panaritis T; Fortin PR; Menard HA; Donaldson C; Penrod JR
    J Rheumatol; 2005 Mar; 32(3):443-53. PubMed ID: 15742435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Costs of food waste in South Africa: Incorporating inedible food waste.
    de Lange W; Nahman A
    Waste Manag; 2015 Jun; 40():167-72. PubMed ID: 25818383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. An assessment of bioreactor landfill costs and benefits.
    Berge ND; Reinhart DR; Batarseh ES
    Waste Manag; 2009 May; 29(5):1558-67. PubMed ID: 19167875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Assessing the market opportunities of landfill mining.
    van der Zee DJ; Achterkamp MC; de Visser BJ
    Waste Manag; 2004; 24(8):795-804. PubMed ID: 15381231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Implementing the Contingent Valuation Method for supporting decision making in the waste management sector.
    Gaglias A; Mirasgedis S; Tourkolias C; Georgopoulou E
    Waste Manag; 2016 Jul; 53():237-44. PubMed ID: 27114113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A new economic instrument for financing accelerated landfill aftercare.
    Beaven RP; Knox K; Gronow JR; Hjelmar O; Greedy D; Scharff H
    Waste Manag; 2014 Jul; 34(7):1191-8. PubMed ID: 24768257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Waste-to-energy plant for paper industry sludges disposal: technical-economic study.
    Caputo AC; Pelagagge PM
    J Hazard Mater; 2001 Feb; 81(3):265-83. PubMed ID: 11163691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Determinants of households' willingness-to-pay for private solid waste management services in Ibadan, Nigeria.
    Rahji MA; Oloruntoba EO
    Waste Manag Res; 2009 Dec; 27(10):961-5. PubMed ID: 19470546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Landfill reduction experience in The Netherlands.
    Scharff H
    Waste Manag; 2014 Nov; 34(11):2218-24. PubMed ID: 24999096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The social benefits of restoring water quality in the context of the Water Framework Directive: A comparison of willingness to pay and willingness to accept.
    Del Saz-Salazar S; Hernández-Sancho F; Sala-Garrido R
    Sci Total Environ; 2009 Aug; 407(16):4574-83. PubMed ID: 19473689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of slope stability in two Brazilian municipal landfills.
    Gharabaghi B; Singh MK; Inkratas C; Fleming IR; McBean E
    Waste Manag; 2008; 28(9):1509-17. PubMed ID: 17897819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison between lab- and full-scale applications of in situ aeration of an old landfill and assessment of long-term emission development after completion.
    Hrad M; Gamperling O; Huber-Humer M
    Waste Manag; 2013 Oct; 33(10):2061-73. PubMed ID: 23428564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Economic analysis of gradual "social exhaustion" of waste management capacity.
    Koide H; Nakayama H
    J Environ Sci (China); 2013 Dec; 25 Suppl 1():S15-9. PubMed ID: 25078819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.