125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24779616)
1. Effects-based chemical category approach for prioritization of low affinity estrogenic chemicals.
Hornung MW; Tapper MA; Denny JS; Kolanczyk RC; Sheedy BR; Hartig PC; Aladjov H; Henry TR; Schmieder PK
SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2014; 25(4):289-323. PubMed ID: 24779616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A rule-based expert system for chemical prioritization using effects-based chemical categories.
Schmieder PK; Kolanczyk RC; Hornung MW; Tapper MA; Denny JS; Sheedy BR; Aladjov H
SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2014; 25(4):253-87. PubMed ID: 24779615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Binary classification of a large collection of environmental chemicals from estrogen receptor assays by quantitative structure-activity relationship and machine learning methods.
Zang Q; Rotroff DM; Judson RS
J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Dec; 53(12):3244-61. PubMed ID: 24279462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Development of QSAR models for predicting the binding affinity of endocrine disrupting chemicals to eight fish estrogen receptor.
He J; Peng T; Yang X; Liu H
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2018 Feb; 148():211-219. PubMed ID: 29055205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. QSAR prediction of estrogen activity for a large set of diverse chemicals under the guidance of OECD principles.
Liu H; Papa E; Gramatica P
Chem Res Toxicol; 2006 Nov; 19(11):1540-8. PubMed ID: 17112243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessing the chemical-induced estrogenicity using in silico and in vitro methods.
Goya-Jorge E; Amber M; Gozalbes R; Connolly L; Barigye SJ
Environ Toxicol Pharmacol; 2021 Oct; 87():103688. PubMed ID: 34119701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Use of trout liver slices to enhance mechanistic interpretation of estrogen receptor binding for cost-effective prioritization of chemicals within large inventories.
Schmieder PK; Tapper MA; Denny JS; Kolanczyk RC; Sheedy BR; Henry TR; Veith GD
Environ Sci Technol; 2004 Dec; 38(23):6333-42. PubMed ID: 15597890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation and QSAR modeling on multiple endpoints of estrogen activity based on different bioassays.
Liu H; Papa E; Gramatica P
Chemosphere; 2008 Feb; 70(10):1889-97. PubMed ID: 17884132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Performance of the flow cytometric E-screen assay in screening estrogenicity of pure compounds and environmental samples.
Vanparys C; Depiereux S; Nadzialek S; Robbens J; Blust R; Kestemont P; De Coen W
Sci Total Environ; 2010 Sep; 408(20):4451-60. PubMed ID: 20633926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prediction of Estrogenic Bioactivity of Environmental Chemical Metabolites.
Pinto CL; Mansouri K; Judson R; Browne P
Chem Res Toxicol; 2016 Sep; 29(9):1410-27. PubMed ID: 27509301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An integrated "4-phase" approach for setting endocrine disruption screening priorities--phase I and II predictions of estrogen receptor binding affinity.
Shi L; Tong W; Fang H; Xie Q; Hong H; Perkins R; Wu J; Tu M; Blair RM; Branham WS; Waller C; Walker J; Sheehan DM
SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2002 Mar; 13(1):69-88. PubMed ID: 12074393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. In silico screening of estrogen-like chemicals based on different nonlinear classification models.
Liu H; Papa E; Walker JD; Gramatica P
J Mol Graph Model; 2007 Jul; 26(1):135-44. PubMed ID: 17293141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. EADB: an estrogenic activity database for assessing potential endocrine activity.
Shen J; Xu L; Fang H; Richard AM; Bray JD; Judson RS; Zhou G; Colatsky TJ; Aungst JL; Teng C; Harris SC; Ge W; Dai SY; Su Z; Jacobs AC; Harrouk W; Perkins R; Tong W; Hong H
Toxicol Sci; 2013 Oct; 135(2):277-91. PubMed ID: 23897986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pesticides as estrogen disruptors: QSAR for selective ERα and ERβ binding of pesticides.
Agatonovic-Kustrin S; Alexander M; Morton DW; Turner JV
Comb Chem High Throughput Screen; 2011 Feb; 14(2):85-92. PubMed ID: 20958252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Currently used pesticides and their mixtures affect the function of sex hormone receptors and aromatase enzyme activity.
Kjeldsen LS; Ghisari M; Bonefeld-Jørgensen EC
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2013 Oct; 272(2):453-64. PubMed ID: 23871939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Identification of active and inactive agonists/antagonists of estrogen receptor based on Tox21 10K compound library: Binomial analysis and structure alert.
Wang J; Huang Y; Wang S; Yang Y; He J; Li C; Zhao YH; Martyniuk CJ
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2021 May; 214():112114. PubMed ID: 33711575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Oral p-tert-octylphenol exposures induce minimal toxic or estrogenic effects in adult female Sprague-Dawley rats.
Sahambi SK; Pelland A; Cooke GM; Schrader T; Tardif R; Charbonneau M; Krishnan K; Haddad S; Cyr DG; Devine PJ
J Toxicol Environ Health A; 2010; 73(9):607-22. PubMed ID: 20391140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. QSAR and mechanistic interpretation of estrogen receptor binding.
Serafimova R; Todorov M; Nedelcheva D; Pavlov T; Akahori Y; Nakai M; Mekenyan O
SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2007; 18(3-4):389-421. PubMed ID: 17514577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. SAR and QSAR modeling of endocrine disruptors.
Devillers J; Marchand-Geneste N; Carpy A; Porcher JM
SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2006 Aug; 17(4):393-412. PubMed ID: 16920661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The estrogen receptor of the gastropod Nucella lapillus: modulation following exposure to an estrogenic effluent?
Castro LF; Melo C; Guillot R; Mendes I; Queirós S; Lima D; Reis-Henriques MA; Santos MM
Aquat Toxicol; 2007 Oct; 84(4):465-8. PubMed ID: 17727972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
