These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24760460)

  • 1. Differential contribution of task conflicts to task switch cost and task mixing cost in alternating runs and cued task-switching: evidence from ex-Gaussian modeling of reaction time distributions.
    Shahar N; Meiran N
    Psychol Res; 2015 Mar; 79(2):259-66. PubMed ID: 24760460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Electrophysiological correlates of the cognitive control processes underpinning mixing and switching costs.
    Tarantino V; Mazzonetto I; Vallesi A
    Brain Res; 2016 Sep; 1646():160-173. PubMed ID: 27238463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Task-switching costs have distinct phase-locked and nonphase-locked EEG power effects.
    McKewen M; Cooper PS; Wong ASW; Michie PT; Sauseng P; Karayanidis F
    Psychophysiology; 2020 May; 57(5):e13533. PubMed ID: 31994736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Brain oscillatory activity associated with switch and mixing costs during reactive control.
    Capizzi M; Ambrosini E; Arbula S; Vallesi A
    Psychophysiology; 2020 Nov; 57(11):e13642. PubMed ID: 32720385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Task practice differentially modulates task-switching performance across the adult lifespan.
    Whitson LR; Karayanidis F; Michie PT
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2012 Jan; 139(1):124-36. PubMed ID: 22000521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Task uncertainty can account for mixing and switch costs in task-switching.
    Cooper PS; Garrett PM; Rennie JL; Karayanidis F
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0131556. PubMed ID: 26107646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Distinct neurophysiological mechanisms mediate mixing costs and switch costs.
    Wylie GR; Murray MM; Javitt DC; Foxe JJ
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Jan; 21(1):105-18. PubMed ID: 18476759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Exploring individual differences in task switching.
    Li B; Li X; Stoet G; Lages M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Feb; 193():80-95. PubMed ID: 30599293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Account of the Effect of Switch Probability on Switch and Mixing Costs: An ERP Study in a Cued Task-switching Paradigm.
    Wenwen C; Yang Y; Cui L; Chen Y; Zhang W; Zhang X; Zhou S
    Cogn Behav Neurol; 2022 Dec; 35(4):230-246. PubMed ID: 36136039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Positive affect facilitates task switching in the dimensional change card sort task: implications for the shifting aspect of executive function.
    Yang H; Yang S
    Cogn Emot; 2014; 28(7):1242-54. PubMed ID: 24456098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dissociable theta networks underlie the switch and mixing costs during task switching.
    McKewen M; Cooper PS; Skippen P; Wong ASW; Michie PT; Karayanidis F
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2021 Oct; 42(14):4643-4657. PubMed ID: 34184803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cue-switch costs in task-switching: cue priming or control processes?
    Grange JA; Houghton G
    Psychol Res; 2010 Sep; 74(5):481-90. PubMed ID: 20037766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The affective twitches of task switches: Task switch cues are evaluated as negative.
    Vermeylen L; Braem S; Notebaert W
    Cognition; 2019 Feb; 183():124-130. PubMed ID: 30447518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Partitioning switch costs when investigating task switching in relation to media multitasking.
    Schneider DW; Chun H
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2021 Jun; 28(3):910-917. PubMed ID: 33634358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Local and Global Task Switching Costs in Bilinguals Who Vary in Second Language Proficiency.
    Tse CS; Altarriba J
    Am J Psychol; 2015; 128(1):89-106. PubMed ID: 26219176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Alternatives to switch-cost scoring in the task-switching paradigm: their reliability and increased validity.
    Hughes MM; Linck JA; Bowles AR; Koeth JT; Bunting MF
    Behav Res Methods; 2014 Sep; 46(3):702-21. PubMed ID: 24356991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Intertrial RT variability affects level of target-related interference in cued task switching.
    Provost A; Jamadar S; Heathcote A; Brown SD; Karayanidis F
    Psychophysiology; 2018 Mar; 55(3):. PubMed ID: 28776698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Examining binding effects on task switch costs and response-repetition effects: Variations of the cue modality and stimulus modality in task switching.
    Kandalowski SRM; Seibold JC; Schuch S; Koch I
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 May; 82(4):1632-1643. PubMed ID: 31820281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The development of anticipatory cognitive control processes in task-switching: an ERP study in children, adolescents, and young adults.
    Manzi A; Nessler D; Czernochowski D; Friedman D
    Psychophysiology; 2011 Sep; 48(9):1258-75. PubMed ID: 21371043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Investigating a method for reducing residual switch costs in cued task switching.
    Schneider DW
    Mem Cognit; 2016 Jul; 44(5):762-77. PubMed ID: 26833200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.