BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

405 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24776911)

  • 21. Interlaboratory comparison of dicentric chromosome assay using electronically transmitted images.
    García O; Di Giorgio M; Vallerga MB; Radl A; Taja MR; Seoane A; De Luca J; Stuck Oliveira M; Valdivia P; Lamadrid AI; González JE; Romero I; Mandina T; Pantelias G; Terzoudi G; Guerrero-Carbajal C; Arceo Maldonado C; Espinoza M; Oliveros N; Martínez-López W; Di Tomaso MV; Méndez-Acuña L; Puig R; Roy L; Barquinero JF
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Apr; 154(1):18-25. PubMed ID: 22869818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Cytogenetic damage analysed by the dicentric assay.
    Romm H; Oestreicher U; Kulka U
    Ann Ist Super Sanita; 2009; 45(3):251-9. PubMed ID: 19861729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The Internet's role in a biodosimetric response to a radiation mass casualty event.
    Sugarman SL; Livingston GK; Stricklin DL; Abbott MG; Wilkins RC; Romm H; Oestreicher U; Yoshida MA; Miura T; Moquet JE; Di Giorgio M; Ferrarotto C; Gross GA; Christiansen ME; Hart CL; Christensen DM
    Health Phys; 2014 May; 106(5 Suppl 2):S65-70. PubMed ID: 24667387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Dicentric assay: inter-laboratory comparison in Indian laboratories for routine and triage applications.
    Bakkiam D; Bhavani M; Anantha Kumar AA; Sonwani S; Venkatachalam P; Sivasubramanian K; Venkatraman B
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2015 May; 99():77-85. PubMed ID: 25728004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. RENEB Inter-Laboratory Comparison 2021: The Cytokinesis-Block Micronucleus Assay.
    Vral A; Endesfelder D; Balázs J; Beinke C; Cuceu Petrenci C; Finot F; Garty G; Hadjiiska L; Hristova R; Ivanova I; Lee Y; Lumniczky K; Milanova M; Monteiro Gil O; Oestreicher U; Pajic J; Patrono C; Pham ND; Perletti G; Seong KM; Sommer S; Szatmári T; Testa A; Tichy A; Tran TM; Wilkins R; Port M; Abend M; Baeyens A
    Radiat Res; 2023 Jun; 199(6):571-582. PubMed ID: 37057983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Cytokinesis-block micronucleus assay by manual and automated scoring: calibration curves and dose prediction.
    De Sanctis S; De Amicis A; Di Cristofaro S; Franchini V; Regalbuto E; Mammana G; Lista F
    Health Phys; 2014 Jun; 106(6):745-9. PubMed ID: 24776908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Laboratory intercomparison of the cytokinesis-block micronucleus assay.
    Romm H; Barnard S; Boulay-Greene H; De Amicis A; De Sanctis S; Franco M; Herodin F; Jones A; Kulka U; Lista F; Martigne P; Moquet J; Oestreicher U; Rothkamm K; Thierens H; Valente M; Vandersickel V; Vral A; Braselmann H; Meineke V; Abend M; Beinke C
    Radiat Res; 2013 Aug; 180(2):120-8. PubMed ID: 23862731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Criticality accident dosimetry by chromosomal analysis.
    Voisin P; Roy L; Hone PA; Edwards AA; Lloyd DC; Stephan G; Romm H; Groer PG; Brame R
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 110(1-4):443-7. PubMed ID: 15353688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Evaluation of the annual Canadian biodosimetry network intercomparisons.
    Wilkins RC; Beaton-Green LA; Lachapelle S; Kutzner BC; Ferrarotto C; Chauhan V; Marro L; Livingston GK; Boulay Greene H; Flegal FN
    Int J Radiat Biol; 2015 May; 91(5):443-51. PubMed ID: 25670072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Establishing cytogenetic biodosimetry laboratory in Saudi Arabia and producing preliminary calibration curve of dicentric chromosomes as biomarker for medical dose estimation in response to radiation emergencies.
    Al-Hadyan K; Elewisy S; Moftah B; Shoukri M; Alzahrany A; Alsbeih G
    3 Biotech; 2014 Dec; 4(6):635-645. PubMed ID: 28324310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Determination of spontaneous dicentric frequencies and establishment of dose-response curves after expose of human peripheral blood lymphocytes to low- and high-dose rate
    Pham ND; Nguyen MH; Tran Q; Che QT; Nguyen VH; Phan VT; Pham VD; Ern Lee S; Vo TL
    Int J Radiat Biol; 2019 Mar; 95(3):307-313. PubMed ID: 30481092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Strategy for population triage based on dicentric analysis.
    Vaurijoux A; Gruel G; Pouzoulet F; Grégoire E; Martin C; Roch-Lefèvre S; Voisin P; Voisin P; Roy L
    Radiat Res; 2009 May; 171(5):541-8. PubMed ID: 19580489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Evaluation of spectral karyotyping (SKY) in biodosimetry for the triage situation following gamma irradiation.
    Szeles A; Joussineau S; Lewensohn R; Lagercrantz S; Larsson C
    Int J Radiat Biol; 2006 Feb; 82(2):87-96. PubMed ID: 16546907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Automated Dicentric Aberration Scoring for Triage Dose Assessment: 60Co Gamma Ray Dose-response at Different Dose Rates.
    Subramanian U; O'Brien B; McNamara M; Romanyukha L; Bolduc DL; Olsen C; Blakely WF
    Health Phys; 2020 Jul; 119(1):52-58. PubMed ID: 32483043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Interlaboratory variation in scoring dicentric chromosomes in a case of partial-body x-ray exposure: implications for biodosimetry networking and cytogenetic "triage mode" scoring.
    Ainsbury EA; Livingston GK; Abbott MG; Moquet JE; Hone PA; Jenkins MS; Christensen DM; Lloyd DC; Rothkamm K
    Radiat Res; 2009 Dec; 172(6):746-52. PubMed ID: 19929421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Estimating partial-body ionizing radiation exposure by automated cytogenetic biodosimetry.
    Shirley BC; Knoll JHM; Moquet J; Ainsbury E; Pham ND; Norton F; Wilkins RC; Rogan PK
    Int J Radiat Biol; 2020 Nov; 96(11):1492-1503. PubMed ID: 32910711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Intercomparison of conventional and QuickScan dicentric scoring for the validation of individual biodosimetry analysis in Taiwan.
    Lin WC; Chang KW; Liao TZ; Ou Yang FY; Chang TJ; Yuan MC; Wilkins RC; Chang CH
    Int J Radiat Biol; 2021; 97(7):916-925. PubMed ID: 34003708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. New tool for biological dosimetry: reevaluation and automation of the gold standard method following telomere and centromere staining.
    M'kacher R; Maalouf EE; Ricoul M; Heidingsfelder L; Laplagne E; Cuceu C; Hempel WM; Colicchio B; Dieterlen A; Sabatier L
    Mutat Res; 2014 Dec; 770():45-53. PubMed ID: 25771869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Establishing a Reference Dose-Response Calibration Curve for Dicentric Chromosome Aberrations to Assess Accidental Radiation Exposure in Saudi Arabia.
    Alsbeih GA; Al-Hadyan KS; Al-Harbi NM; Bin Judia SS; Moftah BA
    Front Public Health; 2020; 8():599194. PubMed ID: 33425838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Triage dose assessment for partial-body exposure: dicentric analysis.
    Prasanna PG; Moroni M; Pellmar TC
    Health Phys; 2010 Feb; 98(2):244-51. PubMed ID: 20065689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.