These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24779954)

  • 21. Photoelastic stress analysis of different designs of cement-retained fixed partial dentures on Morse taper oral implants.
    Menani LR; Tiossi R; de Torres ÉM; Ribeiro RF; de Almeida RP
    J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Mar; 22(2):674-8. PubMed ID: 21415635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Bone adaptation induced by non-passively fitting implant superstructures: a finite element analysis based on in vivo strain measurements.
    Winter W; Taylor TD; Karl M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(6):1288-95. PubMed ID: 22167435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Photoelastic analysis of stress distribution with different implant systems.
    Pellizzer EP; Carli RI; Falcón-Antenucci RM; Verri FR; Goiato MC; Villa LM
    J Oral Implantol; 2014 Apr; 40(2):117-22. PubMed ID: 22208909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effects of implant diameter, insertion depth, and loading angle on stress/strain fields in implant/jawbone systems: finite element analysis.
    Qian L; Todo M; Matsushita Y; Koyano K
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):877-86. PubMed ID: 19865628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A finite element analysis of stress distribution in bone tissue surrounding uncoupled or splinted dental implants.
    Bergkvist G; Simonsson K; Rydberg K; Johansson F; Dérand T
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2008 Mar; 10(1):40-6. PubMed ID: 18254739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Validation of finite element models for strain analysis of implant-supported prostheses using digital image correlation.
    Tiossi R; Vasco MA; Lin L; Conrad HJ; Bezzon OL; Ribeiro RF; Fok AS
    Dent Mater; 2013 Jul; 29(7):788-96. PubMed ID: 23694844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. An investigation of tooth/implant-supported fixed prosthesis designs with two different stress analysis methods: an in vitro study.
    Ozçelik T; Ersoy AE
    J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(2):107-16. PubMed ID: 17362420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The dynamic natures of implant loading.
    Wang RF; Kang B; Lang LA; Razzoog ME
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Jun; 101(6):359-71. PubMed ID: 19463663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Biomechanical comparison of two different collar structured implants supporting 3-unit fixed partial denture: a 3-D FEM study.
    Meriç G; Erkmen E; Kurt A; Eser A; Ozden AU
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2012 Jan; 70(1):61-71. PubMed ID: 21732740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The use of finite element analysis to model bone-implant contact with basal implants.
    Ihde S; Goldmann T; Himmlova L; Aleksic Z
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Jul; 106(1):39-48. PubMed ID: 18439855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Role of the finite element model in dental implants.
    DeTolla DH; Andreana S; Patra A; Buhite R; Comella B
    J Oral Implantol; 2000; 26(2):77-81. PubMed ID: 11831334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A finite element analysis of tilted versus nontilted implant configurations in the edentulous maxilla.
    Bellini CM; Romeo D; Galbusera F; Agliardi E; Pietrabissa R; Zampelis A; Francetti L
    Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(2):155-7. PubMed ID: 19418861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Finite element stress analysis of dental prostheses supported by straight and angled implants.
    Cruz M; Wassall T; Toledo EM; da Silva Barra LP; Cruz S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(3):391-403. PubMed ID: 19587860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The biomechanical analysis of relative position between implant and alveolar bone: finite element method.
    Huang CC; Lan TH; Lee HE; Wang CH
    J Periodontol; 2011 Mar; 82(3):489-96. PubMed ID: 20936917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Platform switching: biomechanical evaluation using three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Tabata LF; Rocha EP; Barão VA; Assunção WG
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(3):482-91. PubMed ID: 21691594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Application of finite element analysis in implant dentistry: a review of the literature.
    Geng JP; Tan KB; Liu GR
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jun; 85(6):585-98. PubMed ID: 11404759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Bone stress analysis of various angulations of mesiodistal implants with splinted crowns in the posterior mandible: a three-dimensional finite element study.
    Lan TH; Pan CY; Lee HE; Huang HL; Wang CH
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(4):763-70. PubMed ID: 20657872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Analysis of bone-implant interaction phenomena by using a numerical approach.
    Natali AN; Pavan PG; Ruggero AL
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Feb; 17(1):67-74. PubMed ID: 16441786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Peri-implant biomechanical responses to standard, short-wide, and mini implants supporting single crowns under axial and off-axial loading (an in vitro study).
    Kheiralla LS; Younis JF
    J Oral Implantol; 2014 Feb; 40(1):42-52. PubMed ID: 22208865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of load transmission using different implant inclinations and cantilever lengths.
    Bevilacqua M; Tealdo T; Pera F; Menini M; Mossolov A; Drago C; Pera P
    Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(6):539-42. PubMed ID: 19149073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.