These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24771104)

  • 1. Exoelectrogenic biofilm as a template for sustainable formation of a catalytic mesoporous structure.
    Yates MD; Cusick RD; Ivanov I; Logan BE
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2014 Nov; 111(11):2349-54. PubMed ID: 24771104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Resilience, Dynamics, and Interactions within a Model Multispecies Exoelectrogenic-Biofilm Community.
    Prokhorova A; Sturm-Richter K; Doetsch A; Gescher J
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2017 Mar; 83(6):. PubMed ID: 28087529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Study of the mechanism of catalytic activity of G. sulfurreducens biofilm anodes during biofilm growth.
    Strycharz-Glaven SM; Tender LM
    ChemSusChem; 2012 Jun; 5(6):1106-18. PubMed ID: 22581467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Crystallographic orientation and electrode nature are key factors for electric current generation by Geobacter sulfurreducens.
    Maestro B; Ortiz JM; Schrott G; Busalmen JP; Climent V; Feliu JM
    Bioelectrochemistry; 2014 Aug; 98():11-9. PubMed ID: 24642203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. NanoSIMS imaging reveals metabolic stratification within current-producing biofilms.
    Chadwick GL; Jiménez Otero F; Gralnick JA; Bond DR; Orphan VJ
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2019 Oct; 116(41):20716-20724. PubMed ID: 31548422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Limitations for current production in Geobacter sulfurreducens biofilms.
    Bonanni PS; Bradley DF; Schrott GD; Busalmen JP
    ChemSusChem; 2013 Apr; 6(4):711-20. PubMed ID: 23417889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biofilm and nanowire production leads to increased current in Geobacter sulfurreducens fuel cells.
    Reguera G; Nevin KP; Nicoll JS; Covalla SF; Woodard TL; Lovley DR
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2006 Nov; 72(11):7345-8. PubMed ID: 16936064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Microtoming coupled to microarray analysis to evaluate the spatial metabolic status of Geobacter sulfurreducens biofilms.
    Franks AE; Nevin KP; Glaven RH; Lovley DR
    ISME J; 2010 Apr; 4(4):509-19. PubMed ID: 20033069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. On electron transport through Geobacter biofilms.
    Bond DR; Strycharz-Glaven SM; Tender LM; Torres CI
    ChemSusChem; 2012 Jun; 5(6):1099-105. PubMed ID: 22615023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reduction of palladium and production of nano-catalyst by Geobacter sulfurreducens.
    Pat-Espadas AM; Razo-Flores E; Rangel-Mendez JR; Cervantes FJ
    Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2013 Nov; 97(21):9553-60. PubMed ID: 23271671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Electricity-assisted biological hydrogen production from acetate by Geobacter sulfurreducens.
    Geelhoed JS; Stams AJ
    Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Jan; 45(2):815-20. PubMed ID: 21158443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Physiological stratification in electricity-producing biofilms of Geobacter sulfurreducens.
    Schrott GD; Ordoñez MV; Robuschi L; Busalmen JP
    ChemSusChem; 2014 Feb; 7(2):598-603. PubMed ID: 24307451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Microbial biofilm voltammetry: direct electrochemical characterization of catalytic electrode-attached biofilms.
    Marsili E; Rollefson JB; Baron DB; Hozalski RM; Bond DR
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2008 Dec; 74(23):7329-37. PubMed ID: 18849456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Power output and columbic efficiencies from biofilms of Geobacter sulfurreducens comparable to mixed community microbial fuel cells.
    Nevin KP; Richter H; Covalla SF; Johnson JP; Woodard TL; Orloff AL; Jia H; Zhang M; Lovley DR
    Environ Microbiol; 2008 Oct; 10(10):2505-14. PubMed ID: 18564184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Spatially resolved confocal resonant Raman microscopic analysis of anode-grown Geobacter sulfurreducens biofilms.
    Lebedev N; Strycharz-Glaven SM; Tender LM
    Chemphyschem; 2014 Feb; 15(2):320-7. PubMed ID: 24402861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The performance of a microbial fuel cell depends strongly on anode geometry: a multidimensional modeling study.
    Merkey BV; Chopp DL
    Bull Math Biol; 2012 Apr; 74(4):834-57. PubMed ID: 22015479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of surface roughness, biofilm coverage and biofilm structure on the electrochemical efficiency of microbial cathodes.
    Pons L; Délia ML; Bergel A
    Bioresour Technol; 2011 Feb; 102(3):2678-83. PubMed ID: 21131196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Thickness and roughness of transparent gold-palladium anodes have no impact on growth kinetics and yield coefficients of early-stage Geobacter sulfurreducens biofilms.
    Scarabotti F; Bühler K; Schmidt M; Harnisch F
    Bioelectrochemistry; 2022 Apr; 144():108043. PubMed ID: 34959027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of anode potentials on selection of Geobacter strains in microbial electrolysis cells.
    Commault AS; Lear G; Packer MA; Weld RJ
    Bioresour Technol; 2013 Jul; 139():226-34. PubMed ID: 23665518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The study of electrochemically active microbial biofilms on different carbon-based anode materials in microbial fuel cells.
    Liu Y; Harnisch F; Fricke K; Schröder U; Climent V; Feliu JM
    Biosens Bioelectron; 2010 May; 25(9):2167-71. PubMed ID: 20189793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.