73 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24775574)
21. Characteristics of prostate cancer detected by digital rectal examination only.
Okotie OT; Roehl KA; Han M; Loeb S; Gashti SN; Catalona WJ
Urology; 2007 Dec; 70(6):1117-20. PubMed ID: 18158030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Screening for prostate cancer at low PSA range: the impact of digital rectal examination on tumor incidence and tumor characteristics.
Gosselaar C; Roobol MJ; Roemeling S; van der Kwast TH; Schröder FH
Prostate; 2007 Feb; 67(2):154-61. PubMed ID: 17044079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Is extended biopsy protocol justified in all patients with suspected prostate cancer?
Ojewola RW; Tijani KH; Jeje EA; Anunobi CC; Ogunjimi MA; Ezenwa EV; Ogundiniyi OS
Niger J Clin Pract; 2012; 15(3):315-9. PubMed ID: 22960968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Prostate cancer risk with positive family history, normal prostate examination findings, and PSA less than 4.0 ng/mL.
Canby-Hagino E; Hernandez J; Brand TC; Troyer DA; Higgins B; Ankerst DP; Thompson IM; Leach RJ; Parekh DJ
Urology; 2007 Oct; 70(4):748-52. PubMed ID: 17991549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The value of free and total prostate specific antigen in identifying patients for prostatic biopsy and its relationship to Gleason score and number of positive cores.
Bulbul MA; Khauli RB; Nasr R; Hemady K; Wazzan W
J Med Liban; 2000; 48(2):59-62. PubMed ID: 11028151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. PCA3 sensitivity and specificity for prostate cancer detection in patients with abnormal PSA and/or suspicious digital rectal examination. First Latin American experience.
Ramos CG; Valdevenito R; Vergara I; Anabalon P; Sanchez C; Fulla J
Urol Oncol; 2013 Nov; 31(8):1522-6. PubMed ID: 22687565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A comparative performance analysis of total prostate-specific antigen, percentage free prostate-specific antigen, prostate-specific antigen velocity and urinary prostate cancer gene 3 in the first, second and third repeat prostate biopsy.
Auprich M; Augustin H; Budäus L; Kluth L; Mannweiler S; Shariat SF; Fisch M; Graefen M; Pummer K; Chun FK
BJU Int; 2012 Jun; 109(11):1627-35. PubMed ID: 21939492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Prediction of prostate cancer for patients receiving finasteride: results from the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial.
Thompson IM; Pauler Ankerst D; Chi C; Goodman PJ; Tangen CM; Lippman SM; Lucia MS; Parnes HL; Coltman CA
J Clin Oncol; 2007 Jul; 25(21):3076-81. PubMed ID: 17634486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Clinical value of prostate specific antigen screening in early detection of prostate cancer].
Hua LX; Qiao D; Song NH; Feng NH; Yang J; Zhang JX; Chen JG; Zhang W; Sui YG; Wu HF
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2009 Sep; 31(9):705-9. PubMed ID: 20021870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Value of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) mass ratio in the detection of prostate cancer in men with PSA levels of ≤10 ng/mL.
Hong SK; Oh JJ; Byun SS; Hwang SI; Choo MS; Lee SE
BJU Int; 2012 Jul; 110(2 Pt 2):E81-5. PubMed ID: 22093144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The uncertain relationship between obesity and prostate cancer: an Italian biopsy cohort analysis.
De Nunzio C; Freedland SJ; Miano L; Finazzi Agrò E; Bañez L; Tubaro A
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2011 Dec; 37(12):1025-9. PubMed ID: 21963050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Body mass index, prostate-specific antigen, and digital rectal examination findings among participants in a prostate cancer screening clinic.
Price MM; Hamilton RJ; Robertson CN; Butts MC; Freedland SJ
Urology; 2008 May; 71(5):787-91. PubMed ID: 18267334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Contemporary prostate cancer prevalence among T1c biopsy-referred men with a prostate-specific antigen level < or = 4.0 ng per milliliter.
Ahyai SA; Graefen M; Steuber T; Haese A; Schlomm T; Walz J; Köllermann J; Briganti A; Zacharias M; Friedrich MG; Karakiewicz PI; Montorsi F; Huland H; Chun FK
Eur Urol; 2008 Apr; 53(4):750-7. PubMed ID: 17964070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Prostate cancers diagnosed at repeat biopsy are smaller and less likely to be high grade.
Tan N; Lane BR; Li J; Moussa AS; Soriano M; Jones JS
J Urol; 2008 Oct; 180(4):1325-9; discussion 1329. PubMed ID: 18707706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Detection of prostate cancer: comparison of cancer detection rates of sextant and extended ten-core biopsy protocols.
Ojewola RW; Tijani KH; Jeje EA; Anunobi CC; Ogunjimi MA; Ezenwa EV; Ogundiniyi OS
Niger Postgrad Med J; 2012 Sep; 19(3):137-42. PubMed ID: 23064168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Magnetic resonance spectroscopy imaging-directed transrectal ultrasound biopsy increases prostate cancer detection in men with prostate-specific antigen between 4-10 ng/mL and normal digital rectal examination.
Javali TD; Dwivedi DK; Kumar R; Jagannathan NR; Thulkar S; Dinda AK
Int J Urol; 2014 Mar; 21(3):257-62. PubMed ID: 23980749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Increasing aggressive prostate cancer.
Shah N; Ioffe V; Chang JC
Can J Urol; 2022 Dec; 29(6):11384-11390. PubMed ID: 36495581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Is the diagnostic yield of prostate needle biopsies affected by prostate volume?
Leibovici D; Shilo Y; Raz O; Stav K; Sandbank J; Segal M; Zisman A
Urol Oncol; 2013 Oct; 31(7):1003-5. PubMed ID: 21924650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Detection rate of prostate cancer according to prostate-specific antigen and digital rectal examination in Korean men: a nationwide multicenter study.
Seo HK; Chung MK; Ryu SB; Lee KH;
Urology; 2007 Dec; 70(6):1109-12. PubMed ID: 18158028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Prostate cancer detection rate at repeat saturation biopsy: PCPT risk calculator versus PCA3 score versus case-finding protocol.
Pepe P; Aragona F
Can J Urol; 2013 Feb; 20(1):6620-4. PubMed ID: 23433132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
