These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24771970)

  • 1. Comparative evaluation of Ferric Sulfate, Electrosurgical and Diode Laser on human primary molars pulpotomy: an "in-vivo" study.
    Yadav P; Indushekar K; Saraf B; Sheoran N; Sardana D
    Laser Ther; 2014 Mar; 23(1):41-7. PubMed ID: 24771970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparative Evaluation of Low-level Diode Laser and Electrosurgical Pulpotomy in Primary Molars.
    Roy S; Garg N; Pathivada L; Choudhary R; Kaur H; Yeluri R
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2023; 16(4):612-618. PubMed ID: 37731801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative Evaluation of Amniotic Membrane Derivative, Chitosan with Mineral Trioxide Aggregate, Diode Laser, and Ferric Sulfate as Pulpotomy Agents in Human Primary Molars: An
    Lahoti VC; Lahoti P; Gundreddy LM; Puppala R; Sandeep V; Kethineni B
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2024 Feb; 17(2):153-157. PubMed ID: 39184892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical and radiographic comparison of primary molars after formocresol and electrosurgical pulpotomy: a randomized clinical trial.
    Bahrololoomi Z; Moeintaghavi A; Emtiazi M; Hosseini G
    Indian J Dent Res; 2008; 19(3):219-23. PubMed ID: 18797098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Laser Pulpotomy-An Effective Alternative to Conventional Techniques: A 12 Months Clinicoradiographic Study.
    Gupta G; Rana V; Srivastava N; Chandna P
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2015; 8(1):18-21. PubMed ID: 26124576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Outcome comparison between diode laser pulpotomy and formocresol pulpotomy on human primary molars.
    Pei SL; Shih WY; Liu JF
    J Dent Sci; 2020 Jun; 15(2):163-167. PubMed ID: 32595896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical outcomes for primary molars treated by different types of pulpotomy: A retrospective cohort study.
    Kuo HY; Lin JR; Huang WH; Chiang ML
    J Formos Med Assoc; 2018 Jan; 117(1):24-33. PubMed ID: 28325624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In vivo evaluation of the treatment outcome of pulpotomy in primary molars using diode laser, formocresol, and ferric sulphate.
    Durmus B; Tanboga I
    Photomed Laser Surg; 2014 May; 32(5):289-95. PubMed ID: 24717147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Retrospective analysis of ferric sulfate and sodium hypochlorite pulpotomy procedures in primary molars.
    Akman H; Surme K
    J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects; 2023; 17(3):182-187. PubMed ID: 38023801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of diode laser pulpotomy on human primary teeth.
    Ansari G; Chitsazan A; Fekrazad R; Javadi F
    Laser Ther; 2018 Sep; 27(3):187-192. PubMed ID: 32158064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of long-term outcomes between ferric sulfate pulpotomy and indirect pulp therapy in primary molars.
    Fang RR; Chang KY; Lin YT; Lin YJ
    J Dent Sci; 2019 Jun; 14(2):134-137. PubMed ID: 31205604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of three pulpotomy agents in primary molars: a randomised clinical trial.
    Farrokh Gisoure E
    Iran Endod J; 2011; 6(1):11-4. PubMed ID: 23130049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13.
    Hugar SM; Reddy R; Deshpande SD; Shigli A; Gokhale NS; Hugar SS
    Contemp Clin Dent; 2017; 8(1):122-127. PubMed ID: 28566863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical Evaluation of Low Level Diode Laser Application For Primary Teeth Pulpotomy.
    Uloopi KS; Vinay C; Ratnaditya A; Gopal AS; Mrudula KJ; Rao RC
    J Clin Diagn Res; 2016 Jan; 10(1):ZC67-70. PubMed ID: 26894180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of Clinical and Radiographic Success Rates of Pulpotomy in Primary Molars using Ferric Sulfate and Bioactive Tricalcium Silicate Cement: An
    Sirohi K; Marwaha M; Gupta A; Bansal K; Srivastava A
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2017; 10(2):147-151. PubMed ID: 28890614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical and radiographic comparison of various medicaments used for pulpotomy in primary molars: A randomized clinical trial.
    Goyal P; Pandit IK; Gugnani N; Gupta M; Goel R; Gambhir RS
    Eur J Dent; 2016; 10(3):315-320. PubMed ID: 27403046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Long-term effectiveness of four pulpotomy techniques: 3-year randomised controlled trial.
    Huth KC; Hajek-Al-Khatar N; Wolf P; Ilie N; Hickel R; Paschos E
    Clin Oral Investig; 2012 Aug; 16(4):1243-50. PubMed ID: 21842145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of a novel alternative to conventional formocresol-zinc oxide eugenol pulpotomy for the treatment of pulpally involved human primary teeth: diode laser-mineral trioxide aggregate pulpotomy.
    Saltzman B; Sigal M; Clokie C; Rukavina J; Titley K; Kulkarni GV
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 2005 Nov; 15(6):437-47. PubMed ID: 16238654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of electrosurgical pulpotomy with zinc oxide eugenol or zinc polycarboxylate cements sub-base.
    Nematollahi H; Sahebnasagh M; Parisay I
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2011; 36(2):133-7. PubMed ID: 22524073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Two-year outcomes of electrosurgery and calcium-enriched mixture pulpotomy in primary teeth: a randomised clinical trial.
    Khorakian F; Mazhari F; Asgary S; Sahebnasagh M; Alizadeh Kaseb A; Movahhed T; Sarraf Shirazi AR
    Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2014 Aug; 15(4):223-8. PubMed ID: 24435546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.