286 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24773446)
1. Pulse pressure variation to predict fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing patients: tidal vs. forced inspiratory breathing.
Hong DM; Lee JM; Seo JH; Min JJ; Jeon Y; Bahk JH
Anaesthesia; 2014 Jul; 69(7):717-22. PubMed ID: 24773446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prediction of fluid responsiveness in acute respiratory distress syndrome patients ventilated with low tidal volume and high positive end-expiratory pressure.
Huang CC; Fu JY; Hu HC; Kao KC; Chen NH; Hsieh MJ; Tsai YH
Crit Care Med; 2008 Oct; 36(10):2810-6. PubMed ID: 18766099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The ability of pulse pressure variations obtained with CNAP™ device to predict fluid responsiveness in the operating room.
Biais M; Stecken L; Ottolenghi L; Roullet S; Quinart A; Masson F; Sztark F
Anesth Analg; 2011 Sep; 113(3):523-8. PubMed ID: 21642606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An increase in aortic blood flow after an infusion of 100 ml colloid over 1 minute can predict fluid responsiveness: the mini-fluid challenge study.
Muller L; Toumi M; Bousquet PJ; Riu-Poulenc B; Louart G; Candela D; Zoric L; Suehs C; de La Coussaye JE; Molinari N; Lefrant JY;
Anesthesiology; 2011 Sep; 115(3):541-7. PubMed ID: 21792056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy of stroke volume variation compared with pleth variability index to predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients undergoing major surgery.
Zimmermann M; Feibicke T; Keyl C; Prasser C; Moritz S; Graf BM; Wiesenack C
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2010 Jun; 27(6):555-61. PubMed ID: 20035228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of stroke volume variations obtained with the pressure recording analytic method.
Biais M; Cottenceau V; Stecken L; Jean M; Ottolenghi L; Roullet S; Quinart A; Sztark F
Crit Care Med; 2012 Apr; 40(4):1186-91. PubMed ID: 22425817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prediction of fluid responsiveness in septic shock patients: comparing stroke volume variation by FloTrac/Vigileo and automated pulse pressure variation.
Khwannimit B; Bhurayanontachai R
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2012 Feb; 29(2):64-9. PubMed ID: 21946822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dynamic variables and fluid responsiveness in patients for aortic stenosis surgery.
Høiseth LØ; Hoff IE; Hagen OA; Landsverk SA; Kirkebøen KA
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2014 Aug; 58(7):826-34. PubMed ID: 24773498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Arm occlusion pressure is a useful predictor of an increase in cardiac output after fluid loading following cardiac surgery.
Geerts BF; Maas J; de Wilde RB; Aarts LP; Jansen JR
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2011 Nov; 28(11):802-6. PubMed ID: 21799416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Predicting fluid responsiveness during infrarenal aortic cross-clamping in pigs.
Biais M; Calderon J; Pernot M; Barandon L; Couffinhal T; Ouattara A; Sztark F
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2013 Dec; 27(6):1101-7. PubMed ID: 24060469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Pulse Pressure Variation Adjusted by Respiratory Changes in Pleural Pressure, Rather Than by Tidal Volume, Reliably Predicts Fluid Responsiveness in Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.
Liu Y; Wei LQ; Li GQ; Yu X; Li GF; Li YM
Crit Care Med; 2016 Feb; 44(2):342-51. PubMed ID: 26457754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Pulse pressure variation predicts fluid responsiveness in elderly patients after coronary artery bypass graft surgery.
Yazigi A; Khoury E; Hlais S; Madi-Jebara S; Haddad F; Hayek G; Jabbour K
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2012 Jun; 26(3):387-90. PubMed ID: 22100211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Changes in Pulse Pressure Variation or Stroke Volume Variation After a "Tidal Volume Challenge" Reliably Predict Fluid Responsiveness During Low Tidal Volume Ventilation.
Myatra SN; Prabu NR; Divatia JV; Monnet X; Kulkarni AP; Teboul JL
Crit Care Med; 2017 Mar; 45(3):415-421. PubMed ID: 27922879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Stroke volume variation does not predict fluid responsiveness in patients with septic shock on pressure support ventilation.
Perner A; Faber T
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2006 Oct; 50(9):1068-73. PubMed ID: 16939480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Changes in end-tidal carbon dioxide and volumetric carbon dioxide as predictors of volume responsiveness in hemodynamically unstable patients.
Young A; Marik PE; Sibole S; Grooms D; Levitov A
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2013 Aug; 27(4):681-4. PubMed ID: 23182383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment of fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated cardiac surgical patients.
Wiesenack C; Fiegl C; Keyser A; Prasser C; Keyl C
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2005 Sep; 22(9):658-65. PubMed ID: 16163911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. End-expiratory occlusion manoeuvre does not accurately predict fluid responsiveness in the operating theatre.
Guinot PG; Godart J; de Broca B; Bernard E; Lorne E; Dupont H
Br J Anaesth; 2014 Jun; 112(6):1050-4. PubMed ID: 24598390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Decrease in pulse pressure and stroke volume variations after mini-fluid challenge accurately predicts fluid responsiveness†.
Mallat J; Meddour M; Durville E; Lemyze M; Pepy F; Temime J; Vangrunderbeeck N; Tronchon L; Thevenin D; Tavernier B
Br J Anaesth; 2015 Sep; 115(3):449-56. PubMed ID: 26152341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. How can the response to volume expansion in patients with spontaneous respiratory movements be predicted?
Heenen S; De Backer D; Vincent JL
Crit Care; 2006; 10(4):R102. PubMed ID: 16846530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Predictive value of pulse pressure variation for fluid responsiveness in septic patients using lung-protective ventilation strategies.
Freitas FG; Bafi AT; Nascente AP; Assunção M; Mazza B; Azevedo LC; Machado FR
Br J Anaesth; 2013 Mar; 110(3):402-8. PubMed ID: 23161359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
