280 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24776753)
1. Minimally invasive oesophagectomy: preliminary results after introduction of an intrathoracic anastomosis.
van Workum F; van den Wildenberg FJ; Polat F; de Wilt JH; Rosman C
Dig Surg; 2014; 31(2):95-103. PubMed ID: 24776753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Anastomotic leak and stricture after hand-sewn versus linear-stapled intrathoracic oesophagogastric anastomosis: single-centre analysis of 415 oesophagectomies.
Harustiak T; Pazdro A; Snajdauf M; Stolz A; Lischke R
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2016 Jun; 49(6):1650-9. PubMed ID: 26574497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A safe and reproducible anastomotic technique for minimally invasive Ivor Lewis oesophagectomy: the circular-stapled anastomosis with the trans-oral anvil.
Campos GM; Jablons D; Brown LM; Ramirez RM; Rabl C; Theodore P
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2010 Jun; 37(6):1421-6. PubMed ID: 20153660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Anastomotic Techniques and Associated Morbidity in Total Minimally Invasive Transthoracic Esophagectomy: Results From the EsoBenchmark Database.
Schröder W; Raptis DA; Schmidt HM; Gisbertz SS; Moons J; Asti E; Luyer MDP; Hölscher AH; Schneider PM; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Nafteux P; Nilsson M; Räsanen J; Palazzo F; Mercer S; Bonavina L; Nieuwenhuijzen GAP; Wijjnhoven BPL; Pattyn P; Grimminger PP; Bruns CJ; Gutschow CA
Ann Surg; 2019 Nov; 270(5):820-826. PubMed ID: 31634181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Anastomotic leakage after intrathoracic versus cervical oesophagogastric anastomosis for oesophageal carcinoma in Chinese population: a retrospective cohort study.
Liu YJ; Fan J; He HH; Zhu SS; Chen QL; Cao RH
BMJ Open; 2018 Sep; 8(9):e021025. PubMed ID: 30181184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Modified Double-Layer Anastomosis for Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: An Effective Way to Prevent Leakage and Stricture.
Yuan Y; Zeng XX; Zhao YF; Chen LQ
World J Surg; 2017 Dec; 41(12):3164-3170. PubMed ID: 28721567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A change in clinical practice: a partially stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis reduces morbidity and improves functional outcome after esophagectomy for cancer.
Kondra J; Ong SR; Clifton J; Evans K; Finley RJ; Yee J
Dis Esophagus; 2008; 21(5):422-9. PubMed ID: 19125796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Thoracoscopic side-to-side esophagogastrostomy by use of linear stapler-a simplified technique facilitating a minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis operation.
Irino T; Tsai JA; Ericson J; Nilsson M; Lundell L; Rouvelas I
Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2016 May; 401(3):315-22. PubMed ID: 26960591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Hybrid Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer.
Allaix ME; Long JM; Patti MG
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2016 Oct; 26(10):763-767. PubMed ID: 27541591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Propensity-matched analysis of three techniques for intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomosis.
Blackmon SH; Correa AM; Wynn B; Hofstetter WL; Martin LW; Mehran RJ; Rice DC; Swisher SG; Walsh GL; Roth JA; Vaporciyan AA
Ann Thorac Surg; 2007 May; 83(5):1805-13; discussion 1813. PubMed ID: 17462404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Improved Functional Results After Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: Intrathoracic Versus Cervical Anastomosis.
van Workum F; van der Maas J; van den Wildenberg FJ; Polat F; Kouwenhoven EA; van Det MJ; Nieuwenhuijzen GA; Luyer MD; Rosman C
Ann Thorac Surg; 2017 Jan; 103(1):267-273. PubMed ID: 27677565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Minimally invasive esophagectomy: lessons learned from 104 operations.
Nguyen NT; Hinojosa MW; Smith BR; Chang KJ; Gray J; Hoyt D
Ann Surg; 2008 Dec; 248(6):1081-91. PubMed ID: 19092354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Intrathoracic versus cervical anastomosis and predictors of anastomotic leakage after oesophagectomy for cancer.
Gooszen JAH; Goense L; Gisbertz SS; Ruurda JP; van Hillegersberg R; van Berge Henegouwen MI
Br J Surg; 2018 Apr; 105(5):552-560. PubMed ID: 29412450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Completely minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy: the preliminary experience of circular-stapled anastomosis with the trans-oral anvil].
Li H; Hu B; You B; Miao JB; Fu YL; Chen QR; Wang Y
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2010 Nov; 48(22):1747-50. PubMed ID: 21211459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Major complications of minimally invasive Ivor Lewis oesophagectomy using the purse string-stapled anastomotic technique in 215 patients with oesophageal carcinoma.
Kang N; Zhang R; Ge W; Si P; Jiang M; Huang Y; Fang Y; Yao L; Wu K
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2018 Nov; 27(5):708-713. PubMed ID: 29718251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Combined laparoscopic and thoracoscopic Ivor Lewis esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: initial experience from China.
Li H; Hu B; You B; Miao JB; Fu YL; Chen QR
Chin Med J (Engl); 2012 Apr; 125(8):1376-80. PubMed ID: 22613638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comprehensive review of anastomotic technique in 432 esophagectomies.
Price TN; Nichols FC; Harmsen WS; Allen MS; Cassivi SD; Wigle DA; Shen KR; Deschamps C
Ann Thorac Surg; 2013 Apr; 95(4):1154-60; discussion 1160-1. PubMed ID: 23395626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Totally minimally invasive two-stage esophagectomy with intrathoracic hand-sewn anastomosis: short-term clinical and oncological outcomes.
Elshaer M; Gravante G; Tang CB; Jayanthi NV
Dis Esophagus; 2018 Mar; 31(3):. PubMed ID: 29293970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Quality of life in patients with esophageal carcinoma undergoing thoracoscopic and laparoscopic esophagectomy and circular stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis via retrosternal route].
Wang YB; Cai RJ; Han YJ; Wang WJ; Yang XY; Liu SE
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Jun; 14(6):428-31. PubMed ID: 21713702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Eliminating the cervical esophagogastric anastomotic leak with a side-to-side stapled anastomosis.
Orringer MB; Marshall B; Iannettoni MD
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2000 Feb; 119(2):277-88. PubMed ID: 10649203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
