134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24777687)
1. An efficient fractal method for detection and diagnosis of breast masses in mammograms.
Beheshti SM; AhmadiNoubari H; Fatemizadeh E; Khalili M
J Digit Imaging; 2014 Oct; 27(5):661-9. PubMed ID: 24777687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Fractal analysis of contours of breast masses in mammograms.
Rangayyan RM; Nguyen TM
J Digit Imaging; 2007 Sep; 20(3):223-37. PubMed ID: 17021926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fractal analysis of contours of breast masses in mammograms via the power spectra of their signatures.
Rangayyan RM; Oloumi F; Nguyen TM
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2010; 2010():6737-40. PubMed ID: 21095828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Feature extraction from a signature based on the turning angle function for the classification of breast tumors.
Guliato D; de Carvalho JD; Rangayyan RM; Santiago SA
J Digit Imaging; 2008 Jun; 21(2):129-44. PubMed ID: 17972137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessment of performance improvement in content-based medical image retrieval schemes using fractal dimension.
Park SC; Wang XH; Zheng B
Acad Radiol; 2009 Oct; 16(10):1171-8. PubMed ID: 19524455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Spiculation-preserving polygonal modeling of contours of breast tumors.
Guliato D; Rangayyan RM; Daloia de Carvalho J; Anchieta Santiago S
Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2006; 2006():2791-4. PubMed ID: 17945740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Polygonal modeling of contours of breast tumors with the preservation of spicules.
Guliato D; Rangayyan RM; Carvalho JD; Santiago SA
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2008 Jan; 55(1):14-20. PubMed ID: 18232342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Development of tolerant features for characterization of masses in mammograms.
Rojas-DomÃnguez A; Nandi AK
Comput Biol Med; 2009 Aug; 39(8):678-88. PubMed ID: 19524221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A completely automated CAD system for mass detection in a large mammographic database.
Bellotti R; De Carlo F; Tangaro S; Gargano G; Maggipinto G; Castellano M; Massafra R; Cascio D; Fauci F; Magro R; Raso G; Lauria A; Forni G; Bagnasco S; Cerello P; Zanon E; Cheran SC; Lopez Torres E; Bottigli U; Masala GL; Oliva P; Retico A; Fantacci ME; Cataldo R; De Mitri I; De Nunzio G
Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):3066-75. PubMed ID: 16964885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Application of fractal analysis to mammography.
Raguso G; Ancona A; Chieppa L; L'abbate S; Pepe ML; Mangieri F; De Palo M; Rangayyan RM
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2010; 2010():3182-5. PubMed ID: 21096599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Boundary modelling and shape analysis methods for classification of mammographic masses.
Rangayyan RM; Mudigonda NR; Desautels JE
Med Biol Eng Comput; 2000 Sep; 38(5):487-96. PubMed ID: 11094803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Detection of breast masses in mammograms by density slicing and texture flow-field analysis.
Mudigonda NR; Rangayyan RM; Desautels JE
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 Dec; 20(12):1215-27. PubMed ID: 11811822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Automated detection of breast mass spiculation levels and evaluation of scheme performance.
Jiang L; Song E; Xu X; Ma G; Zheng B
Acad Radiol; 2008 Dec; 15(12):1534-44. PubMed ID: 19000870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Use of border information in the classification of mammographic masses.
Varela C; Timp S; Karssemeijer N
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Jan; 51(2):425-41. PubMed ID: 16394348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Characterization and classification of tumor lesions using computerized fractal-based texture analysis and support vector machines in digital mammograms.
Guo Q; Shao J; Ruiz VF
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2009 Jan; 4(1):11-25. PubMed ID: 20033598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Characterization of masses in digital breast tomosynthesis: comparison of machine learning in projection views and reconstructed slices.
Chan HP; Wu YT; Sahiner B; Wei J; Helvie MA; Zhang Y; Moore RH; Kopans DB; Hadjiiski L; Way T
Med Phys; 2010 Jul; 37(7):3576-86. PubMed ID: 20831065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Radiomics based detection and characterization of suspicious lesions on full field digital mammograms.
Sapate SG; Mahajan A; Talbar SN; Sable N; Desai S; Thakur M
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Sep; 163():1-20. PubMed ID: 30119844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A model-based framework for the detection of spiculated masses on mammography.
Sampat MP; Bovik AC; Whitman GJ; Markey MK
Med Phys; 2008 May; 35(5):2110-23. PubMed ID: 18561687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Neighborhood Structural Similarity Mapping for the Classification of Masses in Mammograms.
Rabidas R; Midya A; Chakraborty J
IEEE J Biomed Health Inform; 2018 May; 22(3):826-834. PubMed ID: 28622679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An evaluation of contrast enhancement techniques for mammographic breast masses.
Singh S; Bovis K
IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed; 2005 Mar; 9(1):109-19. PubMed ID: 15787013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
