187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24763173)
1. Limited evidence on treatments for distalising upper first molars in children and adolescents.
Flores-Mir C
Evid Based Dent; 2014 Mar; 15(1):23-4. PubMed ID: 24763173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Orthodontic treatment for distalising upper first molars in children and adolescents.
Jambi S; Thiruvenkatachari B; O'Brien KD; Walsh T
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 Oct; 2013(10):CD008375. PubMed ID: 24155018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Orthodontic treatment for prominent upper front teeth (Class II malocclusion) in children.
Thiruvenkatachari B; Harrison JE; Worthington HV; O'Brien KD
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 Nov; (11):CD003452. PubMed ID: 24226169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. One phase or two phase orthodontic treatment for Class II division 1 malocclusion ?
Veitz-Keenan A; Liu N
Evid Based Dent; 2019 Sep; 20(3):72-73. PubMed ID: 31562403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. One phase or two phases orthodontic treatment for Class II division 1 malocclusion?
Veitz-Keenan A; Liu N
Evid Based Dent; 2019 Jun; 20(2):56-57. PubMed ID: 31253968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Orthodontic treatment for prominent upper front teeth (Class II malocclusion) in children and adolescents.
Batista KB; Thiruvenkatachari B; Harrison JE; O'Brien KD
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2018 Mar; 3(3):CD003452. PubMed ID: 29534303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reinforcement of anchorage during orthodontic brace treatment with implants or other surgical methods.
Jambi S; Walsh T; Sandler J; Benson PE; Skeggs RM; O'Brien KD
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Aug; 2014(8):CD005098. PubMed ID: 25135678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Orthodontic treatment for prominent lower front teeth (Class III malocclusion) in children.
Watkinson S; Harrison JE; Furness S; Worthington HV
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 Sep; (9):CD003451. PubMed ID: 24085611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Orthodontic treatment for prominent upper front teeth in children.
Harrison JE; O'Brien KD; Worthington HV
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2007 Jul; (3):CD003452. PubMed ID: 17636724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effects of the pendulum distalising appliance and cervical headgear on the dentofacial structures.
Toy E; Enacar A
Aust Orthod J; 2011 May; 27(1):10-6. PubMed ID: 21696108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Anchorage effectiveness of orthodontic miniscrews compared to headgear and transpalatal arches: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Alharbi F; Almuzian M; Bearn D
Acta Odontol Scand; 2019 Mar; 77(2):88-98. PubMed ID: 30350741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Early orthodontic treatment reduced incisal trauma in children with class II malocclusions.
Kalha AS
Evid Based Dent; 2014 Mar; 15(1):18-20. PubMed ID: 24763171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reinforcement of anchorage during orthodontic brace treatment with implants or other surgical methods.
Skeggs RM; Benson PE; Dyer F
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2007 Jul; (3):CD005098. PubMed ID: 17636785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Facemask therapy between ages six to ten years may lead to short term improvements for Class III malocclusions.
Shadrick V; Walker M
Evid Based Dent; 2013 Dec; 14(4):112-3. PubMed ID: 24357823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Orthodontic treatment for crowded teeth in children.
Turner S; Harrison JE; Sharif FN; Owens D; Millett DT
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2021 Dec; 12(12):CD003453. PubMed ID: 34970995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Weak evidence supports the short-term benefits of orthopaedic treatment for Class III malocclusion in children.
Long H; Jian F; Lai W
Evid Based Dent; 2014 Mar; 15(1):21-2. PubMed ID: 24763172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Treatment effects of intraoral appliances with conventional anchorage designs for non-compliance maxillary molar distalization: a literature review.
Kinzinger GS; Eren M; Diedrich PR
Eur J Orthod; 2008 Dec; 30(6):558-71. PubMed ID: 18820306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quad-helix appliances may be more successful than removable expansion plates at correcting posterior crossbites.
O'Neill J
Evid Based Dent; 2015 Mar; 16(1):25-6. PubMed ID: 25909939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of two maxillary molar distalizing appliances with the distal jet.
Ferguson DJ; Carano A; Bowman SJ; Davis EC; Gutierrez Vega ME; Lee SH
World J Orthod; 2005; 6(4):382-90. PubMed ID: 16379210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Extraoral vs intraoral appliance for distal movement of maxillary first molars: a randomized controlled trial.
Bondemark L; Karlsson I
Angle Orthod; 2005 Sep; 75(5):699-706. PubMed ID: 16279817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
