These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24771662)
21. Performance of propensity score methods when comparison groups originate from different data sources. Hammill BG; Curtis LH; Setoguchi S Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2012 May; 21 Suppl 2():81-9. PubMed ID: 22552983 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The performance of inverse probability of treatment weighting and full matching on the propensity score in the presence of model misspecification when estimating the effect of treatment on survival outcomes. Austin PC; Stuart EA Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Aug; 26(4):1654-1670. PubMed ID: 25934643 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Combining propensity score-based stratification and weighting to improve causal inference in the evaluation of health care interventions. Linden A J Eval Clin Pract; 2014 Dec; 20(6):1065-71. PubMed ID: 25266868 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The Comparison of Latent Variable Propensity Score Models to Traditional Propensity Score Models under Conditions of Covariate Unreliability. Whittaker TA Multivariate Behav Res; 2020; 55(4):625-646. PubMed ID: 31530179 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Sample size adjustments for varying cluster sizes in cluster randomized trials with binary outcomes analyzed with second-order PQL mixed logistic regression. Candel MJ; Van Breukelen GJ Stat Med; 2010 Jun; 29(14):1488-501. PubMed ID: 20101669 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Immediate efficacy of neuromuscular exercise in patients with severe osteoarthritis of the hip or knee: a secondary analysis from a randomized controlled trial. Villadsen A; Overgaard S; Holsgaard-Larsen A; Christensen R; Roos EM J Rheumatol; 2014 Jul; 41(7):1385-94. PubMed ID: 24931956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. On the use of propensity scores in case of rare exposure. Hajage D; Tubach F; Steg PG; Bhatt DL; De Rycke Y BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Mar; 16():38. PubMed ID: 27036963 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Leveraging baseline covariates to analyze small cluster-randomized trials with a rare binary outcome. Zhu AY; Mitra N; Hemming K; Harhay MO; Li F Biom J; 2024 Jan; 66(1):e2200135. PubMed ID: 37035941 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The performance of different propensity-score methods for estimating differences in proportions (risk differences or absolute risk reductions) in observational studies. Austin PC Stat Med; 2010 Sep; 29(20):2137-48. PubMed ID: 20108233 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A comparison of approaches for stratifying on the propensity score to reduce bias. Linden A J Eval Clin Pract; 2017 Aug; 23(4):690-696. PubMed ID: 28074629 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Propensity score methods and regression adjustment for analysis of nonrandomized studies with health-related quality of life outcomes. Cottone F; Anota A; Bonnetain F; Collins GS; Efficace F Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2019 May; 28(5):690-699. PubMed ID: 30784132 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The performance of different propensity score methods for estimating absolute effects of treatments on survival outcomes: A simulation study. Austin PC; Schuster T Stat Methods Med Res; 2016 Oct; 25(5):2214-2237. PubMed ID: 24463885 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Cluster size variability and imbalance in cluster randomized controlled trials. Carter B Stat Med; 2010 Dec; 29(29):2984-93. PubMed ID: 20963749 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Statistical power in parallel group point exposure studies with time-to-event outcomes: an empirical comparison of the performance of randomized controlled trials and the inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) approach. Austin PC; Schuster T; Platt RW BMC Med Res Methodol; 2015 Oct; 15():87. PubMed ID: 26472109 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. An evaluation of constrained randomization for the design and analysis of group-randomized trials with binary outcomes. Li F; Turner EL; Heagerty PJ; Murray DM; Vollmer WM; DeLong ER Stat Med; 2017 Oct; 36(24):3791-3806. PubMed ID: 28786223 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Propensity Score: an Alternative Method of Analyzing Treatment Effects. Kuss O; Blettner M; Börgermann J Dtsch Arztebl Int; 2016 Sep; 113(35-36):597-603. PubMed ID: 27658473 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Studies with many covariates and few outcomes: selecting covariates and implementing propensity-score-based confounding adjustments. Patorno E; Glynn RJ; Hernández-Díaz S; Liu J; Schneeweiss S Epidemiology; 2014 Mar; 25(2):268-78. PubMed ID: 24487209 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Estimating adjusted NNTs in randomised controlled trials with binary outcomes: a simulation study. Bender R; Vervölgyi V Contemp Clin Trials; 2010 Sep; 31(5):498-505. PubMed ID: 20624484 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Magnitude and direction of missing confounders had different consequences on treatment effect estimation in propensity score analysis. Nguyen TL; Collins GS; Spence J; Fontaine C; Daurès JP; Devereaux PJ; Landais P; Le Manach Y J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Jul; 87():87-97. PubMed ID: 28412467 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]