These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 247697)

  • 1. [Evaluation--a tool for development].
    Pettersen RT
    Sykepleien; 1978 May; 65(7):410-1. PubMed ID: 247697
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Developing a usable performance appraisal system.
    Brief AP
    J Nurs Adm; 1979 Oct; 9(10):7-10. PubMed ID: 258663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Employee development via performance reviews.
    Borkan S
    Quintessence Dent Technol; 1982 Jan; 6(1):75-9. PubMed ID: 6951228
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Personnel evaluation can solve many conflict situations].
    Vibjerg M; Rosenkvist S
    Sygeplejersken; 1980 Dec; 80(50):14-5. PubMed ID: 6908229
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Survival kit for managers. 8. Staff appraisal and development.
    Pincus J
    Nurs Mirror; 1982 Nov; 155(21):47-9. PubMed ID: 6924342
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Employee performance reviews that work.
    Riley M
    J Nurs Adm; 1983 Oct; 13(10):32-3. PubMed ID: 6555223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Employee performance evaluation and compensation review.
    Dumont B
    J Mich Dent Assoc; 1998 Feb; 80(2):32-3. PubMed ID: 9563322
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Performance appraisal model enforces guest relations.
    Hosp Guest Relations Rep; 1988 Jul; 3(7):1-4. PubMed ID: 10288150
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Performance reviews: discuss the job, not the employee.
    Levoy B
    Dent Econ; 1979 Apr; 69(4):87-8. PubMed ID: 296048
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A manager asks: "but the boss is always the boss".
    Health Care Manag (Frederick); 2003; 22(1):70-80. PubMed ID: 12688615
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The legal woes of appraising professional performance.
    Rozovsky LE; Rozovsky FA
    Can Oper Room Nurs J; 1987 Oct; 5(5):22-3. PubMed ID: 3676913
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Manitoba's CEO evaluation project.
    Steffan R
    Hosp Trustee; 1987; 11(4):5-6, 17. PubMed ID: 10282974
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Persons who associate with each other appreciate one another].
    Olesen K; Svendsen S
    Sygeplejersken; 1988 May; 88(18):20-3. PubMed ID: 3394050
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Let staff know how they're doing.
    Levoy B
    Dent Econ; 1989 Feb; 79(2):51-2. PubMed ID: 2599216
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Are your assistants in the dark about their jobs?
    Levoy B
    Dent Econ; 1979 Feb; 69(2):69-72. PubMed ID: 296038
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Coaching employees for success.
    Perry P
    Case Manager; 2001; 12(5):68-71. PubMed ID: 11552099
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluating nurse practitioner performance.
    Prescott PA; Driscoll L
    Nurse Pract; 1980; 5(4):28-9, 31-2, passim. PubMed ID: 7413111
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Development of a job-specific, criteria-based performance appraisal tool for staff pharmacists.
    Hoffman RP
    Hosp Pharm; 1986 Mar; 21(3):220-6. PubMed ID: 10275584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Managing employee performance.
    McConnell CR
    Health Care Manag (Frederick); 2004; 23(3):273-83. PubMed ID: 15457845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A checklist for evaluating administrators.
    Hosp Trustee; 1978; 2(5):5-8. PubMed ID: 10239699
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.