464 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24768327)
1. Recall rate of screening ultrasound with automated breast volumetric scanning (ABVS) in women with dense breasts: a first quarter experience.
Arleo EK; Saleh M; Ionescu D; Drotman M; Min RJ; Hentel K
Clin Imaging; 2014; 38(4):439-444. PubMed ID: 24768327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of automated versus hand-held breast US in supplemental screening in asymptomatic women with dense breasts: is there a difference regarding woman preference, lesion detection and lesion characterization?
Tutar B; Esen Icten G; Guldogan N; Kara H; Arıkan AE; Tutar O; Uras C
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2020 May; 301(5):1257-1265. PubMed ID: 32215718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of handheld ultrasound and automated breast ultrasound in women recalled after mammography screening.
Hellgren R; Dickman P; Leifland K; Saracco A; Hall P; Celebioglu F
Acta Radiol; 2017 May; 58(5):515-520. PubMed ID: 27565633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Interobserver reliability of automated breast volume scanner (ABVS) interpretation and agreement of ABVS findings with hand held breast ultrasound (HHUS), mammography and pathology results.
Golatta M; Franz D; Harcos A; Junkermann H; Rauch G; Scharf A; Schuetz F; Sohn C; Heil J
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Aug; 82(8):e332-6. PubMed ID: 23540947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of an automated breast volume scanner according to the fifth edition of BI-RADS for breast ultrasound compared with hand-held ultrasound.
Choi EJ; Choi H; Park EH; Song JS; Youk JH
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Feb; 99():138-145. PubMed ID: 29362145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diagnostic Performance of Automated Breast Volume Scanning (ABVS) Compared to Handheld Ultrasonography With Breast MRI as the Gold Standard.
Schmachtenberg C; Fischer T; Hamm B; Bick U
Acad Radiol; 2017 Aug; 24(8):954-961. PubMed ID: 28336007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Outcomes of Return to Routine Screening for BI-RADS 3 Lesions Detected at Supplemental Automated Whole-Breast Ultrasound in Women With Dense Breasts: A Prospective Study.
Barr RG; DeSivestri A; Golatta M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Dec; 217(6):1313-1321. PubMed ID: 34259039
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The performance of 3D ABUS versus HHUS in the visualisation and BI-RADS characterisation of breast lesions in a large cohort of 1,886 women.
Vourtsis A; Kachulis A
Eur Radiol; 2018 Feb; 28(2):592-601. PubMed ID: 28828640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Screening US in patients with mammographically dense breasts: initial experience with Connecticut Public Act 09-41.
Hooley RJ; Greenberg KL; Stackhouse RM; Geisel JL; Butler RS; Philpotts LE
Radiology; 2012 Oct; 265(1):59-69. PubMed ID: 22723501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Automated breast ultrasound: lesion detection and BI-RADS classification--a pilot study.
Wenkel E; Heckmann M; Heinrich M; Schwab SA; Uder M; Schulz-Wendtland R; Bautz WA; Janka R
Rofo; 2008 Sep; 180(9):804-8. PubMed ID: 18704878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of 3D-Automated Breast Ultrasound With Handheld Breast Ultrasound Regarding Detection and BI-RADS Characterization of Lesions in Dense Breasts: A Study of 592 Cases.
Güldogan N; Yılmaz E; Arslan A; Küçükkaya F; Atila N; Arıbal E
Acad Radiol; 2022 Aug; 29(8):1143-1148. PubMed ID: 34955365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Automated breast volume scanning versus conventional ultrasound in breast cancer screening.
Xiao Y; Zhou Q; Chen Z
Acad Radiol; 2015 Mar; 22(3):387-99. PubMed ID: 25620036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The connecticut experiments second year: ultrasound in the screening of women with dense breasts.
Weigert J; Steenbergen S
Breast J; 2015; 21(2):175-80. PubMed ID: 25683369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Application of the downgrade criteria to supplemental screening ultrasound for women with negative mammography but dense breasts.
Kim SY; Kim MJ; Moon HJ; Yoon JH; Kim EK
Medicine (Baltimore); 2016 Nov; 95(44):e5279. PubMed ID: 27858896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Agreement Between an Automated Volume Breast Scanner and Handheld Ultrasound for Diagnostic Breast Examinations.
Barr RG; DeVita R; Destounis S; Manzoni F; De Silvestri A; Tinelli C
J Ultrasound Med; 2017 Oct; 36(10):2087-2092. PubMed ID: 28569407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of automated breast volume scanning and hand- held ultrasound in the detection of breast cancer: an analysis of 5,566 patient evaluations.
Choi WJ; Cha JH; Kim HH; Shin HJ; Kim H; Chae EY; Hong MJ
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014; 15(21):9101-5. PubMed ID: 25422185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diagnostic performance of combined use of automated breast volume scanning & hand-held ultrasound for breast lesions.
Liu J; Zhou Y; Wu J; Li P; Liang X; Duan H; Wu X; Hou X; Li X
Indian J Med Res; 2021 Aug; 154(2):347-354. PubMed ID: 35295015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Computer-Aided Diagnosis in Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Screening of Women With Extremely Dense Breasts to Reduce False-Positive Diagnoses.
Verburg E; van Gils CH; Bakker MF; Viergever MA; Pijnappel RM; Veldhuis WB; Gilhuijs KGA
Invest Radiol; 2020 Jul; 55(7):438-444. PubMed ID: 32149858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Supplemental Screening for Breast Cancer in Women With Dense Breasts: A Systematic Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.
Melnikow J; Fenton JJ; Whitlock EP; Miglioretti DL; Weyrich MS; Thompson JH; Shah K
Ann Intern Med; 2016 Feb; 164(4):268-78. PubMed ID: 26757021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
