These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24773504)

  • 21. Between-sex differences in romantic jealousy: substance or spin? A qualitative analysis.
    Fussell NJ; Stollery BT
    Evol Psychol; 2012 Mar; 10(1):136-72. PubMed ID: 22833855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The effects of control of resources on magnitudes of sex differences in human mate preferences.
    Moore F; Cassidy C; Perrett DI
    Evol Psychol; 2010 Dec; 8(4):720-35. PubMed ID: 22947829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Do mate preferences influence actual mating decisions? Evidence from computer simulations and three studies of mated couples.
    Conroy-Beam D; Buss DM
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2016 Jul; 111(1):53-66. PubMed ID: 27337140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Sex differences in mate preferences revisited: do people know what they initially desire in a romantic partner?
    Eastwick PW; Finkel EJ
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2008 Feb; 94(2):245-64. PubMed ID: 18211175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The evolutionary psychology of human mating: a response to Buller's critique.
    Klasios J
    Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci; 2014 Sep; 47 Pt A():1-11. PubMed ID: 24927270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Implicit and explicit preferences for physical attractiveness in a romantic partner: a double dissociation in predictive validity.
    Eastwick PW; Eagly AH; Finkel EJ; Johnson SE
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2011 Nov; 101(5):993-1011. PubMed ID: 21767032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Factors predicting the probability of initiating sexual intercourse by context and sex.
    Grøntvedt TV; Kennair LE; Mehmetoglu M
    Scand J Psychol; 2015 Oct; 56(5):516-26. PubMed ID: 25929719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The evolutionary armistice: attachment bonds moderate the function of ovulatory cycle adaptations.
    Eastwick PW; Finkel EJ
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2012 Feb; 38(2):174-84. PubMed ID: 21933989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Sex differences in short-term mate preferences and behavioral mimicry: a semi-naturalistic experiment.
    van Straaten I; Engels RC; Finkenauer C; Holland RW
    Arch Sex Behav; 2008 Dec; 37(6):902-11. PubMed ID: 17682936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Post sex affectionate exchanges promote sexual and relationship satisfaction.
    Muise A; Giang E; Impett EA
    Arch Sex Behav; 2014 Oct; 43(7):1391-402. PubMed ID: 24777441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Relational Motives Reduce Attentional Adhesion to Attractive Alternatives in Heterosexual University Students in China.
    Zhang Q; Maner JK; Xu Y; Zheng Y
    Arch Sex Behav; 2017 Feb; 46(2):503-511. PubMed ID: 27173104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Self-Perceived Mate Value, Facial Attractiveness, and Mate Preferences: Do Desirable Men Want It All?
    Arnocky S
    Evol Psychol; 2018; 16(1):1474704918763271. PubMed ID: 29534596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Men's, but not women's, sociosexual orientation predicts couples' perceptions of sexually dimorphic cues in own-sex faces.
    Kandrik M; Fincher CL; Jones BC; DeBruine LM
    Arch Sex Behav; 2014 Jul; 43(5):965-71. PubMed ID: 24366658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Endorsement of Social and Personal Values Predicts the Desirability of Men and Women as Long-Term Partners.
    Lopes GS; Barbaro N; Sela Y; Jeffery AJ; Pham MN; Shackelford TK; Zeigler-Hill V
    Evol Psychol; 2017; 15(4):1474704917742384. PubMed ID: 29152995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Homosexual mating preferences from an evolutionary perspective: sexual selection theory revisited.
    Gobrogge KL; Perkins PS; Baker JH; Balcer KD; Breedlove SM; Klump KL
    Arch Sex Behav; 2007 Oct; 36(5):717-23. PubMed ID: 17674179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Informative predation: Towards a new species concept].
    Lherminier P
    C R Biol; 2018 Apr; 341(4):209-218. PubMed ID: 29606595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. When the difference is in the details: a critique of Zentner and Mitura (2012) "Stepping out of the caveman's shadow: Nations' gender gap predicts degree of sex differentiation in mate preferences".
    Schmitt DP
    Evol Psychol; 2012 Oct; 10(4):720-6. PubMed ID: 23107773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Sexual function, relationship adjustment, and the relational impact of pain in male partners of women with provoked vulvar pain.
    Smith KB; Pukall CF
    J Sex Med; 2014 May; 11(5):1283-93. PubMed ID: 24612656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Falling in love with romantic ideals: women in relationships with child molesters.
    McLaren H
    Cult Health Sex; 2016; 18(2):144-56. PubMed ID: 26305146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Intra-sex Variation in Human Mating Strategies: Different People, Different Tactics.
    Castro FN; Hattori WT; de Araújo Lopes F
    Arch Sex Behav; 2015 Aug; 44(6):1729-36. PubMed ID: 25896490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.