These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24779565)

  • 1. Validity and relative validity of a novel digital approach for 24-h dietary recall in athletes.
    Baker LB; Heaton LE; Stein KW; Nuccio RP; Jeukendrup AE
    Nutr J; 2014 Apr; 13():41. PubMed ID: 24779565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy of dietary recall using the USDA five-step multiple-pass method in men: an observational validation study.
    Conway JM; Ingwersen LA; Moshfegh AJ
    J Am Diet Assoc; 2004 Apr; 104(4):595-603. PubMed ID: 15054345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessing the relative validity of a web-based self-administered 24-hour dietary recall in a Canadian adolescent's population.
    Drapeau V; Laramée C; Lafreniere J; Trottier C; Brochu C; Robitaille J; Lamarche B; Lemieux S
    Nutr J; 2024 Jun; 23(1):66. PubMed ID: 38907225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Validity of electronic diet recording nutrient estimates compared to dietitian analysis of diet records: randomized controlled trial.
    Raatz SK; Scheett AJ; Johnson LK; Jahns L
    J Med Internet Res; 2015 Jan; 17(1):e21. PubMed ID: 25604640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effectiveness of the US Department of Agriculture 5-step multiple-pass method in assessing food intake in obese and nonobese women.
    Conway JM; Ingwersen LA; Vinyard BT; Moshfegh AJ
    Am J Clin Nutr; 2003 May; 77(5):1171-8. PubMed ID: 12716668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Validity and reliability of an online self-report 24-h dietary recall method (Intake24): a doubly labelled water study and repeated-measures analysis.
    Foster E; Lee C; Imamura F; Hollidge SE; Westgate KL; Venables MC; Poliakov I; Rowland MK; Osadchiy T; Bradley JC; Simpson EL; Adamson AJ; Olivier P; Wareham N; Forouhi NG; Brage S
    J Nutr Sci; 2019; 8():e29. PubMed ID: 31501691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of an interactive 24-h recall and weighed food record for measuring energy and nutrient intakes from complementary foods among 9-10-month-old Malawian infants consuming lipid-based nutrient supplements.
    Hemsworth J; Arimond M; Kumwenda C; Rehman AM; Maleta K; Ashorn U; Keogh R; Ferguson EL
    Br J Nutr; 2018 Dec; 120(11):1262-1271. PubMed ID: 30350761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Validity and Usability of a Smartphone Image-Based Dietary Assessment App Compared to 3-Day Food Diaries in Assessing Dietary Intake Among Canadian Adults: Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Ji Y; Plourde H; Bouzo V; Kilgour RD; Cohen TR
    JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2020 Sep; 8(9):e16953. PubMed ID: 32902389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Electronic Dietary Intake Assessment (e-DIA): relative validity of a mobile phone application to measure intake of food groups.
    Rangan AM; Tieleman L; Louie JC; Tang LM; Hebden L; Roy R; Kay J; Allman-Farinelli M
    Br J Nutr; 2016 Jun; 115(12):2219-26. PubMed ID: 27121045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dietary Intake Reporting Accuracy of the Bridge2U Mobile Application Food Log Compared to Control Meal and Dietary Recall Methods.
    Lemacks JL; Adams K; Lovetere A
    Nutrients; 2019 Jan; 11(1):. PubMed ID: 30669430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Relative validity and reliability of a novel diet quality assessment tool for athletes: the Athlete Diet Index.
    Capling L; Gifford JA; Beck KL; Flood VM; Halar F; Slater GJ; O'Connor HT
    Br J Nutr; 2021 Jul; 126(2):307-319. PubMed ID: 33077018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Evaluation study on a new method of dietary assessment with instant photography applied in urban pregnant women in Nanjing city].
    Jiang T; Dai Y; Miao M; Zhang Y; Song C; Wang Z
    Wei Sheng Yan Jiu; 2015 Jul; 44(4):586-92. PubMed ID: 26454956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dietary restraint and disinhibition do not affect accuracy of 24-hour recall in a multiethnic population.
    Ard JD; Desmond RA; Allison DB; Conway JM
    J Am Diet Assoc; 2006 Mar; 106(3):434-7. PubMed ID: 16503235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The validity of a web-based FFQ assessed by doubly labelled water and multiple 24-h recalls.
    Medin AC; Carlsen MH; Hambly C; Speakman JR; Strohmaier S; Andersen LF
    Br J Nutr; 2017 Dec; 118(12):1106-1117. PubMed ID: 29202890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Relative Validity and Reproducibility of an Interviewer Administered 14-Item FFQ to Estimate Flavonoid Intake Among Older Adults with Mild-Moderate Dementia.
    Kent K; Charlton K
    J Nutr Gerontol Geriatr; 2017; 36(2-3):134-147. PubMed ID: 28535111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Relative Validity of MijnEetmeter: A Food Diary App for Self-Monitoring of Dietary Intake.
    Ocké M; Dinnissen C; Stafleu A; de Vries J; van Rossum C
    Nutrients; 2021 Mar; 13(4):. PubMed ID: 33808209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accuracy of a PDA-based dietary assessment program.
    Beasley J; Riley WT; Jean-Mary J
    Nutrition; 2005 Jun; 21(6):672-7. PubMed ID: 15925290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Validation of a quantitative food frequency questionnaire for Inuit population in Nunavut, Canada.
    Pakseresht M; Sharma S
    J Hum Nutr Diet; 2010 Oct; 23 Suppl 1():67-74. PubMed ID: 21158964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Development of a hand-held personal digital assistant-based food diary with food photographs for Japanese subjects.
    Fukuo W; Yoshiuchi K; Ohashi K; Togashi H; Sekine R; Kikuchi H; Sakamoto N; Inada S; Sato F; Kadowaki T; Akabayashi A
    J Am Diet Assoc; 2009 Jul; 109(7):1232-6. PubMed ID: 19559141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Agreement between an online dietary assessment tool (myfood24) and an interviewer-administered 24-h dietary recall in British adolescents aged 11-18 years.
    Albar SA; Alwan NA; Evans CE; Greenwood DC; Cade JE
    Br J Nutr; 2016 May; 115(9):1678-86. PubMed ID: 26975650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.