144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24770381)
1. Variable bone mineral density reductions post-unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.
Tuncer M; Patel R; Cobb JP; Hansen UN; Amis AA
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2015 Aug; 23(8):2230-2236. PubMed ID: 24770381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Periprosthetic bone mineral density changes after unicondylar knee arthroplasty.
Soininvaara TA; Harju KA; Miettinen HJ; Kröger HP
Knee; 2013 Mar; 20(2):120-7. PubMed ID: 23154036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Porous tantalum tibial component prevents periprosthetic loss of bone mineral density after total knee arthroplasty for five years-a matched cohort study.
Minoda Y; Kobayashi A; Ikebuchi M; Iwaki H; Inori F; Nakamura H
J Arthroplasty; 2013 Dec; 28(10):1760-4. PubMed ID: 23642446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Proximal tibial bone density is preserved after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.
Richmond BI; Hadlow SV; Lynskey TG; Walker CG; Munro JT
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2013 May; 471(5):1661-9. PubMed ID: 23325112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effect of the Oxford uncemented medial compartment arthroplasty on the bone mineral density and content of the proximal tibia.
Hooper GJ; Gilchrist N; Maxwell R; March R; Heard A; Frampton C
Bone Joint J; 2013 Nov; 95-B(11):1480-3. PubMed ID: 24151266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Medial peg position of cementless porous tantalum tibial component affects bone mineral density around the prosthesis after total knee arthroplasty: 2-year follow-up study.
Minoda Y; Ikebuchi M; Kobayashi A; Sugama R; Ohta Y; Takemura S; Yamamoto N; Nakamura H
Knee; 2022 Jan; 34():55-61. PubMed ID: 34875497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Denosumab prevents periprosthetic bone mineral density loss in the tibial metaphysis in total knee arthroplasty.
Murahashi Y; Teramoto A; Jimbo S; Okada Y; Kamiya T; Imamura R; Takashima H; Watanabe K; Nagoya S; Yamashita T
Knee; 2020 Mar; 27(2):580-586. PubMed ID: 31928902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Effect of Bone Quality on Tibial Component Migration in Medial Cemented Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty. A Prospective Cohort Study Using Dual X-Ray Absorptiometry and Radiostereometric Analysis.
Koppens D; Rytter S; Dalsgaard J; Sørensen OG; Hansen TB; Stilling M
J Arthroplasty; 2020 Mar; 35(3):675-682.e2. PubMed ID: 31732369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Tibial component coverage based on bone mineral density of the cut tibial surface during unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: clinical relevance of the prevention of tibial component subsidence.
Lee YS; Yun JY; Lee BK
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2014 Jan; 134(1):85-9. PubMed ID: 24276362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bone mineral density changes of the proximal tibia after revision total knee arthroplasty. A randomised study with the use of porous tantalum metaphyseal cones.
Jensen CL; Petersen MM; Schrøder HM; Lund B
Int Orthop; 2012 Sep; 36(9):1857-63. PubMed ID: 22733440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Underhang of the tibial component increases tibial bone resorption after total knee arthroplasty.
Gu S; Kuriyama S; Nakamura S; Nishitani K; Ito H; Matsuda S
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2019 Apr; 27(4):1270-1279. PubMed ID: 30470851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of bone density and cement morphology on biomechanical stability of tibial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.
Scheele CB; Pietschmann MF; Schröder C; Lenze F; Grupp TM; Müller PE
Knee; 2020 Mar; 27(2):587-597. PubMed ID: 32024609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Periprosthetic Loss of Bone Mineral Density After Cementless Porous Tantalum and Cemented Total Knee Arthroplasties: A Mean of 11-Year Concise Follow-Up of a Previous Report.
Minoda Y; Kobayashi A; Ikebuchi M; Iwaki H; Inori F; Nakamura H
J Arthroplasty; 2020 Nov; 35(11):3156-3160. PubMed ID: 32631727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bearing thickness of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty is a reliable predictor of tibial bone loss during revision to total knee arthroplasty.
Lo Presti M; Costa GG; Grassi A; Agrò G; Cialdella S; Vasco C; Neri MP; Cucurnia I; Zaffagnini S
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2020 May; 106(3):429-434. PubMed ID: 32253136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Do porous tantalum implants help preserve bone?: evaluation of tibial bone density surrounding tantalum tibial implants in TKA.
Harrison AK; Gioe TJ; Simonelli C; Tatman PJ; Schoeller MC
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2010 Oct; 468(10):2739-45. PubMed ID: 20066524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Rotational alignment errors can occur in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty if anatomical landmarks are misused: A preoperative CT scan analysis.
Makhdom AM; Kerr GJ; Wu E; Lonner JH
Knee; 2020 Jan; 27(1):242-248. PubMed ID: 31875837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of a double-layer cementing technique on the homogeneity of cementation and the generation of loose bone cement fragments in tibial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.
Scheele CB; Pietschmann MF; Schröder C; Suren C; Grupp TM; Müller PE
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2019 Nov; 20(1):539. PubMed ID: 31722711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Changes in bone mineral density of the proximal tibia after uncemented total knee arthroplasty. A prospective randomized study.
Winther N; Jensen C; Petersen M; Lind T; Schrøder H; Petersen M
Int Orthop; 2016 Feb; 40(2):285-94. PubMed ID: 26183139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of bone mineral density between porous tantalum and cemented tibial total knee arthroplasty components.
Minoda Y; Kobayashi A; Iwaki H; Ikebuchi M; Inori F; Takaoka K
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2010 Mar; 92(3):700-6. PubMed ID: 20194329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. No changes in bone mineral density following total knee arthroplasty using an all-polyethylene tibial component.
Ewen AM; Jeldi AJ; Welsh F; Picard F
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2024 Feb; 34(2):1057-1064. PubMed ID: 37907769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
