These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2476767)
1. Do electrode and lead design differences for permanent cardiac pacing translate into clinically demonstrable differences? (Comparison of sintered platinum and activated vitreous and porous carbon electrodes). Bourke JP; Howell L; Murray A; Hill WE; Cowan JC; Beatt K; Errington J; Jameson S; Gold RG Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1989 Aug; 12(8):1419-25. PubMed ID: 2476767 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. "Are the differences between 'high performance' pacing leads clinically significant? A comparison of sintered platinum and activated carbon". Bourke JP; Jameson S; Howell L; Gold RG Int J Artif Organs; 1987 Jan; 10(1):61-5. PubMed ID: 3570545 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Long-term thresholds of nonsteroidal permanent pacing leads: a 5-year study. Gumbrielle TP; Bourke JP; Sinkovic M; Tynan M; Kittpawong P; Gold RG Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1996 May; 19(5):829-35. PubMed ID: 8734751 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Lower chronic stimulation threshold in the carbon-tip than in the platinum-tip endocardial electrode: a randomized study. Thuesen L; Jensen PJ; Vejby-Christensen H; Mortensen PT; Thomsen PE Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1989 Oct; 12(10):1592-5. PubMed ID: 2477813 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Steroid-tipped leads versus porous platinum permanent pacemaker leads: a controlled study. Wish M; Swartz J; Cohen A; Cohen R; Fletcher R Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1990 Dec; 13(12 Pt 2):1887-90. PubMed ID: 1704561 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Long-term performance of transvenous, steroid-eluting, high impedance, passive-fixation ventricular pacing leads. Yeh KH; Wang CC; Wen MS; Chou CC; Yeh SJ; Wu D Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2004 Oct; 27(10):1399-404. PubMed ID: 15511249 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Active fixation atrial leads: randomized comparison of two lead designs. Kay GN; Anderson K; Epstein AE; Plumb VJ Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1989 Aug; 12(8):1355-61. PubMed ID: 2476759 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A randomized controlled clinical study to quantify the effect of small changes in the design of pacing electrodes on threshold voltages. Murray A; Jameson S; Gold RG Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1995 Dec; 18(12 Pt 1):2150-4. PubMed ID: 8771126 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A fractally coated, 1.3 mm2 high impedance pacing electrode. Fröhlig G; Bolz A; Ströbel J; Rutz M; Lawall P; Schwerdt H; Schaldach M; Schieffer H Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1998 Jun; 21(6):1239-46. PubMed ID: 9633066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Activated pyrolytic carbon tip pacing leads: an alternative to steroid-eluting pacing leads? Masini M; Lazzari M; Lorenzoni R; Domicelli AM; Micheletti A; Dianda R; Masini G Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1996 Nov; 19(11 Pt 2):1832-5. PubMed ID: 8945051 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of platinized grooved electrode performance with ring-tip electrodes. Midei MG; Jones BR; Brinker JA Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1989 May; 12(5):752-6. PubMed ID: 2471160 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Telemetry guided pacemaker programming: impact of output amplitude and the use of low threshold leads on projected pacemaker longevity. Schwaab B; Fröhlig G; Schwerdt H; Heisel A; Berg M; Schieffer H Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1998 Nov; 21(11 Pt 1):2055-63. PubMed ID: 9826856 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Comparison of active and passive fixation of steroid emitting atrial electrodes]. Schuchert A; van Langen H; Michels K; Meinertz T Z Kardiol; 1996 Apr; 85(4):255-9. PubMed ID: 8693768 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Low pacing thresholds of ventricular pacemaker leads: not a marker for large R-wave amplitudes and high impedance values]. Schuchert A; Bornhoff S; Meinertz T Z Kardiol; 1995 Dec; 84(12):971-6. PubMed ID: 8578793 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Pacing threshold trends and variability in modern tined leads assessed using high resolution automatic measurements: conversion of pulse width into voltage thresholds. Danilovic D; Ohm OJ Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1999 Apr; 22(4 Pt 1):567-87. PubMed ID: 10234710 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Steroid eluting high impedance pacing leads decrease short and long-term current drain: results from a multicenter clinical trial. CapSure Z investigators. Ellenbogen KA; Wood MA; Gilligan DM; Zmijewski M; Mans D Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1999 Jan; 22(1 Pt 1):39-48. PubMed ID: 9990599 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A new efficient NanoTip lead. Stokes K; Bird T Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1990 Dec; 13(12 Pt 2):1901-5. PubMed ID: 1704564 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Experience with 407 transvenous, finned pacing leads with a sintered porous-surfaced electrode. Fananapazir L; Martin TS; Martin V; Slaven Y; Wilkinson K; Blane J; Bennett DH Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1984 Jan; 7(1):132-5. PubMed ID: 6199758 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]