These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
440 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24767554)
1. Clinical comparison of the effectiveness of single-file reciprocating systems and rotary systems for removal of endotoxins and cultivable bacteria from primarily infected root canals. Martinho FC; Gomes AP; Fernandes AM; Ferreira NS; Endo MS; Freitas LF; Camões IC J Endod; 2014 May; 40(5):625-9. PubMed ID: 24767554 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Endodontic retreatment: clinical comparison of reciprocating systems versus rotary system in disinfecting root canals. Martinho FC; Freitas LF; Nascimento GG; Fernandes AM; Leite FR; Gomes AP; Camões IC Clin Oral Investig; 2015 Jul; 19(6):1411-7. PubMed ID: 25411081 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Does the Reciproc file remove root canal bacteria and endotoxins as effectively as multifile rotary systems? Marinho AC; Martinho FC; Gonçalves LM; Rabang HR; Gomes BP Int Endod J; 2015 Jun; 48(6):542-8. PubMed ID: 25070009 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. One-visit versus two-visit root canal treatment: effectiveness in the removal of endotoxins and cultivable bacteria. Xavier AC; Martinho FC; Chung A; Oliveira LD; Jorge AO; Valera MC; Carvalho CA J Endod; 2013 Aug; 39(8):959-64. PubMed ID: 23880258 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effectiveness in the Removal of Endotoxins and Microbiological Profile in Primary Endodontic Infections Using 3 Different Instrumentation Systems: A Randomized Clinical Study. Cavalli D; Toia CC; Flores Orozco EI; Khoury RD; Cardoso FGDR; Alves MC; Carvalho CAT; Valera MC J Endod; 2017 Aug; 43(8):1237-1245. PubMed ID: 28606669 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Micro-computed tomography study of oval-shaped canals prepared with the self-adjusting file, Reciproc, WaveOne, and ProTaper universal systems. Versiani MA; Leoni GB; Steier L; De-Deus G; Tassani S; Pécora JD; de Sousa-Neto MD J Endod; 2013 Aug; 39(8):1060-6. PubMed ID: 23880278 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Ex vivo evaluation of various instrumentation techniques and irrigants in reducing E. faecalis within root canals. Basmaci F; Oztan MD; Kiyan M Int Endod J; 2013 Sep; 46(9):823-30. PubMed ID: 23441862 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of two rotary systems in bacteria/lps removal from endodontic infections: randomized clinical trial. Machado CAD; Souza ACA; Loureiro C; Martinho FC; Cintra LTÂ; Dezan Junior E; Jacinto RC Braz Oral Res; 2019; 33():e039. PubMed ID: 31508729 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ex vivo evaluation of three instrumentation techniques on E. faecalis biofilm within oval shaped root canals. Nakamura VC; Candeiro GT; Cai S; Gavini G Braz Oral Res; 2015; 29():. PubMed ID: 25627890 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Shaping ability and cleaning effectiveness of two single-file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth: Reciproc and WaveOne versus Mtwo and ProTaper. Bürklein S; Hinschitza K; Dammaschke T; Schäfer E Int Endod J; 2012 May; 45(5):449-61. PubMed ID: 22188401 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of the efficacy of Smear Clear with and without a canal brush in smear layer and debris removal from instrumented root canal using WaveOne versus ProTaper: a scanning electron microscopic study. Kamel WH; Kataia EM J Endod; 2014 Mar; 40(3):446-50. PubMed ID: 24565669 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Efficacy of reciprocating instruments for removing filling material in curved canals obturated with a single-cone technique: a micro-computed tomographic analysis. Fruchi Lde C; Ordinola-Zapata R; Cavenago BC; Hungaro Duarte MA; Bueno CE; De Martin AS J Endod; 2014 Jul; 40(7):1000-4. PubMed ID: 24935552 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reduction in Enteroccocus faecalis counts - a comparison between rotary and reciprocating systems. Ferrer-Luque CM; Bejarano I; Ruiz-Linares M; Baca P Int Endod J; 2014 Apr; 47(4):380-6. PubMed ID: 23980811 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quantification of endotoxins and cultivable bacteria in root canal infection before and after chemomechanical preparation with 2.5% sodium hypochlorite. Martinho FC; Gomes BP J Endod; 2008 Mar; 34(3):268-72. PubMed ID: 18291273 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reciprocating versus rotary systems for root filling removal: assessment of the apically extruded material. Silva EJ; Sá L; Belladonna FG; Neves AA; Accorsi-Mendonça T; Vieira VT; De-Deus G; Moreira EJ J Endod; 2014 Dec; 40(12):2077-80. PubMed ID: 25442728 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Efficacy of 2 reciprocating systems compared with a rotary retreatment system for gutta-percha removal. Rios Mde A; Villela AM; Cunha RS; Velasco RC; De Martin AS; Kato AS; Bueno CE J Endod; 2014 Apr; 40(4):543-6. PubMed ID: 24666908 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of ultrasound streaming on the disinfection of flattened root canals prepared by rotary and reciprocating systems. Vasconcelos LRSM; Midena RZ; Minotti PG; Pereira TC; Duarte MAH; Andrade FB J Appl Oral Sci; 2017; 25(5):477-482. PubMed ID: 29069144 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of reciprocating single-file and rotary instrumentation on bacterial reduction on infected root canals. Machado ME; Nabeshima CK; Leonardo MF; Reis FA; Britto ML; Cai S Int Endod J; 2013 Nov; 46(11):1083-7. PubMed ID: 23566213 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Apically extruded debris with reciprocating single-file and full-sequence rotary instrumentation systems. Bürklein S; Schäfer E J Endod; 2012 Jun; 38(6):850-2. PubMed ID: 22595125 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical Antibacterial Effectiveness of Root Canal Preparation with Reciprocating Single-instrument or Continuously Rotating Multi-instrument Systems. Neves MA; Provenzano JC; Rôças IN; Siqueira JF J Endod; 2016 Jan; 42(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 26549221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]