These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
8. Comparison of the utility of Pascal dynamic contour tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry in routine clinical practice. Anderson MF; Agius-Fernandez A; Kaye SB J Glaucoma; 2013; 22(5):422-6. PubMed ID: 22407393 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Clinical assessment of dynamic contour tonometer]. Shi W; Zhong Y; Dong FT; Xu P; Wang RY Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2008 May; 44(5):408-12. PubMed ID: 18953894 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of intraocular pressure measured by Pascal dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry. Ku JY; Danesh-Meyer HV; Craig JP; Gamble GD; McGhee CN Eye (Lond); 2006 Feb; 20(2):191-8. PubMed ID: 15803173 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Reproducibility of dynamic contour tonometry. Comparison with TonoPenXL and Goldmann applanation tonometry - a clinical study on 323 normal eyes]. Viestenz A; Langenbucher A; Viestenz A Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2006 Oct; 223(10):813-9. PubMed ID: 17063423 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Spectral analysis of intraocular pressure pulse wave in open angle glaucomas and healthy eyes. Božić M; Dukić ML; Stojković M Curr Eye Res; 2012 Nov; 37(11):1019-24. PubMed ID: 22730930 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [How does central cornea thickness influence intraocular pressure during applanation and contour tonometry?]. Schwenteck T; Knappe M; Moros I Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2012 Sep; 229(9):917-27. PubMed ID: 22972357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Intraocular pressure measurement precision with the Goldmann applanation, dynamic contour, and ocular response analyzer tonometers. Kotecha A; White E; Schlottmann PG; Garway-Heath DF Ophthalmology; 2010 Apr; 117(4):730-7. PubMed ID: 20122737 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Correlation between diurnal variation of intraocular pressure, ocular pulse amplitude and corneal structural properties. Villas-Bôas FS; Doi LM; Sousa AK; Melo LA Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2009; 72(3):296-301. PubMed ID: 19668956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Repeatability and reproducibility for intraocular pressure measurement by dynamic contour, ocular response analyzer, and goldmann applanation tonometry. Sullivan-Mee M; Gerhardt G; Halverson KD; Qualls C J Glaucoma; 2009 Dec; 18(9):666-73. PubMed ID: 20010245 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessment of factors affecting the difference in intraocular pressure measurements between dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry. Wang J; Cayer MM; Descovich D; Kamdeu-Fansi A; Harasymowycz PJ; Li G; Lesk MR J Glaucoma; 2011 Oct; 20(8):482-7. PubMed ID: 21048515 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]