232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24764205)
1. The effects of variable-time versus contingent reinforcement delivery on problem behavior maintained by escape.
Lomas Mevers JE; Fisher WW; Kelley ME; Fredrick LD
J Appl Behav Anal; 2014; 47(2):277-92. PubMed ID: 24764205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effects of variable-time delivery of food items and praise on problem behavior reinforced by escape.
Lomas JE; Fisher WW; Kelley ME
J Appl Behav Anal; 2010; 43(3):425-35. PubMed ID: 21358903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Competition between positive and negative reinforcement in the treatment of escape behavior.
Lalli JS; Vollmer TR; Progar PR; Wright C; Borrero J; Daniel D; Barthold CH; Tocco K; May W
J Appl Behav Anal; 1999; 32(3):285-96. PubMed ID: 10513025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Further examination of factors that influence preference for positive versus negative reinforcement.
Kodak T; Lerman DC; Volkert VM; Trosclair N
J Appl Behav Anal; 2007; 40(1):25-44. PubMed ID: 17471792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effects of differential negative reinforcement of other behavior and noncontingent escape on compliance.
Kodak T; Miltenberger RG; Romaniuk C
J Appl Behav Anal; 2003; 36(3):379-82. PubMed ID: 14596581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of positive and negative reinforcement for compliance to treat problem behavior maintained by escape.
Slocum SK; Vollmer TR
J Appl Behav Anal; 2015 Sep; 48(3):563-74. PubMed ID: 25969379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effects of fixed-time and contingent schedules of negative reinforcement on compliance and aberrant behavior.
Reed GK; Ringdahl JE; Wacker DP; Barretto A; Andelman MS
Res Dev Disabil; 2005; 26(3):281-95. PubMed ID: 15668078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Noncontingent escape as treatment for self-injurious behavior maintained by negative reinforcement.
Vollmer TR; Marcus BA; Ringdahl JE
J Appl Behav Anal; 1995; 28(1):15-26. PubMed ID: 7706146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Positive antecedent and consequent components in child compliance training.
Speights Roberts D; Tingstrom DH; Olmi DJ; Bellipanni KD
Behav Modif; 2008 Jan; 32(1):21-38. PubMed ID: 18096970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of fixed-time reinforcement schedules on resurgence of problem behavior.
Marsteller TM; St Peter CC
J Appl Behav Anal; 2014; 47(3):455-69. PubMed ID: 24844682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessment and treatment of problem behavior maintained by escape from attention and access to tangible items.
Hagopian LP; Wilson DM; Wilder DA
J Appl Behav Anal; 2001; 34(2):229-32. PubMed ID: 11421317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Functional communication training with and without alternative reinforcement and punishment: an analysis of 58 applications.
Rooker GW; Jessel J; Kurtz PF; Hagopian LP
J Appl Behav Anal; 2013 Dec; 46(4):708-22. PubMed ID: 24114463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Some effects of noncontingent positive reinforcement on multiply controlled problem behavior and compliance in a demand context.
Ingvarsson ET; Kahng S; Hausman NL
J Appl Behav Anal; 2008; 41(3):435-40. PubMed ID: 18816983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sound attenuation and preferred music in the treatment of problem behavior maintained by escape from noise.
Kettering TL; Fisher WW; Kelley ME; LaRue RH
J Appl Behav Anal; 2018 Jul; 51(3):687-693. PubMed ID: 29876921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effects of consequence manipulation during functional analysis of problem behavior maintained by negative reinforcement.
Potoczak K; Carr JE; Michael J
J Appl Behav Anal; 2007; 40(4):719-24. PubMed ID: 18189106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effect of rules on differential reinforcement of other behavior.
Watts AC; Wilder DA; Gregory MK; Leon Y; Ditzian K
J Appl Behav Anal; 2013; 46(3):680-4. PubMed ID: 24114232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Relations between rate of negative reinforcement and the persistence of task completion.
Romani PW; Ringdahl JE; Wacker DP; Lustig NH; Vinquist KM; Northup J; Kane AM; Carrion DP
J Appl Behav Anal; 2016 Mar; 49(1):122-37. PubMed ID: 26412807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Further evaluation of the high-probability instructional sequence with and without programmed reinforcement.
Wilder DA; Majdalany L; Sturkie L; Smeltz L
J Appl Behav Anal; 2015 Sep; 48(3):511-22. PubMed ID: 25998741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Choices between positive and negative reinforcement during treatment for escape-maintained behavior.
DeLeon IG; Neidert PL; Anders BM; Rodriguez-Catter V
J Appl Behav Anal; 2001; 34(4):521-5. PubMed ID: 11800194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Combining noncontingent reinforcement and differential reinforcement schedules as treatment for aberrant behavior.
Marcus BA; Vollmer TR
J Appl Behav Anal; 1996; 29(1):43-51. PubMed ID: 8881343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
