These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24777489)

  • 1. Speakers' acceptance of real-time speech exchange indicates that we use auditory feedback to specify the meaning of what we say.
    Lind A; Hall L; Breidegard B; Balkenius C; Johansson P
    Psychol Sci; 2014 Jun; 25(6):1198-205. PubMed ID: 24777489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Auditory feedback of one's own voice is used for high-level semantic monitoring: the "self-comprehension" hypothesis.
    Lind A; Hall L; Breidegard B; Balkenius C; Johansson P
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2014; 8():166. PubMed ID: 24734014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An fMRI study of verbal self-monitoring: neural correlates of auditory verbal feedback.
    Fu CH; Vythelingum GN; Brammer MJ; Williams SC; Amaro E; Andrew CM; Yágüez L; van Haren NE; Matsumoto K; McGuire PK
    Cereb Cortex; 2006 Jul; 16(7):969-77. PubMed ID: 16195470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A cortical network processes auditory error signals during human speech production to maintain fluency.
    Ozker M; Doyle W; Devinsky O; Flinker A
    PLoS Biol; 2022 Feb; 20(2):e3001493. PubMed ID: 35113857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The potential link between sense of agency and output monitoring over speech.
    Sugimori E; Asai T; Tanno Y
    Conscious Cogn; 2013 Mar; 22(1):360-74. PubMed ID: 22910578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Rapid change in articulatory lip movement induced by preceding auditory feedback during production of bilabial plosives.
    Mochida T; Gomi H; Kashino M
    PLoS One; 2010 Nov; 5(11):e13866. PubMed ID: 21079783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Speaking with an alien voice: Flexible sense of agency during vocal production.
    Franken MK; Hartsuiker RJ; Johansson P; Hall L; Lind A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2021 Apr; 47(4):479-494. PubMed ID: 33492160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Functional overlap between regions involved in speech perception and in monitoring one's own voice during speech production.
    Zheng ZZ; Munhall KG; Johnsrude IS
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Aug; 22(8):1770-81. PubMed ID: 19642886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Rhythmic versus phonemic interference in delayed auditory feedback.
    Kaspar K; Rübeling H
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2011 Jun; 54(3):932-43. PubMed ID: 20966383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of delayed auditory feedback on speech kinematics in fluent speakers.
    Sasisekaran J
    Percept Mot Skills; 2012 Dec; 115(3):845-64. PubMed ID: 23409597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sensory preference in speech production revealed by simultaneous alteration of auditory and somatosensory feedback.
    Lametti DR; Nasir SM; Ostry DJ
    J Neurosci; 2012 Jul; 32(27):9351-8. PubMed ID: 22764242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Vowel category boundaries enhance cortical and behavioral responses to speech feedback alterations.
    Niziolek CA; Guenther FH
    J Neurosci; 2013 Jul; 33(29):12090-8. PubMed ID: 23864694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of gender on the N1-P2 auditory complex while listening and speaking with altered auditory feedback.
    Swink S; Stuart A
    Brain Lang; 2012 Jul; 122(1):25-33. PubMed ID: 22564750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The functional relations among motor-based prediction, sensory goals and feedback in learning non-native speech sounds: Evidence from adult Mandarin Chinese speakers with an auditory feedback masking paradigm.
    Liu X; Tian X
    Sci Rep; 2018 Aug; 8(1):11910. PubMed ID: 30093692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sense of agency over speech and proneness to auditory hallucinations: the reality-monitoring paradigm.
    Sugimori E; Asai T; Tanno Y
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Jan; 64(1):169-85. PubMed ID: 20544560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The impact of perilaryngeal vibration on the self-perception of loudness and the Lombard effect.
    Brajot FX; Nguyen D; DiGiovanni J; Gracco VL
    Exp Brain Res; 2018 Jun; 236(6):1713-1723. PubMed ID: 29623381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sensorimotor adaptation to feedback perturbations of vowel acoustics and its relation to perception.
    Villacorta VM; Perkell JS; Guenther FH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Oct; 122(4):2306-19. PubMed ID: 17902866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Opposing and following responses in sensorimotor speech control: Why responses go both ways.
    Franken MK; Acheson DJ; McQueen JM; Hagoort P; Eisner F
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Aug; 25(4):1458-1467. PubMed ID: 29869027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The sensory consequences of speaking: parametric neural cancellation during speech in auditory cortex.
    Christoffels IK; van de Ven V; Waldorp LJ; Formisano E; Schiller NO
    PLoS One; 2011; 6(5):e18307. PubMed ID: 21625532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The influence of bistable auditory feedback on speech motor control.
    Mitsuya T; Munhall KG
    Exp Brain Res; 2019 Dec; 237(12):3155-3163. PubMed ID: 31583433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.