These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2476294)

  • 41. Decomposition of working memory-related scalp ERPs: crossvalidation of fMRI-constrained source analysis and ICA.
    Wibral M; Turi G; Linden DE; Kaiser J; Bledowski C
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2008 Mar; 67(3):200-11. PubMed ID: 17692981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. [Theory of the EEG potential in models of the leptomeninges of the brain. IV. Radial dipoles and their double layers in the depths and on the surface of the brain].
    Gutman A; Shimoliunas A
    Biofizika; 1976; 21(5):898-904. PubMed ID: 1022252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Intracerebral and scalp fields evoked by hemiretinal checkerboard reversal, and modeling of their dipole generators.
    Lehmann D; Darcey TM; Skrandies W
    Adv Neurol; 1982; 32():41-8. PubMed ID: 7054964
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Validation of finite element model of transcranial electrical stimulation using scalp potentials: implications for clinical dose.
    Datta A; Zhou X; Su Y; Parra LC; Bikson M
    J Neural Eng; 2013 Jun; 10(3):036018. PubMed ID: 23649036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Topographic EEG analysis. Methods for graphic representation and clinical applications.
    Scarpino O; Guidi M; Bolcioni G
    Acta Neurol (Napoli); 1990 Oct; 12(5):410-26. PubMed ID: 2082724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. A theoretical justification of the average reference in topographic evoked potential studies.
    Bertrand O; Perrin F; Pernier J
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1985 Nov; 62(6):462-4. PubMed ID: 2415344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Localization of multiple dipoles: mathematical programming approaches.
    Pool KD; Aronofsky JS; Finitzo T; Barr RS
    Brain Topogr; 1989; 1(4):247-55. PubMed ID: 2641267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Effect of measurement noise and electrode density on the spatial resolution of cortical potential distribution with different resistivity values for the skull.
    Ryynänen OR; Hyttinen JA; Malmivuo JA
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Sep; 53(9):1851-8. PubMed ID: 16941841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Does combing the scalp reduce scalp electrode impedances?
    Mahajan Y; McArthur G
    J Neurosci Methods; 2010 May; 188(2):287-9. PubMed ID: 20211649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. An equivalent current source model and laplacian weighted minimum norm current estimates of brain electrical activity.
    He B; Yao D; Lian J; Wu D
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 Apr; 49(4):277-88. PubMed ID: 11942719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Electrodes.
    Morris HH; Lüders H
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl; 1985; 37():3-26. PubMed ID: 3859406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Global field power and topographic similarity.
    Skrandies W
    Brain Topogr; 1990; 3(1):137-41. PubMed ID: 2094301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Neonatal EEG at scalp is focal and implies high skull conductivity in realistic neonatal head models.
    Odabaee M; Tokariev A; Layeghy S; Mesbah M; Colditz PB; Ramon C; Vanhatalo S
    Neuroimage; 2014 Aug; 96():73-80. PubMed ID: 24736169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The effect of fontanel on scalp EEG potentials in the neonate.
    Gargiulo P; Belfiore P; Friðgeirsson EA; Vanhatalo S; Ramon C
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2015 Sep; 126(9):1703-10. PubMed ID: 25553851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. A new scaling method for topographical comparisons of event-related potentials.
    Jing H; Pivik RT; Dykman RA
    J Neurosci Methods; 2006 Mar; 151(2):239-49. PubMed ID: 16169597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Variability of electrode positions using electrode caps.
    Atcherson SR; Gould HJ; Pousson MA; Prout TM
    Brain Topogr; 2007; 20(2):105-11. PubMed ID: 17929157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Reference-free identification of components of checkerboard-evoked multichannel potential fields.
    Lehmann D; Skrandies W
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1980 Jun; 48(6):609-21. PubMed ID: 6155251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Resistor mesh model of a spherical head: part 2: a review of applications to cortical mapping.
    Chauveau N; Morucci JP; Franceries X; Celsis P; Rigaud B
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2005 Nov; 43(6):703-11. PubMed ID: 16594295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The weighted average reference montage.
    Lemos MS; Fisch BJ
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1991 Nov; 79(5):361-70. PubMed ID: 1718709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Topographic mapping of brain electromagnetic signals: a review of current technology.
    Brandt ME
    Am J Physiol Imaging; 1992; 7(3-4):160-74. PubMed ID: 1343213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.