These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

53 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24773361)

  • 1. Meta-analysis of the accuracy of tools used for binary classification when the primary studies employ different references.
    Botella J; Huang H; Suero M
    Psychol Methods; 2015 Sep; 20(3):331-41. PubMed ID: 24773361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Procedures for performing meta-analyses of the accuracy of tools for binary classification].
    Botella J; Huang H
    Psicothema; 2012 Feb; 24(1):133-41. PubMed ID: 22269376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Multinomial tree models for assessing the status of the reference in studies of the accuracy of tools for binary classification.
    Botella J; Huang H; Suero M
    Front Psychol; 2013; 4():694. PubMed ID: 24106484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bayesian meta-analysis of diagnostic tests allowing for imperfect reference standards.
    Menten J; Boelaert M; Lesaffre E
    Stat Med; 2013 Dec; 32(30):5398-413. PubMed ID: 24003003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Likelihood-Based Random-Effect Meta-Analysis of Binary Events.
    Amatya A; Bhaumik DK; Normand SL; Greenhouse J; Kaizar E; Neelon B; Gibbons RD
    J Biopharm Stat; 2015; 25(5):984-1004. PubMed ID: 24918874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bayesian meta-analysis of test accuracy in the absence of a perfect reference test applied to bone scintigraphy for the diagnosis of complex regional pain syndrome.
    Held U; Brunner F; Steurer J; Wertli MM
    Biom J; 2015 Nov; 57(6):1020-37. PubMed ID: 26479506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Adjusting for partial verification or workup bias in meta-analyses of diagnostic accuracy studies.
    de Groot JA; Dendukuri N; Janssen KJ; Reitsma JB; Brophy J; Joseph L; Bossuyt PM; Moons KG
    Am J Epidemiol; 2012 Apr; 175(8):847-53. PubMed ID: 22422923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Meta-analyses triggered by previous (false-)significant findings: problems and solutions.
    Schuit E; Roes KC; Mol BW; Kwee A; Moons KG; Groenwold RH
    Syst Rev; 2015 Apr; 4():57. PubMed ID: 25908184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Meta-analysis of the Italian studies on short-term effects of air pollution].
    Biggeri A; Bellini P; Terracini B;
    Epidemiol Prev; 2001; 25(2 Suppl):1-71. PubMed ID: 11515188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of the SCOFF.
    Botella J; Sepúlveda AR; Huang H; Gambara H
    Span J Psychol; 2013; 16():E92. PubMed ID: 24230955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Four-fold table cell frequencies imputation in meta analysis.
    Di Pietrantonj C
    Stat Med; 2006 Jul; 25(13):2299-322. PubMed ID: 16025540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of dependent errors in the assessment of diagnostic or screening test accuracy when the reference standard is imperfect.
    Walter SD; Macaskill P; Lord SJ; Irwig L
    Stat Med; 2012 May; 31(11-12):1129-38. PubMed ID: 22351623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A review of solutions for diagnostic accuracy studies with an imperfect or missing reference standard.
    Reitsma JB; Rutjes AW; Khan KS; Coomarasamy A; Bossuyt PM
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Aug; 62(8):797-806. PubMed ID: 19447581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Statistical analysis and design for estimating accuracy in clinical-center classification of cause-specific clinical events in clinical trials.
    Yan G; Greene T
    Clin Trials; 2011 Oct; 8(5):571-80. PubMed ID: 22013170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Estimating the proportion of studies missing for meta-analysis due to publication bias.
    Formann AK
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2008 Sep; 29(5):732-9. PubMed ID: 18586577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Empirical Bayes estimates generated in a hierarchical summary ROC analysis agreed closely with those of a full Bayesian analysis.
    Macaskill P
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2004 Sep; 57(9):925-32. PubMed ID: 15504635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Individual patient data meta-analysis of diagnostic studies: opportunities and challenges.
    Ter Riet G; Bachmann LM; Kessels AG; Khan KS
    Evid Based Med; 2013 Oct; 18(5):165-9. PubMed ID: 23704701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Updating meta-analytic research findings: Bayesian approaches versus the medical model.
    Schmidt FL; Raju NS
    J Appl Psychol; 2007 Mar; 92(2):297-308. PubMed ID: 17371079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy.
    Leeflang MM
    Clin Microbiol Infect; 2014 Feb; 20(2):105-13. PubMed ID: 24274632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Methods for the joint meta-analysis of multiple tests.
    Trikalinos TA; Hoaglin DC; Small KM; Terrin N; Schmid CH
    Res Synth Methods; 2014 Dec; 5(4):294-312. PubMed ID: 26052954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.