245 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24776915)
1. Comparing risk estimates following diagnostic CT radiation exposures employing different methodological approaches.
Kashcheev VV; Pryakhin EA; Menyaylo AN; Chekin SY; Ivanov VK
Health Phys; 2014 Jun; 106(6):806-11. PubMed ID: 24776915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Estimating effective dose for CT using dose-length product compared with using organ doses: consequences of adopting International Commission on Radiological Protection publication 103 or dual-energy scanning.
Christner JA; Kofler JM; McCollough CH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Apr; 194(4):881-9. PubMed ID: 20308486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Triple-rule-out computed tomography angiography with 256-slice computed tomography scanners: patient-specific assessment of radiation burden and associated cancer risk.
Perisinakis K; Seimenis I; Tzedakis A; Papadakis AE; Damilakis J
Invest Radiol; 2012 Feb; 47(2):109-15. PubMed ID: 21857528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Toward automated and personalized organ dose determination in CT examinations - A comparison of two tissue characterization models for Monte Carlo organ dose calculation with a Therapy Planning System.
Källman HE; Traneus E; Ahnesjö A
Med Phys; 2019 Feb; 46(2):1012-1023. PubMed ID: 30582891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT.
Brenner D; Elliston C; Hall E; Berdon W
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Feb; 176(2):289-96. PubMed ID: 11159059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Estimation of risk from medical radiation exposure based on effective and organ dose: how much difference is there?
Ivanov VK; Kashcheev VV; Chekin SY; Menyaylo AN; Pryakhin EA; Tsyb AF; Mettler FA
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Jul; 155(3):317-28. PubMed ID: 23390145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Estimating cancer risks to adults undergoing body CT examinations.
Huda W; He W
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Jun; 150(2):168-79. PubMed ID: 21926419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Radiation-related cancer risks in a clinical patient population undergoing cardiac CT.
Huda W; Schoepf UJ; Abro JA; Mah E; Costello P
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Feb; 196(2):W159-65. PubMed ID: 21257857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. ESTIMATION OF FEMALE RADIATION DOSES AND BREAST CANCER RISK FROM CHEST CT EXAMINATIONS.
Lahham A; ALMasri H; Kameel S
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2018 Jun; 179(4):303-309. PubMed ID: 29237054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Patient-specific radiation dose and cancer risk estimation in CT: part II. Application to patients.
Li X; Samei E; Segars WP; Sturgeon GM; Colsher JG; Toncheva G; Yoshizumi TT; Frush DP
Med Phys; 2011 Jan; 38(1):408-19. PubMed ID: 21361209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Multisection CT protocols: sex- and age-specific conversion factors used to determine effective dose from dose-length product.
Deak PD; Smal Y; Kalender WA
Radiology; 2010 Oct; 257(1):158-66. PubMed ID: 20851940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The role of Size-Specific Dose Estimate (SSDE) in patient-specific organ dose and cancer risk estimation in paediatric chest and abdominopelvic CT examinations.
Franck C; Vandevoorde C; Goethals I; Smeets P; Achten E; Verstraete K; Thierens H; Bacher K
Eur Radiol; 2016 Aug; 26(8):2646-55. PubMed ID: 26670320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Estimation and comparison of effective dose (E) in standard chest CT by organ dose measurements and dose-length-product methods and assessment of the influence of CT tube potential (energy dependency) on effective dose in a dual-source CT.
Paul J; Banckwitz R; Krauss B; Vogl TJ; Maentele W; Bauer RW
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Apr; 81(4):e507-12. PubMed ID: 21703793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of dose heterogeneity on radiation risk in medical imaging.
Samei E; Li X; Chen B; Reiman R
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Jun; 155(1):42-58. PubMed ID: 23118440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Estimated radiation risks potentially associated with full-body CT screening.
Brenner DJ; Elliston CD
Radiology; 2004 Sep; 232(3):735-8. PubMed ID: 15273333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Spine computed tomography doses and cancer induction.
Richards PJ; George J; Metelko M; Brown M
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Feb; 35(4):430-3. PubMed ID: 20081559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The cumulative risk of multiple CT exposures using two different methods.
Dijkstra H; Groen JM; Bongaerts FA; van der Jagt EJ; de Bock TG; Greuter MJ
Health Phys; 2014 Apr; 106(4):475-83. PubMed ID: 24562068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Radiation risk index for pediatric CT: a patient-derived metric.
Samei E; Tian X; Paul Segars W; Frush DP
Pediatr Radiol; 2017 Dec; 47(13):1737-1744. PubMed ID: 28856394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. 2007 recommendations of the ICRP change basis for estimation of the effective dose: what is the impact on radiation dose assessment of patient and personnel?
Boetticher Hv; Lachmund J; Looe HK; Hoffmann W; Poppe B
Rofo; 2008 May; 180(5):391-5. PubMed ID: 18438741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Conversion factors for determining organ doses received by paediatric patients in high-resolution single slice computed tomography with narrow collimation.
Seidenbusch MC; Harder D; Regulla DF; Schneider K
Z Med Phys; 2014 May; 24(2):123-37. PubMed ID: 24630933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
