These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24779320)

  • 1. The side-effects of the "Facebook effect": challenging Facebook's "organ donor" application.
    Peña AM
    J Clin Ethics; 2014; 25(1):65-7. PubMed ID: 24779320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Social media and organ donor registration: the Facebook effect.
    Cameron AM; Massie AB; Alexander CE; Stewart B; Montgomery RA; Benavides NR; Fleming GD; Segev DL
    Am J Transplant; 2013 Aug; 13(8):2059-65. PubMed ID: 23777475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Does organ donation legislation affect individuals' willingness to donate their own or their relative's organs? Evidence from European Union survey data.
    Mossialos E; Costa-Font J; Rudisill C
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2008 Feb; 8():48. PubMed ID: 18304341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Factors Affecting the Decision to Grant Consent for Organ Donation: A Survey of Adults in England.
    Webb G; Phillips N; Reddiford S; Neuberger J
    Transplantation; 2015 Jul; 99(7):1396-402. PubMed ID: 25675195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Public attitudes and behavior regarding organ donation.
    Manninen DL; Evans RW
    JAMA; 1985 Jun; 253(21):3111-5. PubMed ID: 3999296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of media presentations on willingness to commit to organ donation.
    Harel I; Kogut T; Pinchas M; Slovic P
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2017 May; 114(20):5159-5164. PubMed ID: 28461480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Facebook as a medium for promoting statement of intent for organ donation: 5-years of experience.
    Brzeziński M; Klikowicz P
    Ann Transplant; 2015 Mar; 20():141-6. PubMed ID: 25761524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Honoring patients' organ donation decisions when family conflict is present: Experience from a single organ procurement organization.
    Stahler PA; Weese SE; Nygaard RM; Hill MJ; Richardson CJ; Larson SM; Gunderson S; Quickel RR
    J Trauma Acute Care Surg; 2014 Oct; 77(4):555-8. PubMed ID: 25250593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. What factors influence people's decisions to register for organ donation? The results of a nominal group study.
    Irving MJ; Jan S; Tong A; Wong G; Craig JC; Chadban S; Rose J; Cass A; Allen RD; Howard K
    Transpl Int; 2014 Jun; 27(6):617-24. PubMed ID: 24617320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Web-Based Perspectives of Deemed Consent Organ Donation Legislation in Nova Scotia: Thematic Analysis of Commentary in Facebook Groups.
    Marcon AR; Wagner DN; Giles C; Isenor C
    JMIR Infodemiology; 2022; 2(2):e38242. PubMed ID: 37113450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Organ procurement organizations Internet enrollment for organ donation: abandoning informed consent.
    Woien S; Rady MY; Verheijde JL; McGregor J
    BMC Med Ethics; 2006 Dec; 7():E14. PubMed ID: 17187671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of the Motivation to Consent to and to Refuse Organ Donation Among Participants of Educational Meetings Concerning Organ Transplantation.
    Milaniak I; Wilczek-Rużyczka E; Wierzbicki K; Sadowski J; Kapelak B; Przybyłowski P
    Transplant Proc; 2016 Jun; 48(5):1332-6. PubMed ID: 27496399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A paradigm shift in the approach to families for organ donation: honoring patients' wishes versus request for permission in patients with Department of Motor Vehicles donor designations.
    Christmas AB; Mallico EJ; Burris GW; Bogart TA; Norton HJ; Sing RF
    J Trauma; 2008 Dec; 65(6):1507-9; discussion 1509-10. PubMed ID: 19077650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Transparency and accountability in mass media campaigns about organ donation: a response to Morgan and Feeley.
    Rady MY; McGregor JL; Verheijde JL
    Med Health Care Philos; 2013 Nov; 16(4):869-76. PubMed ID: 23354495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Effect of State Policies on Organ Donation and Transplantation in the United States.
    Chatterjee P; Venkataramani AS; Vijayan A; Wellen JR; Martin EG
    JAMA Intern Med; 2015 Aug; 175(8):1323-9. PubMed ID: 26030386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Can evidence-based health policy from high-income countries be applied to lower-income countries: considering barriers and facilitators to an organ donor registry in Mumbai, India.
    Vania DK; Randall GE
    Health Res Policy Syst; 2016 Jan; 14():3. PubMed ID: 26762573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Encouraging family discussion on the decision to donate organs: the role of the willingness to communicate scale.
    Smith SW; Kopfman JE; Lindsey LL; Yoo J; Morrison K
    Health Commun; 2004; 16(3):333-46. PubMed ID: 15265754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Differences in willingness to donate cadaveric organ between young donor families and adult donor families: evidence from the Hunan Province, China.
    Xie WZ; Ye QF; Liu W; Shao MJ; Wan QQ; Li CY; Luo AJ
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2013; 126(15):2830-3. PubMed ID: 23924451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The default option: Why a system of presumed consent may be effective at increasing rates of organ donation.
    Rockloff M; Hanley C
    Psychol Health Med; 2014; 19(5):580-5. PubMed ID: 24083828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impact Factors and Attitudes Toward Organ Donation Among Transplantation Patients and Their Caregivers in China.
    Zhang QX; Xie JF; Zhou JD; Xiao SS; Liu AZ; Hu GQ; Chen Y; Wang CY
    Transplant Proc; 2017 Nov; 49(9):1975-1981. PubMed ID: 29149947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.