303 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24763564)
1. Biomedical funding. At NIH, two strikes policy is out.
Kaiser J
Science; 2014 Apr; 344(6182):350. PubMed ID: 24763564
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Research funding. Politics and funding in the U.S. public biomedical R&D system.
Hegde D; Mowery DC
Science; 2008 Dec; 322(5909):1797-8. PubMed ID: 19095928
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. National Institutes of Health. Two strikes and you're out, grant applicants learn.
Kaiser J
Science; 2008 Oct; 322(5900):358. PubMed ID: 18927363
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Biomedical policy. Shrugging off doubters, NIH launches a new institute.
Kaiser J
Science; 2003 Jan; 299(5604):193-4. PubMed ID: 12522231
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Research funding. NIH in the post-doubling era: realities and strategies.
Zerhouni EA
Science; 2006 Nov; 314(5802):1088-90. PubMed ID: 17110557
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomedical research. NIH plans new grants for innovative minds.
Kaiser J
Science; 2003 Aug; 301(5635):902. PubMed ID: 12920271
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. NIH: gearing up for the twenty-first century.
Baldwin W; McCardle P
Physiologist; 1997 Jun; 40(3):89, 91-3. PubMed ID: 9230629
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. National Institutes of Health. Zerhouni's parting message: make room for young scientists.
Kaiser J
Science; 2008 Nov; 322(5903):834-5. PubMed ID: 18988813
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Research funding. Structural disequilibria in biomedical research.
Teitelbaum MS
Science; 2008 Aug; 321(5889):644-5. PubMed ID: 18669847
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Biomedical funding. A bumpy landing for cancer research.
Kaiser J
Science; 2004 Feb; 303(5660):936-7. PubMed ID: 14963292
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. U.S. budget 2009. NIH hopes for more mileage from roadmap.
Kaiser J
Science; 2008 Feb; 319(5864):716. PubMed ID: 18258872
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. U.S. science and austerity. Darwinism vs. social engineering at NIH.
Kaiser J
Science; 2011 Nov; 334(6057):753-4. PubMed ID: 22076357
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Iceberg alert for NIH.
Bourne HR; Lively MO
Science; 2012 Jul; 337(6093):390. PubMed ID: 22767896
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. NIH funding reform.
Strauss JF
Science; 2005 Aug; 309(5736):851. PubMed ID: 16081700
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. On incentives for innovation.
Alberts B
Science; 2009 Nov; 326(5957):1163. PubMed ID: 19965437
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. NIH needs a makeover.
Dey SK
Science; 2009 Aug; 325(5943):944. PubMed ID: 19696331
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Science policy. The NIH budget in the "postdoubling" era.
Korn D; Rich RR; Garrison HH; Golub SH; Hendrix MJ; Heinig SJ; Masters BS; Turman RJ
Science; 2002 May; 296(5572):1401-2. PubMed ID: 12029114
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. NIH budget. Peer review under stress.
Miller G; Couzin J
Science; 2007 Apr; 316(5823):358-9. PubMed ID: 17446364
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. NIH budget. Senate panel adds 16% to complete doubling.
Kaiser J
Science; 2002 Jul; 297(5581):493. PubMed ID: 12142502
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. NIH funding of the independent investigator.
Boron WF
Physiology (Bethesda); 2006 Oct; 21():300-1. PubMed ID: 16990450
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]