These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

856 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24769385)

  • 41. Three-year clinical evaluation of class II posterior composite restorations placed with different techniques and flowable composite linings in endodontically treated teeth.
    Karaman E; Keskin B; Inan U
    Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Mar; 21(2):709-716. PubMed ID: 27538739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Randomized clinical trial of two resin-modified glass ionomer materials: 1-year results.
    Perdigão J; Dutra-Corrêa M; Saraceni SH; Ciaramicoli MT; Kiyan VH
    Oper Dent; 2012; 37(6):591-601. PubMed ID: 22770485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Class V lesions restored with four different tooth-colored materials--3-year results.
    Folwaczny M; Loher C; Mehl A; Kunzelmann KH; Hickel R
    Clin Oral Investig; 2001 Mar; 5(1):31-9. PubMed ID: 11355096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. A randomized controlled 30 years follow up of three conventional resin composites in Class II restorations.
    Pallesen U; van Dijken JW
    Dent Mater; 2015 Oct; 31(10):1232-44. PubMed ID: 26321155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Comparison of pattern of failure of resin composite restorations in non-carious cervical lesions with and without occlusal wear facets.
    Oginni AO; Adeleke AA
    J Dent; 2014 Jul; 42(7):824-30. PubMed ID: 24746714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations: 6-year results.
    Busato AL; Loguercio AD; Reis A; Carrilho MR
    Am J Dent; 2001 Oct; 14(5):304-8. PubMed ID: 11803995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Fracture resistance of premolar teeth restored with silorane-based or dimethacrylate-based composite resins.
    Akbarian G; Ameri H; Chasteen JE; Ghavamnasiri M
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2014; 26(3):200-7. PubMed ID: 24103086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Two-year clinical performance of self-etching adhesive systems in composite restorations of anterior teeth.
    Barcellos DC; Batista GR; Silva MA; Pleffken PR; Rangel PM; Fernandes VV; Di Nicoló R; Torres CR
    Oper Dent; 2013; 38(3):258-66. PubMed ID: 23110580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Two-year clinical evaluation of a packable resin-based composite.
    Türkün LS; Türkün M; Ozata F
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2003 Sep; 134(9):1205-12. PubMed ID: 14528992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Marginal and internal adaptation of bulk-filled Class I and Cuspal coverage direct resin composite restorations.
    Stavridakis MM; Kakaboura AI; Ardu S; Krejci I
    Oper Dent; 2007; 32(5):515-23. PubMed ID: 17910230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Evaluation of dental adhesive systems with amalgam and resin composite restorations: comparison of microleakage and bond strength results.
    Neme AL; Evans DB; Maxson BB
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(6):512-9. PubMed ID: 11203864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Marginal and internal adaptation of extended class I restorations lined with flowable composites.
    Haak R; Wicht MJ; Noack MJ
    J Dent; 2003 May; 31(4):231-9. PubMed ID: 12735916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Two-year clinical evaluation of packable and nanostructured resin-based composites placed with two techniques.
    Monteiro PM; Manso MC; Gavinha S; Melo P
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2010 Mar; 141(3):319-29. PubMed ID: 20194388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Four-year clinical evaluation of posterior resin-based composite restorations placed using the total-etch technique.
    Baratieri LN; Ritter AV
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2001; 13(1):50-7. PubMed ID: 11831309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Marginal quality of posterior microhybrid resin composite restorations applied using two polymerisation protocols: 5-year randomised split mouth trial.
    Barabanti N; Gagliani M; Roulet JF; Testori T; Ozcan M; Cerutti A
    J Dent; 2013 May; 41(5):436-42. PubMed ID: 23454329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Two-year clinical study on postoperative pulpal complications arising from the absence of a glass-ionomer lining in deep occlusal resin-composite restorations.
    Banomyong D; Messer H
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2013 Nov; 4(4):265-70. PubMed ID: 23355492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The effect of additional enamel etching and a flowable composite to the interfacial integrity of Class II adhesive composite restorations.
    Belli S; Inokoshi S; Ozer F; Pereira PN; Ogata M; Tagami J
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(1):70-5. PubMed ID: 11203780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. A 24-month clinical evaluation of composite resins with different viscosity and chemical compositions: a randomized clinical trial.
    Matos TP; Nuñez A; Méndez-Bauer M; Ñaupari-Villasante R; Barceleiro M; Duarte L; Reis A; Loguercio AD
    Quintessence Int; 2023 Mar; 54(3):186-199. PubMed ID: 36445776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Double-blind randomized clinical trial of posterior composite restorations with or without bevel: 6-month follow-up.
    Coelho-de-Souza FH; Klein-Júnior CA; Camargo JC; Beskow T; Balestrin MD; Demarco FF
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 Mar; 11(2):001-8. PubMed ID: 20228981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The effect of adhesive and flowable composite on postoperative sensitivity: 2-week results.
    Perdigão J; Anauate-Netto C; Carmo AR; Hodges JS; Cordeiro HJ; Lewgoy HR; Dutra-Corrêa M; Castilhos N; Amore R
    Quintessence Int; 2004; 35(10):777-84. PubMed ID: 15553285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 43.