1279 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24780383)
1. Vaginal versus robotic hysterectomy and concomitant pelvic support surgery: a comparison of postoperative vaginal length and sexual function.
De La Cruz JF; Myers EM; Geller EJ
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(6):1010-4. PubMed ID: 24780383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. National Analysis of Perioperative Morbidity of Vaginal Versus Laparoscopic Hysterectomy at the Time of Uterosacral Ligament Suspension.
Chapman GC; Slopnick EA; Roberts K; Sheyn D; Wherley S; Mahajan ST; Pollard RR
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Feb; 28(2):275-281. PubMed ID: 32450226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Comparison outcomes of three surgical procedures in treatment of severe pelvic organ prolapse and analysis of risk factors for genital prolapse recurrence].
Hu CD; Chen YS; Yi XF; Ding JX; Feng WW; Yao LQ; Huang J; Zhang Y; Hu WG; Zhu ZL; Hua KQ
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Feb; 46(2):94-100. PubMed ID: 21426765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. RCT of vaginal extraperitoneal uterosacral ligament suspension (VEULS) with anterior mesh versus sacrocolpopexy: 4-year outcome.
Ow LL; Lim YN; Lee J; Murray C; Thomas E; Leitch A; Rosamilia A; Dwyer PL
Int Urogynecol J; 2018 Nov; 29(11):1607-1614. PubMed ID: 29961110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Sexual activity and vaginal topography in women with symptomatic pelvic floor disorders.
Edenfield AL; Levin PJ; Dieter AA; Amundsen CL; Siddiqui NY
J Sex Med; 2015 Feb; 12(2):416-23. PubMed ID: 25293781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Total pelvic floor reconstruction versus transvaginal hysterectomy for pelvic organ prolapse: a retrospective cohort.
Shi RX; Sun HT
Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol; 2014; 41(3):323-7. PubMed ID: 24992786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of vaginal mesh repair with sacrospinous vaginal colpopexy in the management of vaginal vault prolapse after hysterectomy in patients with levator ani avulsion: a randomized controlled trial.
Svabik K; Martan A; Masata J; El-Haddad R; Hubka P
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Apr; 43(4):365-71. PubMed ID: 24615948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Robotic laparoendoscopic single-site compared with robotic multi-port sacrocolpopexy for apical compartment prolapse.
Matanes E; Boulus S; Lauterbach R; Amit A; Weiner Z; Lowenstein L
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Apr; 222(4):358.e1-358.e11. PubMed ID: 31589864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Long-term experience of vaginal vault prolapse prevention at hysterectomy time by modified McCall culdoplasty or Shull suspension: Clinical, sexual and quality of life assessment after surgical intervention.
Schiavi MC; Savone D; Di Mascio D; Di Tucci C; Perniola G; Zullo MA; Muzii L; Benedetti Panici P
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2018 Apr; 223():113-118. PubMed ID: 29518641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Laparoscopic Uterosacral Ligament Hysteropexy vs Total Vaginal Hysterectomy with Uterosacral Ligament Suspension for Anterior and Apical Prolapse: Surgical Outcome and Patient Satisfaction.
Haj-Yahya R; Chill HH; Levin G; Reuveni-Salzman A; Shveiky D
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020 Jan; 27(1):88-93. PubMed ID: 30802607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sexual function after robot-assisted prolapse surgery: a prospective study.
van Zanten F; Brem C; Lenters E; Broeders IAMJ; Schraffordt Koops SE
Int Urogynecol J; 2018 Jun; 29(6):905-912. PubMed ID: 29687171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Surgical Outcomes of Paravaginal Repair After Robotic Sacrocolpopexy.
Hoke TP; Goldstein H; Saks EK; Vakili B
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018; 25(5):892-895. PubMed ID: 29371174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Impact of Sacrospinous Hysteropexy and Vaginal Hysterectomy With Suspension of the Uterosacral Ligaments on Sexual Function in Women With Uterine Prolapse: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Comparative Study.
Detollenaere RJ; Kreuwel IA; Dijkstra JR; Kluivers KB; van Eijndhoven HW
J Sex Med; 2016 Feb; 13(2):213-9. PubMed ID: 26805940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Vaginal reconstruction for the remedy of pelvic organ prolapse: the effect, influence on urinary and sexual function and quality of life in two-years follow-upPart I. Vaginal status and complications].
Čadková I; Huvar I
Ceska Gynekol; 2017; 82(6):430-435. PubMed ID: 29302975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Abdominal and vaginal pelvic support with concomitant hysterectomy for uterovaginal pelvic prolapse: a comparative systematic review and meta-analysis.
Alfahmy A; Mahran A; Conroy B; Brewka RR; Ibrahim M; Sheyn D; El-Nashar SA; Hijaz A
Int Urogynecol J; 2021 Aug; 32(8):2021-2031. PubMed ID: 34050771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of pelvic organ prolapse and sexual function after abdominal and laparoscopic hysterectomy.
Koroglu N; Aslan Cetin B; Akca A; Turan G; Temel Yuksel I; Safak Yıldırım I; Yetkin Yıldırım G
Ginekol Pol; 2018; 89(10):553-557. PubMed ID: 30393843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Anterior-apical single-incision mesh surgery (SIMS): surgical and functional outcomes at 1 year.
Lo TS; Tan YL; Cortes EF; Pue LB; Wu PY; Al-Kharabsheh A
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015 Jan; 22(1):50-6. PubMed ID: 25017520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sexual functioning before and after vaginal hysterectomy to treat pelvic organ prolapse and the effects of vaginal cuff closure techniques: a prospective randomised study.
Uçar MG; İlhan TT; Şanlıkan F; Çelik Ç
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Nov; 206():1-5. PubMed ID: 27612212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Uterosacral vault suspension (USLS) at the time of hysterectomy: laparoscopic versus vaginal approach.
Houlihan S; Kim-Fine S; Birch C; Tang S; Brennand EA
Int Urogynecol J; 2019 Apr; 30(4):611-621. PubMed ID: 30393822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Long-term effectiveness of transvaginal high uterosacral ligament suspension].
Duan L; Lu YX; Shen WJ; Liu X; Liu JX; Zhang YH; Ge J; Zhao Y; Niu K; Wang WY
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Jun; 52(6):363-368. PubMed ID: 28647957
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
