523 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24768731)
1. Accurately measuring the quality and effectiveness of lumbar surgery in registry efforts: determining the most valid and responsive instruments.
Godil SS; Parker SL; Zuckerman SL; Mendenhall SK; Glassman SD; McGirt MJ
Spine J; 2014 Dec; 14(12):2885-91. PubMed ID: 24768731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accurately measuring the quality and effectiveness of cervical spine surgery in registry efforts: determining the most valid and responsive instruments.
Godil SS; Parker SL; Zuckerman SL; Mendenhall SK; McGirt MJ
Spine J; 2015 Jun; 15(6):1203-9. PubMed ID: 24076442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Defining the minimum clinically important difference for grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: insights from the Quality Outcomes Database.
Asher AL; Kerezoudis P; Mummaneni PV; Bisson EF; Glassman SD; Foley KT; Slotkin JR; Potts EA; Shaffrey ME; Shaffrey CI; Coric D; Knightly JJ; Park P; Fu KM; Devin CJ; Archer KR; Chotai S; Chan AK; Virk MS; Bydon M
Neurosurg Focus; 2018 Jan; 44(1):E2. PubMed ID: 29290132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Minimally invasive versus open fusion for Grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: analysis of the Quality Outcomes Database.
Mummaneni PV; Bisson EF; Kerezoudis P; Glassman S; Foley K; Slotkin JR; Potts E; Shaffrey M; Shaffrey CI; Coric D; Knightly J; Park P; Fu KM; Devin CJ; Chotai S; Chan AK; Virk M; Asher AL; Bydon M
Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Aug; 43(2):E11. PubMed ID: 28760035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Utility of minimum clinically important difference in assessing pain, disability, and health state after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.
Parker SL; Adogwa O; Paul AR; Anderson WN; Aaronson O; Cheng JS; McGirt MJ
J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 May; 14(5):598-604. PubMed ID: 21332281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Determining the quality and effectiveness of surgical spine care: patient satisfaction is not a valid proxy.
Godil SS; Parker SL; Zuckerman SL; Mendenhall SK; Devin CJ; Asher AL; McGirt MJ
Spine J; 2013 Sep; 13(9):1006-12. PubMed ID: 23685216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for grade I lumbar spondylolisthesis: 5-year follow-up from the prospective multicenter Quality Outcomes Database registry.
Chan AK; Bydon M; Bisson EF; Glassman SD; Foley KT; Shaffrey CI; Potts EA; Shaffrey ME; Coric D; Knightly JJ; Park P; Wang MY; Fu KM; Slotkin JR; Asher AL; Virk MS; Michalopoulos GD; Guan J; Haid RW; Agarwal N; Park C; Chou D; Mummaneni PV
Neurosurg Focus; 2023 Jan; 54(1):E2. PubMed ID: 36587409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Patient-reported outcomes 3 months after spine surgery: is it an accurate predictor of 12-month outcome in real-world registry platforms?
Parker SL; Asher AL; Godil SS; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
Neurosurg Focus; 2015 Dec; 39(6):E17. PubMed ID: 26621415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Surgical Resection of Intradural Extramedullary Spinal Tumors: Patient Reported Outcomes and Minimum Clinically Important Difference.
Zuckerman SL; Chotai S; Devin CJ; Parker SL; Stonko DP; Wick JB; Hale AT; McGirt MJ; Cheng JS
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2016 Dec; 41(24):1925-1932. PubMed ID: 27111764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Do measures of surgical effectiveness at 1 year after lumbar spine surgery accurately predict 2-year outcomes?
Adogwa O; Elsamadicy AA; Han JL; Cheng J; Karikari I; Bagley CA
J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Dec; 25(6):689-696. PubMed ID: 26722957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Two-year comprehensive medical management of degenerative lumbar spine disease (lumbar spondylolisthesis, stenosis, or disc herniation): a value analysis of cost, pain, disability, and quality of life: clinical article.
Parker SL; Godil SS; Mendenhall SK; Zuckerman SL; Shau DN; McGirt MJ
J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Aug; 21(2):143-9. PubMed ID: 24785973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Patient-reported outcomes after lumbar epidural steroid injection for degenerative spine disease in depressed versus non-depressed patients.
Kim EJ; Chotai S; Stonko DP; Wick JB; Schneider BJ; McGirt MJ; Devin CJ
Spine J; 2017 Apr; 17(4):511-517. PubMed ID: 27777051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Laminectomy alone versus fusion for grade 1 lumbar spondylolisthesis in 426 patients from the prospective Quality Outcomes Database.
Chan AK; Bisson EF; Bydon M; Glassman SD; Foley KT; Potts EA; Shaffrey CI; Shaffrey ME; Coric D; Knightly JJ; Park P; Wang MY; Fu KM; Slotkin JR; Asher AL; Virk MS; Kerezoudis P; Chotai S; DiGiorgio AM; Haid RW; Mummaneni PV
J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Nov; 30(2):234-241. PubMed ID: 30544348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Women fare best following surgery for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: a comparison of the most and least satisfied patients utilizing data from the Quality Outcomes Database.
Chan AK; Bisson EF; Bydon M; Glassman SD; Foley KT; Potts EA; Shaffrey CI; Shaffrey ME; Coric D; Knightly JJ; Park P; Fu KM; Slotkin JR; Asher AL; Virk MS; Kerezoudis P; Chotai S; DiGiorgio AM; Chan AY; Haid RW; Mummaneni PV
Neurosurg Focus; 2018 Jan; 44(1):E3. PubMed ID: 29290130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accurately measuring outcomes after surgery for adult Chiari I malformation: determining the most valid and responsive instruments.
Godil SS; Parker SL; Zuckerman SL; Mendenhall SK; McGirt MJ
Neurosurgery; 2013 May; 72(5):820-7; discussion 827. PubMed ID: 23381490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Modeled cost-effectiveness of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion compared with posterolateral fusion for spondylolisthesis using N(2)QOD data.
Carreon LY; Glassman SD; Ghogawala Z; Mummaneni PV; McGirt MJ; Asher AL
J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Jun; 24(6):916-21. PubMed ID: 26895529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and decompression alone for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.
Chan AK; Bisson EF; Bydon M; Glassman SD; Foley KT; Potts EA; Shaffrey CI; Shaffrey ME; Coric D; Knightly JJ; Park P; Wang MY; Fu KM; Slotkin JR; Asher AL; Virk MS; Kerezoudis P; Alvi MA; Guan J; Haid RW; Mummaneni PV
Neurosurg Focus; 2019 May; 46(5):E13. PubMed ID: 31042655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A Comparison of Minimally Invasive and Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Grade 1 Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: An Analysis of the Prospective Quality Outcomes Database.
Chan AK; Bisson EF; Bydon M; Foley KT; Glassman SD; Shaffrey CI; Wang MY; Park P; Potts EA; Shaffrey ME; Coric D; Knightly JJ; Fu KM; Slotkin JR; Asher AL; Virk MS; Kerezoudis P; Alvi MA; Guan J; Haid RW; Mummaneni PV
Neurosurgery; 2020 Sep; 87(3):555-562. PubMed ID: 32409828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An analysis from the Quality Outcomes Database, Part 1. Disability, quality of life, and pain outcomes following lumbar spine surgery: predicting likely individual patient outcomes for shared decision-making.
McGirt MJ; Bydon M; Archer KR; Devin CJ; Chotai S; Parker SL; Nian H; Harrell FE; Speroff T; Dittus RS; Philips SE; Shaffrey CI; Foley KT; Asher AL
J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Oct; 27(4):357-369. PubMed ID: 28498074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Follow-up score, change score or percentage change score for determining clinical important outcome following surgery? An observational study from the Norwegian registry for Spine surgery evaluating patient reported outcome measures in lumbar spinal stenosis and lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis.
Austevoll IM; Gjestad R; Grotle M; Solberg T; Brox JI; Hermansen E; Rekeland F; Indrekvam K; Storheim K; Hellum C
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2019 Jan; 20(1):31. PubMed ID: 30658613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
