These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24761871)

  • 1. What is the most effective strategy for improving the cancer screening rate in Japan?
    Sano H; Goto R; Hamashima C
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014; 15(6):2607-12. PubMed ID: 24761871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Association between age factors and strategies for promoting participation in gastric and colorectal cancer screenings.
    Hamashima C; Sano H
    BMC Cancer; 2018 Mar; 18(1):345. PubMed ID: 29587681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Rainbow of KIBOU project: Effectiveness of invitation materials for improving cancer screening rate using social marketing and behavioral economics approaches.
    Mizota Y; Yamamoto S
    Soc Sci Med; 2021 Jun; 279():113961. PubMed ID: 34000582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Invitation strategies and coverage in the population-based cancer screening programmes in the European Union.
    Vale DB; Anttila A; Ponti A; Senore C; Sankaranaryanan R; Ronco G; Segnan N; Tomatis M; Žakelj MP; Elfström KM; Lönnberg S; Dillner J; Basu P
    Eur J Cancer Prev; 2019 Mar; 28(2):131-140. PubMed ID: 29570103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Does lack of resources impair access to breast and cervical cancer screening in Japan?
    Sano H; Goto R; Hamashima C
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(7):e0180819. PubMed ID: 28704430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Gastric cancer screening programme in Japan: how to improve its implementation in the community.
    Wang B; Yanagawa H; Sakata K
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 1994 Apr; 48(2):182-7. PubMed ID: 8189176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cancer screening participation in schizophrenic outpatients and the influence of their functional disability on the screening rate: A cross-sectional study in Japan.
    Fujiwara M; Inagaki M; Nakaya N; Fujimori M; Higuchi Y; Hayashibara C; So R; Kakeda K; Kodama M; Uchitomi Y; Yamada N
    Psychiatry Clin Neurosci; 2017 Dec; 71(12):813-825. PubMed ID: 28875514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Attendance rate in the Polish Cervical Cancer Screening Program in the years 2007-2009].
    Spaczyński M; Karowicz-Bilinska A; Rokita W; Molińska-Glura M; Januszek-Michalecka L; Seroczyński P; Uchlik J; Nowak-Markwitz E
    Ginekol Pol; 2010 Sep; 81(9):655-63. PubMed ID: 20973201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of a free-coupon program for cervical cancer screening among the young: a nationally funded program conducted by a local government in Japan.
    Ueda Y; Sobue T; Morimoto A; Egawa-Takata T; Hashizume C; Kishida H; Okamoto S; Yoshino K; Fujita M; Enomoto T; Tomine Y; Fukuyoshi J; Kimura T
    J Epidemiol; 2015; 25(1):50-6. PubMed ID: 25311031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A cancer screening intervention for underserved Latina women by lay educators.
    Larkey LK; Herman PM; Roe DJ; Garcia F; Lopez AM; Gonzalez J; Perera PN; Saboda K
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2012 May; 21(5):557-66. PubMed ID: 22416791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluating the effectiveness of cervical cancer screening invitation letters.
    Decker KM; Turner D; Demers AA; Martens PJ; Lambert P; Chateau D
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2013 Aug; 22(8):687-93. PubMed ID: 23915107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Does mammogram attendance influence participation in cervical and colorectal cancer screening? A prospective study among 1856 French women.
    Bertaut A; Coudert J; Bengrine L; Dancourt V; Binquet C; Douvier S
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(6):e0198939. PubMed ID: 29927995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Project conducted in Hirakata to improve cervical cancer screening rates in 20-year-old Japanese: Influencing parents to recommend that their daughters undergo cervical cancer screening.
    Yagi A; Ueda Y; Egawa-Takata T; Tanaka Y; Terai Y; Ohmichi M; Ichimura T; Sumi T; Murata H; Okada H; Nakai H; Mandai M; Matsuzaki S; Kobayashi E; Yoshino K; Kimura T; Saito J; Hori Y; Morii E; Nakayama T; Suzuki Y; Motoki Y; Sukegawa A; Asai-Sato M; Miyagi E; Yamaguchi M; Kudo R; Adachi S; Sekine M; Enomoto T; Horikoshi Y; Takagi T; Shimura K
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2016 Dec; 42(12):1802-1807. PubMed ID: 27641631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [A survey regarding the implementation of cancer screening among municipalities in Japan].
    Nakaya N; Ohmori K; Suzuki Y; Hozawa A; Kuriyama S; Tsubono Y; Tsuji I
    Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi; 2004 Jul; 51(7):530-9. PubMed ID: 15446671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Analyses of factors influencing participation in the cervical cancer screening programme in the community in Japan.
    Hirano Y; Ojima T
    J Epidemiol; 1997 Sep; 7(3):125-33. PubMed ID: 9337510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Relationship of detection rate of PET cancer screening examinees and risk factors: analysis of background of examinees.
    Shibata K; Arai M; Matsuura M; Uno K; Yoshida T; Momose T; Ohtomo K
    Ann Nucl Med; 2011 May; 25(4):261-7. PubMed ID: 21188657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Methods to increase participation in cancer screening programmes].
    Giorgi Rossi P; Camilloni L; Cogo C; Federici A; Ferroni E; Furnari G; Giordano L; Grazzini G; Iossa A; Jimenez B; Palazzi M; Palazzo F; Spadea T; Senore C; Borgia P; Guasticchi G
    Epidemiol Prev; 2012 Jan; 36(1 Suppl 1):1-104. PubMed ID: 22418841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Trends in the cervical cancer screening rates in a city in Japan between the years of 2004 and 2013.
    Tanaka Y; Ueda Y; Kishida H; Hosogai N; Morimoto A; Egawa-Takata T; Matsuzaki S; Kobayashi E; Yoshino K; Kimura T
    Int J Clin Oncol; 2015 Dec; 20(6):1156-60. PubMed ID: 25990449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cervical cancer screening: a prospective cohort study of the effects of historical patient compliance and a population-based informatics prompted reminder on screening rates.
    MacLaughlin KL; Swanson KM; Naessens JM; Angstman KB; Chaudhry R
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2014 Apr; 20(2):136-43. PubMed ID: 24237657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effectiveness, costs, and cost-effectiveness of recruitment strategies for a mammographic screening program to detect breast cancer.
    Hurley SF; Jolley DJ; Livingston PM; Reading D; Cockburn J; Flint-Richter D
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 1992 Jun; 84(11):855-63. PubMed ID: 1593653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.