These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1027 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24769386)

  • 1. Factors relating to usage patterns of amalgam and resin composite for posterior restorations--a prospective analysis.
    Khalaf ME; Alomari QD; Omar R
    J Dent; 2014 Jul; 42(7):785-92. PubMed ID: 24769386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Amalgam or composite resin? Factors influencing the choice of restorative material.
    Correa MB; Peres MA; Peres KG; Horta BL; Barros AD; Demarco FF
    J Dent; 2012 Sep; 40(9):703-10. PubMed ID: 22546263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Factors influencing dentists' choice of amalgam and tooth-colored restorative materials for Class II preparations in younger patients.
    Vidnes-Kopperud S; Tveit AB; Gaarden T; Sandvik L; Espelid I
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2009; 67(2):74-9. PubMed ID: 19085213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Black or white--Which choice for the molars? Part 2. Which does one choose for the restoration of posterior teeth: amalgam or composite?].
    De Moor R; Delmé K
    Rev Belge Med Dent (1984); 2008; 63(4):135-46. PubMed ID: 19227687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Posterior composites: Update on cavities and filling techniques.
    Sabbagh J; McConnell RJ; McConnell MC
    J Dent; 2017 Feb; 57():86-90. PubMed ID: 27889605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical longevity of extensive direct composite restorations in amalgam replacement: up to 3.5 years follow-up.
    Scholtanus JD; Ozcan M
    J Dent; 2014 Nov; 42(11):1404-10. PubMed ID: 24994619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dentists' restorative decision-making and implications for an 'amalgamless' profession. Part 4: clinical factor.
    Alexander G; Hopcraft MS; Tyas MJ; Wong R
    Aust Dent J; 2017 Sep; 62(3):363-371. PubMed ID: 28437002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In vivo and in vitro evaluations of microleakage around Class I amalgam and composite restorations.
    Alptekin T; Ozer F; Unlu N; Cobanoglu N; Blatz MB
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(6):641-8. PubMed ID: 21180003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Restorative material and other tooth-specific variables associated with the decision to repair or replace defective restorations: findings from The Dental PBRN.
    Gordan VV; Riley JL; Worley DC; Gilbert GH;
    J Dent; 2012 May; 40(5):397-405. PubMed ID: 22342563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A retrospective clinical study on longevity of posterior composite and amalgam restorations.
    Opdam NJ; Bronkhorst EM; Roeters JM; Loomans BA
    Dent Mater; 2007 Jan; 23(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 16417916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Use of lining materials under posterior resin composite restorations in the UK.
    Blum IR; Younis N; Wilson NH
    J Dent; 2017 Feb; 57():66-72. PubMed ID: 27988345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Teaching of direct posterior resin composite restorations in UK dental therapy training programmes.
    Lynch CD; Wilson NH
    Br Dent J; 2010 May; 208(9):415-21. PubMed ID: 20448613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Differences between reported and actual restored caries lesion depths: results from The Dental PBRN.
    Rindal DB; Gordan VV; Fellows JL; Spurlock NL; Bauer MR; Litaker MS; Gilbert GH
    Tex Dent J; 2014 Jul; 131(7):520-8. PubMed ID: 25265686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Direct composite resin fillings versus amalgam fillings for permanent or adult posterior teeth.
    Rasines Alcaraz MG; Veitz-Keenan A; Sahrmann P; Schmidlin PR; Davis D; Iheozor-Ejiofor Z
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Mar; (3):CD005620. PubMed ID: 24683067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Attitudes of some European dental undergraduate students to the placement of direct restorative materials in posterior teeth.
    Lynch CD; Guillem SE; Nagrani B; Gilmour AS; Ericson D
    J Oral Rehabil; 2010 Dec; 37(12):916-26. PubMed ID: 20557432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Longevity of restorations in posterior teeth and reasons for failure.
    Hickel R; Manhart J
    J Adhes Dent; 2001; 3(1):45-64. PubMed ID: 11317384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Selection of restorative materials, reasons for replacement, and longevity of restorations in Florida.
    Mjör IA; Moorhead JE
    J Am Coll Dent; 1998; 65(3):27-33. PubMed ID: 9805435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Amalgam and composite posterior restorations: curriculum versus practice in operative dentistry at a US dental school.
    Ottenga ME; Mjör I
    Oper Dent; 2007; 32(5):524-8. PubMed ID: 17910231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinicians' choices of restorative materials for children.
    Tran LA; Messer LB
    Aust Dent J; 2003 Dec; 48(4):221-32. PubMed ID: 14738124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical results and new developments of direct posterior restorations.
    Hickel R; Manhart J; García-Godoy F
    Am J Dent; 2000 Nov; 13(Spec No):41D-54D. PubMed ID: 11763918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 52.