65 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24778001)
1. Wikipedia vs peer-reviewed medical literature for information about the 10 most costly medical conditions.
Hasty RT; Garbalosa RC; Barbato VA; Valdes PJ; Powers DW; Hernandez E; John JS; Suciu G; Qureshi F; Popa-Radu M; San Jose S; Drexler N; Patankar R; Paz JR; King CW; Gerber HN; Valladares MG; Somji AA
J Am Osteopath Assoc; 2014 May; 114(5):368-73. PubMed ID: 24778001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. References that anyone can edit: review of Wikipedia citations in peer reviewed health science literature.
Bould MD; Hladkowicz ES; Pigford AA; Ufholz LA; Postonogova T; Shin E; Boet S
BMJ; 2014 Mar; 348():g1585. PubMed ID: 24603564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Situating Wikipedia as a health information resource in various contexts: A scoping review.
Smith DA
PLoS One; 2020; 15(2):e0228786. PubMed ID: 32069322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Wikipedia: a key tool for global public health promotion.
Heilman JM; Kemmann E; Bonert M; Chatterjee A; Ragar B; Beards GM; Iberri DJ; Harvey M; Thomas B; Stomp W; Martone MF; Lodge DJ; Vondracek A; de Wolff JF; Liber C; Grover SC; Vickers TJ; Meskó B; Laurent MR
J Med Internet Res; 2011 Jan; 13(1):e14. PubMed ID: 21282098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Patient-oriented cancer information on the internet: a comparison of wikipedia and a professionally maintained database.
Rajagopalan MS; Khanna VK; Leiter Y; Stott M; Showalter TN; Dicker AP; Lawrence YR
J Oncol Pract; 2011 Sep; 7(5):319-23. PubMed ID: 22211130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Learning through Osmosis: A global Wikipedia editing course for medical students.
Guven T; Geraci C; Green J; Neist J; Gopalakrishnan M; Bhatt P; Cupino T; Azzam A
MedEdPublish (2016); 2020; 9():109. PubMed ID: 38073791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Developing an automated mechanism to identify medical articles from wikipedia for knowledge extraction.
Yu L; Yu S
Int J Med Inform; 2020 Sep; 141():104234. PubMed ID: 32693245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Impact of Topic Characteristics and Threat on Willingness to Engage with Wikipedia Articles: Insights from Laboratory Experiments.
Yenikent S; Holtz P; Kimmerle J
Front Psychol; 2017; 8():1960. PubMed ID: 29163323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Eliciting Disease Data from Wikipedia Articles.
Fairchild G; Del Valle SY; De Silva L; Segre AM
Proc Int AAAI Conf Weblogs Soc Media; 2015 May; 2015():26-33. PubMed ID: 28721308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Measuring Global Disease with Wikipedia: Success, Failure, and a Research Agenda.
Priedhorsky R; Osthus D; Daughton AR; Moran KR; Generous N; Fairchild G; Deshpande A; Del Valle SY
CSCW Conf Comput Support Coop Work; 2017; 2017():1812-1834. PubMed ID: 28782059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dental student editing of Wikipedia articles.
Nainar SMH
J Dent Educ; 2023 Dec; 87 Suppl 3():1834-1835. PubMed ID: 35748156
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Wikipedia as a highly accessed though imperfect source of knowledge on cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
Birkun AA
Clin Exp Emerg Med; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38778489
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The Launch of the Urogynecology Early Career Peer Reviewer Academy.
Brubaker L
Urogynecology (Phila); 2023 Sep; 29(9):717-718. PubMed ID: 37607307
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Wikipedia vs peer-reviewed medical literature for information about the 10 most costly medical conditions-IV.
Gurzell E
J Am Osteopath Assoc; 2014 Oct; 114(10):765-6. PubMed ID: 25288710
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Response.
Hasty RT; Garbalosa RC; Suciu G
J Am Osteopath Assoc; 2014 Oct; 114(10):766-7. PubMed ID: 25288711
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Is Wikipedia a reliable learning resource for medical students? Evaluating respiratory topics.
Azer SA
Adv Physiol Educ; 2015 Mar; 39(1):5-14. PubMed ID: 25727464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy and completeness of drug information in Wikipedia: a comparison with standard textbooks of pharmacology.
Kräenbring J; Monzon Penza T; Gutmann J; Muehlich S; Zolk O; Wojnowski L; Maas R; Engelhardt S; Sarikas A
PLoS One; 2014; 9(9):e106930. PubMed ID: 25250889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Wikipedia vs peer-reviewed medical literature for information about the 10 most costly medical conditions-III.
Chen GS; Xiong Y
J Am Osteopath Assoc; 2014 Oct; 114(10):764-5. PubMed ID: 25288709
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Wikipedia and medicine: quantifying readership, editors, and the significance of natural language.
Heilman JM; West AG
J Med Internet Res; 2015 Mar; 17(3):e62. PubMed ID: 25739399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy and readability of cardiovascular entries on Wikipedia: are they reliable learning resources for medical students?
Azer SA; AlSwaidan NM; Alshwairikh LA; AlShammari JM
BMJ Open; 2015 Oct; 5(10):e008187. PubMed ID: 26443650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
