804 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24766094)
1. An evaluation of inferential procedures for adaptive clinical trial designs with pre-specified rules for modifying the sample size.
Levin GP; Emerson SC; Emerson SS
Biometrics; 2014 Sep; 70(3):556-67. PubMed ID: 24766094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. On efficient two-stage adaptive designs for clinical trials with sample size adjustment.
Liu Q; Li G; Anderson KM; Lim P
J Biopharm Stat; 2012; 22(4):617-40. PubMed ID: 22651105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Estimation in flexible two stage designs.
Brannath W; König F; Bauer P
Stat Med; 2006 Oct; 25(19):3366-81. PubMed ID: 16220489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Optimization of adaptive designs: efficiency evaluation.
Menon S; Chang M
J Biopharm Stat; 2012; 22(4):641-61. PubMed ID: 22651106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Adaptive Designs with Discrete Test Statistics and Consideration of Overrunning.
Schmidt R; Burkhardt B; Faldum A
Methods Inf Med; 2015; 54(5):434-46. PubMed ID: 26429500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Exact inference for adaptive group sequential designs.
Gao P; Liu L; Mehta C
Stat Med; 2013 Oct; 32(23):3991-4005. PubMed ID: 23686358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A note on P-values under group sequential testing and nonproportional hazards.
Gillen DL; Emerson SS
Biometrics; 2005 Jun; 61(2):546-51. PubMed ID: 16011703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A practical comparison of group-sequential and adaptive designs.
Kelly PJ; Sooriyarachchi MR; Stallard N; Todd S
J Biopharm Stat; 2005; 15(4):719-38. PubMed ID: 16022175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Efficient group sequential designs when there are several effect sizes under consideration.
Jennison C; Turnbull BW
Stat Med; 2006 Mar; 25(6):917-32. PubMed ID: 16220524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Exact confidence bounds following adaptive group sequential tests.
Brannath W; Mehta CR; Posch M
Biometrics; 2009 Jun; 65(2):539-46. PubMed ID: 18759843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of adaptive allocation rules for group-sequential binary response clinical trials.
Morgan CC; Stephen Coad D
Stat Med; 2007 Apr; 26(9):1937-54. PubMed ID: 16981177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Futility interim monitoring with control of type I and II error probabilities using the interim Z-value or confidence limit.
Lachin JM
Clin Trials; 2009 Dec; 6(6):565-73. PubMed ID: 19933716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Precision of maximum likelihood estimation in adaptive designs.
Graf AC; Gutjahr G; Brannath W
Stat Med; 2016 Mar; 35(6):922-41. PubMed ID: 26459506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sample size re-estimation for adaptive sequential design in clinical trials.
Gao P; Ware JH; Mehta C
J Biopharm Stat; 2008; 18(6):1184-96. PubMed ID: 18991116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Adaptive clinical trial designs with pre-specified rules for modifying the sample size: understanding efficient types of adaptation.
Levin GP; Emerson SC; Emerson SS
Stat Med; 2013 Apr; 32(8):1259-75; discussion 1280-2. PubMed ID: 23081665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Standard versus adaptive monitoring procedures: A commentary.
Fleming TR
Stat Med; 2006 Oct; 25(19):3305-12; discussion 3313-4, 3326-47. PubMed ID: 16850447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Some challenges with statistical inference in adaptive designs.
Hung HM; Wang SJ; Yang P
J Biopharm Stat; 2014; 24(5):1059-72. PubMed ID: 24915027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sample size re-estimation in group-sequential response-adaptive clinical trials.
Morgan CC
Stat Med; 2003 Dec; 22(24):3843-57. PubMed ID: 14673942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Estimation of a parameter and its exact confidence interval following sequential sample size reestimation trials.
Cheng Y; Shen Y
Biometrics; 2004 Dec; 60(4):910-8. PubMed ID: 15606411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Adaptive design and estimation in randomized clinical trials with correlated observations.
Yin G; Shen Y
Biometrics; 2005 Jun; 61(2):362-9. PubMed ID: 16011682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
