These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

283 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24769675)

  • 1. [Epidemiology of bone and joint disease - the present and future - . Epidemiology of osteoporosis and osteoporotic fracture in Japan].
    Iki M
    Clin Calcium; 2014 May; 24(5):657-64. PubMed ID: 24769675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Trabecular bone score may improve FRAX® prediction accuracy for major osteoporotic fractures in elderly Japanese men: the Fujiwara-kyo Osteoporosis Risk in Men (FORMEN) Cohort Study.
    Iki M; Fujita Y; Tamaki J; Kouda K; Yura A; Sato Y; Moon JS; Winzenrieth R; Okamoto N; Kurumatani N
    Osteoporos Int; 2015 Jun; 26(6):1841-8. PubMed ID: 25752623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of different screening tools (FRAX®, OST, ORAI, OSIRIS, SCORE and age alone) to identify women with increased risk of fracture. A population-based prospective study.
    Rubin KH; Abrahamsen B; Friis-Holmberg T; Hjelmborg JV; Bech M; Hermann AP; Barkmann R; Glüer CC; Brixen K
    Bone; 2013 Sep; 56(1):16-22. PubMed ID: 23669650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Evaluation of osteoporotic fractures in the group of woman over 50 years of age--comparison of tools FRAX BMD versus FRAX BMI].
    Strugala C; Sobala W; Szubert Z; Hanke W
    Med Pr; 2013; 64(3):327-33. PubMed ID: 24261246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Probability of fractures predicted by FRAX® and observed incidence in the Spanish ECOSAP Study cohort.
    González-Macías J; Marin F; Vila J; Díez-Pérez A
    Bone; 2012 Jan; 50(1):373-7. PubMed ID: 22129640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Osteoporosis - whom to treat? The importance of FRAX® in Switzerland].
    Lippuner K
    Ther Umsch; 2012 Mar; 69(3):207-13. PubMed ID: 22403115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Clinical application of FRAX® in Japan].
    Hosoi T
    Clin Calcium; 2012 Jun; 22(6):857-63. PubMed ID: 22653025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Does Trabecular Bone Score (TBS) improve the predictive ability of FRAX
    Tamaki J; Iki M; Sato Y; Winzenrieth R; Kajita E; Kagamimori S;
    J Bone Miner Metab; 2019 Jan; 37(1):161-170. PubMed ID: 29468478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of the FRAX and Garvan fracture risk calculators in older women.
    Bolland MJ; Siu AT; Mason BH; Horne AM; Ames RW; Grey AB; Gamble GD; Reid IR
    J Bone Miner Res; 2011 Feb; 26(2):420-7. PubMed ID: 20721930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fracture Risk Assessment Tool May Not Indicate Bone Fragility in Women With Type 2 Diabetes.
    Ohira M; Suzuki S; Yoshida T; Koide H; Tanaka T; Tatsuno I
    Am J Med Sci; 2020 Nov; 360(5):552-559. PubMed ID: 32376002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Primary care use of FRAX: absolute fracture risk assessment in postmenopausal women and older men.
    Siris ES; Baim S; Nattiv A
    Postgrad Med; 2010 Jan; 122(1):82-90. PubMed ID: 20107292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fracture risk prediction using BMD and clinical risk factors in early postmenopausal women: sensitivity of the WHO FRAX tool.
    Trémollieres FA; Pouillès JM; Drewniak N; Laparra J; Ribot CA; Dargent-Molina P
    J Bone Miner Res; 2010 May; 25(5):1002-9. PubMed ID: 20200927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fracture risk prediction using phalangeal bone mineral density or FRAX(®)?-A Danish cohort study on men and women.
    Friis-Holmberg T; Rubin KH; Brixen K; Tolstrup JS; Bech M
    J Clin Densitom; 2014; 17(1):7-15. PubMed ID: 23623379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Is It Possible to Increase the Clinical Effectiveness of the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool in Osteopenia Patients by Taking Into Account Bone Mineral Density Values?
    Park JS; Lee J; Park YS
    J Clin Densitom; 2016; 19(3):340-5. PubMed ID: 26822485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of alendronate for reducing fracture by FRAX score and femoral neck bone mineral density: the Fracture Intervention Trial.
    Donaldson MG; Palermo L; Ensrud KE; Hochberg MC; Schousboe JT; Cummings SR
    J Bone Miner Res; 2012 Aug; 27(8):1804-10. PubMed ID: 22492479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Validation of the FRAX predictive model for major osteoporotic fracture in a historical cohort of Spanish women.
    Tebé Cordomí C; Del Río LM; Di Gregorio S; Casas L; Estrada MD; Kotzeva A; Espallargues M
    J Clin Densitom; 2013; 16(2):231-7. PubMed ID: 22748778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Preventing osteoporotic fractures in older people.
    McCloskey E
    Practitioner; 2011 Jan; 255(1736):19-22, 2-3. PubMed ID: 21370710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The characteristics of osteoporotic fractures in the region of Bialystok (BOS-2). The application of the WHO algorithm, FRAX®BMI and FRAX®BMD assessment tools to determine patients for intervention.
    Badurski J; Jeziernicka E; Dobreńko A; Nowak N; Daniluk S; Rybaczuk M; Wiśniowiecka M
    Endokrynol Pol; 2011; 62(4):290-8. PubMed ID: 21879467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Epidemiology and economic burden of osteoporosis in Switzerland.
    Svedbom A; Ivergård M; Hernlund E; Rizzoli R; Kanis JA
    Arch Osteoporos; 2014; 9():187. PubMed ID: 24970672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fracture burden in relation to low bone mineral density and FRAX(®) probability.
    Leslie WD; Morin S
    J Clin Densitom; 2011; 14(3):279-85. PubMed ID: 21723761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.