These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

307 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24777711)

  • 1. A design-by-treatment interaction model for network meta-analysis with random inconsistency effects.
    Jackson D; Barrett JK; Rice S; White IR; Higgins JP
    Stat Med; 2014 Sep; 33(21):3639-54. PubMed ID: 24777711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Extending DerSimonian and Laird's methodology to perform network meta-analyses with random inconsistency effects.
    Jackson D; Law M; Barrett JK; Turner R; Higgins JP; Salanti G; White IR
    Stat Med; 2016 Mar; 35(6):819-39. PubMed ID: 26423209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Using Generalized Linear Mixed Models to Evaluate Inconsistency within a Network Meta-Analysis.
    Tu YK
    Value Health; 2015 Dec; 18(8):1120-5. PubMed ID: 26686799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Consistency and inconsistency in network meta-analysis: concepts and models for multi-arm studies.
    Higgins JP; Jackson D; Barrett JK; Lu G; Ades AE; White IR
    Res Synth Methods; 2012 Jun; 3(2):98-110. PubMed ID: 26062084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A design-by-treatment interaction model for network meta-analysis and meta-regression with integrated nested Laplace approximations.
    Günhan BK; Friede T; Held L
    Res Synth Methods; 2018 Jun; 9(2):179-194. PubMed ID: 29193801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Paule-Mandel estimators for network meta-analysis with random inconsistency effects.
    Jackson D; Veroniki AA; Law M; Tricco AC; Baker R
    Res Synth Methods; 2017 Dec; 8(4):416-434. PubMed ID: 28585257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A matrix-based method of moments for fitting multivariate network meta-analysis models with multiple outcomes and random inconsistency effects.
    Jackson D; Bujkiewicz S; Law M; Riley RD; White IR
    Biometrics; 2018 Jun; 74(2):548-556. PubMed ID: 28806485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hierarchical Bayesian approaches for detecting inconsistency in network meta-analysis.
    Zhao H; Hodges JS; Ma H; Jiang Q; Carlin BP
    Stat Med; 2016 Sep; 35(20):3524-36. PubMed ID: 27037506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluating network meta-analysis and inconsistency using arm-parameterized model in structural equation modeling.
    Shih MC; Tu YK
    Res Synth Methods; 2019 Jun; 10(2):240-254. PubMed ID: 30834677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Two new methods to fit models for network meta-analysis with random inconsistency effects.
    Law M; Jackson D; Turner R; Rhodes K; Viechtbauer W
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Jul; 16():87. PubMed ID: 27465416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Node-Splitting Generalized Linear Mixed Models for Evaluation of Inconsistency in Network Meta-Analysis.
    Yu-Kang T
    Value Health; 2016 Dec; 19(8):957-963. PubMed ID: 27987646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Empirical evidence about inconsistency among studies in a pair-wise meta-analysis.
    Rhodes KM; Turner RM; Higgins JP
    Res Synth Methods; 2016 Dec; 7(4):346-370. PubMed ID: 26679486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Network meta-analysis for indirect treatment comparisons.
    Lumley T
    Stat Med; 2002 Aug; 21(16):2313-24. PubMed ID: 12210616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of inconsistency in networks of interventions.
    Veroniki AA; Vasiliadis HS; Higgins JP; Salanti G
    Int J Epidemiol; 2013 Feb; 42(1):332-45. PubMed ID: 23508418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bayesian hierarchical models for network meta-analysis incorporating nonignorable missingness.
    Zhang J; Chu H; Hong H; Virnig BA; Carlin BP
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Oct; 26(5):2227-2243. PubMed ID: 26220535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. RETRACTED: Effectiveness of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for the treatment of pain in knee and hip osteoarthritis: a network meta-analysis.
    da Costa BR; Reichenbach S; Keller N; Nartey L; Wandel S; Jüni P; Trelle S
    Lancet; 2016 May; 387(10033):2093-2105. PubMed ID: 26997557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Automated generation of node-splitting models for assessment of inconsistency in network meta-analysis.
    van Valkenhoef G; Dias S; Ades AE; Welton NJ
    Res Synth Methods; 2016 Mar; 7(1):80-93. PubMed ID: 26461181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Bayesian missing data framework for generalized multiple outcome mixed treatment comparisons.
    Hong H; Chu H; Zhang J; Carlin BP
    Res Synth Methods; 2016 Mar; 7(1):6-22. PubMed ID: 26536149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Two new approaches for the visualisation of models for network meta-analysis.
    Law M; Alam N; Veroniki AA; Yu Y; Jackson D
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Mar; 19(1):61. PubMed ID: 30885133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quantifying the impact of between-study heterogeneity in multivariate meta-analyses.
    Jackson D; White IR; Riley RD
    Stat Med; 2012 Dec; 31(29):3805-20. PubMed ID: 22763950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.