123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24762922)
1. In the attraction, compromise, and similarity effects, alternatives are repeatedly compared in pairs on single dimensions.
Noguchi T; Stewart N
Cognition; 2014 Jul; 132(1):44-56. PubMed ID: 24762922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The comparison process as an account of variation in the attraction, compromise, and similarity effects.
Cataldo AM; Cohen AL
Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Jun; 26(3):934-942. PubMed ID: 30264240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [A multi-measure analysis of the similarity, attraction, and compromise effects in multi-attribute decision making].
Tsuzuki T; Matsui H; Kikuchi M
Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 2012 Dec; 83(5):398-408. PubMed ID: 23379078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Not just for consumers: context effects are fundamental to decision making.
Trueblood JS; Brown SD; Heathcote A; Busemeyer JR
Psychol Sci; 2013 Jun; 24(6):901-8. PubMed ID: 23610134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Multi-attribute, multi-alternative models of choice: Choice, reaction time, and process tracing.
Cohen AL; Kang N; Leise TL
Cogn Psychol; 2017 Nov; 98():45-72. PubMed ID: 28843070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reversing the similarity effect: The effect of presentation format.
Cataldo AM; Cohen AL
Cognition; 2018 Jun; 175():141-156. PubMed ID: 29525692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Loss aversion and inhibition in dynamical models of multialternative choice.
Usher M; McClelland JL
Psychol Rev; 2004 Jul; 111(3):757-69. PubMed ID: 15250782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Multialternative decision by sampling: A model of decision making constrained by process data.
Noguchi T; Stewart N
Psychol Rev; 2018 Jul; 125(4):512-544. PubMed ID: 29952622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Value-based attentional capture affects multi-alternative decision making.
Gluth S; Spektor MS; Rieskamp J
Elife; 2018 Nov; 7():. PubMed ID: 30394874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Context effects in multi-alternative decision making: empirical data and a Bayesian model.
Hawkins G; Brown SD; Steyvers M; Wagenmakers EJ
Cogn Sci; 2012 Apr; 36(3):498-516. PubMed ID: 22257112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The 2N-ary Choice Tree Model for N-Alternative Preferential Choice.
Wollschläger LM; Diederich A
Front Psychol; 2012; 3():189. PubMed ID: 22723788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Similarity and number of alternatives in the random-dot motion paradigm.
van Maanen L; Grasman RP; Forstmann BU; Keuken MC; Brown SD; Wagenmakers EJ
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 May; 74(4):739-53. PubMed ID: 22287207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An attentional drift diffusion model over binary-attribute choice.
Fisher G
Cognition; 2017 Nov; 168():34-45. PubMed ID: 28646751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of anger and sadness on attentional patterns in decision making: an eye-tracking study.
Xing C
Psychol Rep; 2014 Feb; 114(1):50-67. PubMed ID: 24765709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The multiattribute linear ballistic accumulator model of context effects in multialternative choice.
Trueblood JS; Brown SD; Heathcote A
Psychol Rev; 2014 Apr; 121(2):179-205. PubMed ID: 24730597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. How similarity between choice options affects decisions from experience: The accentuation-of-differences model.
Spektor MS; Gluth S; Fontanesi L; Rieskamp J
Psychol Rev; 2019 Jan; 126(1):52-88. PubMed ID: 30604988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Examining the mechanisms underlying contextual preference reversal: Comment on Trueblood, Brown, and Heathcote (2014).
Tsetsos K; Chater N; Usher M
Psychol Rev; 2015 Oct; 122(4):838-47. PubMed ID: 26437153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. VAMP (Voting Agent Model of Preferences): A computational model of individual multi-attribute choice.
Bergner AS; Oppenheimer DM; Detre G
Cognition; 2019 Nov; 192():103971. PubMed ID: 31234078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Rigorously testing multialternative decision field theory against random utility models.
Berkowitsch NA; Scheibehenne B; Rieskamp J
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2014 Jun; 143(3):1331-48. PubMed ID: 24364681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Gaze-dependent evidence accumulation predicts multi-alternative risky choice behaviour.
Molter F; Thomas AW; Huettel SA; Heekeren HR; Mohr PNC
PLoS Comput Biol; 2022 Jul; 18(7):e1010283. PubMed ID: 35793388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
