160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24763613)
21. [
Bauman G; Martin P; Thiessen JD; Taylor R; Moussa M; Gaed M; Rachinsky I; Kassam Z; Chin J; Pautler S; Lee TY; Valliant JF; Ward A
Eur Urol Focus; 2018 Sep; 4(5):702-706. PubMed ID: 28753797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. 18F-Fluorocholine PET/CT Complementing the Role of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI for Providing Comprehensive Diagnostic Workup in Prostate Cancer Patients With Suspected Relapse Following Radical Prostatectomy.
Vadi SK; Singh B; Basher RK; Watts A; Sood AK; Lal A; Kakkar N; Singh SK
Clin Nucl Med; 2017 Aug; 42(8):e355-e361. PubMed ID: 28525448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Final analysis of a prospective trial on functional imaging for nodal staging in patients with prostate cancer at high risk for lymph node involvement.
Van den Bergh L; Lerut E; Haustermans K; Deroose CM; Oyen R; Isebaert S; Budiharto T; Ameye F; Mottaghy FM; Bogaerts K; Van Poppel H; Joniau S
Urol Oncol; 2015 Mar; 33(3):109.e23-31. PubMed ID: 25655681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparative effectiveness of [(18) F]-fluorocholine PET-CT and pelvic MRI with diffusion-weighted imaging for staging in patients with high-risk prostate cancer.
Pinaquy JB; De Clermont-Galleran H; Pasticier G; Rigou G; Alberti N; Hindie E; Mokrane Y; Fernandez P
Prostate; 2015 Feb; 75(3):323-31. PubMed ID: 25393215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Evaluation of tumor recurrences after radical prostatectomy using 18F-Choline PET/CT and 3T multiparametric MRI without endorectal coil: a single center experience.
Couñago F; Recio M; Maldonado A; Del Cerro E; Díaz-Gavela AA; Thuissard IJ; Sanz-Rosa D; Marcos FJ; Olaciregui K; Mateo M; Cerezo L
Cancer Imaging; 2016 Dec; 16(1):42. PubMed ID: 27927229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Diagnostic Accuracy of
Hicks RM; Simko JP; Westphalen AC; Nguyen HG; Greene KL; Zhang L; Carroll PR; Hope TA
Radiology; 2018 Dec; 289(3):730-737. PubMed ID: 30226456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Preoperative prediction of neurovascular bundle involvement of localized prostate cancer by combined T2 and diffusion-weighted imaging of magnetic resonance imaging, number of positive biopsy cores, and Gleason score.
Naiki T; Okamura T; Nagata D; Mori Y; Kawai N; Ogawa K; Akita H; Hashimoto Y; Tozawa K; Kohri K
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2011; 12(4):909-13. PubMed ID: 21790224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Significant increase in detection of prostate cancer recurrence following radical prostatectomy with an early imaging acquisition protocol with ¹⁸F-fluorocholine positron emission tomography/computed tomography.
Simone G; Di Pierro GB; Papalia R; Sciuto R; Rea S; Ferriero M; Guaglianone S; Maini CL; Gallucci M
World J Urol; 2015 Oct; 33(10):1511-8. PubMed ID: 25577130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29.
Metser U; Berlin A; Halankar J; Murphy G; Jhaveri KS; Ghai S; Tau N
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Mar; 210(3):635-640. PubMed ID: 29323548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Combined magnetic resonance spectroscopy and dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging for prostate cancer detection.
Perdonà S; Di Lorenzo G; Autorino R; Buonerba C; De Sio M; Setola SV; Fusco R; Ronza FM; Caraglia M; Ferro M; Petrillo A
Urol Oncol; 2013 Aug; 31(6):761-5. PubMed ID: 21906966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Clinical utility of (18)F-fluorocholine positron-emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in biochemical relapse of prostate cancer after radical treatment: results of a multicentre study.
Rodado-Marina S; Coronado-Poggio M; García-Vicente AM; García-Garzón JR; Alonso-Farto JC; de la Jara AC; Maldonado-Suárez A; Rodríguez-Fernández A
BJU Int; 2015 Jun; 115(6):874-83. PubMed ID: 25307619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. 11C-choline positron-emission tomography/computed tomography and transrectal ultrasonography for staging localized prostate cancer.
Rinnab L; Blumstein NM; Mottaghy FM; Hautmann RE; Küfer R; Hohl K; Reske SN
BJU Int; 2007 Jun; 99(6):1421-6. PubMed ID: 17355373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Prospective Comparison of 99mTc-MDP Scintigraphy, Combined 18F-NaF and 18F-FDG PET/CT, and Whole-Body MRI in Patients with Breast and Prostate Cancer.
Minamimoto R; Loening A; Jamali M; Barkhodari A; Mosci C; Jackson T; Obara P; Taviani V; Gambhir SS; Vasanawala S; Iagaru A
J Nucl Med; 2015 Dec; 56(12):1862-8. PubMed ID: 26405167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and MRI-Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy for Index Tumor Detection: Correlation with Radical Prostatectomy Specimen.
Radtke JP; Schwab C; Wolf MB; Freitag MT; Alt CD; Kesch C; Popeneciu IV; Huettenbrink C; Gasch C; Klein T; Bonekamp D; Duensing S; Roth W; Schueler S; Stock C; Schlemmer HP; Roethke M; Hohenfellner M; Hadaschik BA
Eur Urol; 2016 Nov; 70(5):846-853. PubMed ID: 26810346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Introducing parametric fusion PET/MRI of primary prostate cancer.
Park H; Wood D; Hussain H; Meyer CR; Shah RB; Johnson TD; Chenevert T; Piert M
J Nucl Med; 2012 Apr; 53(4):546-51. PubMed ID: 22419751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Dynamic MRI and CAD vs. choline MRS: where is the detection level for a lesion characterisation in prostate cancer?
Schmuecking M; Boltze C; Geyer H; Salz H; Schilling B; Wendt TG; Kloetzer KH; Marx C
Int J Radiat Biol; 2009 Sep; 85(9):814-24. PubMed ID: 19701842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Detection of recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy: comparison of 11C-choline PET/CT with pelvic multiparametric MR imaging with endorectal coil.
Kitajima K; Murphy RC; Nathan MA; Froemming AT; Hagen CE; Takahashi N; Kawashima A
J Nucl Med; 2014 Feb; 55(2):223-32. PubMed ID: 24434294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Integrated 68Gallium Labelled Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen-11 Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Imaging Enhances Discriminatory Power of Multi-Parametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Al-Bayati M; Grueneisen J; Lütje S; Sawicki LM; Suntharalingam S; Tschirdewahn S; Forsting M; Rübben H; Herrmann K; Umutlu L; Wetter A
Urol Int; 2018; 100(2):164-171. PubMed ID: 29393268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Localising prostate cancer: comparison of endorectal magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and 3D-MR spectroscopic imaging with transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy.
Goris Gbenou MC; Peltier A; Addla SK; Lemort M; Bollens R; Larsimont D; Roumeguère T; Schulman CC; van Velthoven R
Urol Int; 2012; 88(1):12-7. PubMed ID: 22004874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [18F]fluoromethylcholine (FCH) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) for lymph node staging of prostate cancer: a prospective study of 210 patients.
Poulsen MH; Bouchelouche K; Høilund-Carlsen PF; Petersen H; Gerke O; Steffansen SI; Marcussen N; Svolgaard N; Vach W; Geertsen U; Walter S
BJU Int; 2012 Dec; 110(11):1666-71. PubMed ID: 22520686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
