These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

321 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24780909)

  • 1. Adjusting parameters of aortic valve stenosis severity by body size.
    Minners J; Gohlke-Baerwolf C; Kaufmann BA; Bahlmann E; Gerdts E; Boman K; Chambers JB; Nienaber CA; Willenheimer R; Wachtell K; Holme I; Pedersen TR; Neumann FJ; Jander N
    Heart; 2014 Jul; 100(13):1024-30. PubMed ID: 24780909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Outcome Implication of Aortic Valve Area Normalized to Body Size in Asymptomatic Aortic Stenosis.
    Tribouilloy C; Bohbot Y; Maréchaux S; Debry N; Delpierre Q; Peltier M; Diouf M; Slama M; Messika-Zeitoun D; Rusinaru D
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Nov; 9(11):. PubMed ID: 27903539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Indexing aortic valve area by body surface area increases the prevalence of severe aortic stenosis.
    Jander N; Gohlke-Bärwolf C; Bahlmann E; Gerdts E; Boman K; Chambers JB; Egstrup K; Nienaber CA; Pedersen TR; Ray S; Rossebø AB; Willenheimer R; Kienzle RP; Wachtell K; Neumann FJ; Minners J
    Heart; 2014 Jan; 100(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 23969478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Velocity ratio predicts outcomes in patients with low gradient severe aortic stenosis and preserved EF.
    Jander N; Hochholzer W; Kaufmann BA; Bahlmann E; Gerdts E; Boman K; Chambers JB; Nienaber CA; Ray S; Rossebo A; Pedersen TR; Wachtell K; Gohlke-Bärwolf C; Neumann FJ; Minners J
    Heart; 2014 Dec; 100(24):1946-53. PubMed ID: 25217488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Discordant Grading of Aortic Stenosis Severity: Echocardiographic Predictors of Survival Benefit Associated With Aortic Valve Replacement.
    Berthelot-Richer M; Pibarot P; Capoulade R; Dumesnil JG; Dahou A; Thebault C; Le Ven F; Clavel MA
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Jul; 9(7):797-805. PubMed ID: 27209111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of aortic valve stenosis using cardiovascular magnetic resonance: comparison of an original semiautomated analysis of phase-contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance with Doppler echocardiography.
    Defrance C; Bollache E; Kachenoura N; Perdrix L; Hrynchyshyn N; Bruguière E; Redheuil A; Diebold B; Mousseaux E
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Sep; 5(5):604-12. PubMed ID: 22798520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of invasive and noninvasive assessment of aortic stenosis severity in the elderly.
    Gertz ZM; Raina A; O'Donnell W; McCauley BD; Shellenberger C; Kolansky DM; Wilensky RL; Forfia PR; Herrmann HC
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2012 Jun; 5(3):406-14. PubMed ID: 22647520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prognostic value of aortic valve area normalized to body size in native aortic stenosis.
    Gamaza Chulián S; Díaz Retamino E; Carmona García R; Serrano Muñoz B; León Jiménez J; González Estriégana S; Oneto Otero J
    Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed); 2021 Jan; 74(1):44-50. PubMed ID: 31839415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Stress echocardiography to assess stenosis severity and predict outcome in patients with paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis and preserved LVEF.
    Clavel MA; Ennezat PV; Maréchaux S; Dumesnil JG; Capoulade R; Hachicha Z; Mathieu P; Bellouin A; Bergeron S; Meimoun P; Arsenault M; Le Tourneau T; Pasquet A; Couture C; Pibarot P
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Feb; 6(2):175-83. PubMed ID: 23489531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Aortic valve area calculation in aortic stenosis by CT and Doppler echocardiography.
    Clavel MA; Malouf J; Messika-Zeitoun D; Araoz PA; Michelena HI; Enriquez-Sarano M
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Mar; 8(3):248-257. PubMed ID: 25772832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact of pressure recovery on echocardiographic assessment of asymptomatic aortic stenosis: a SEAS substudy.
    Bahlmann E; Cramariuc D; Gerdts E; Gohlke-Baerwolf C; Nienaber CA; Eriksen E; Wachtell K; Chambers J; Kuck KH; Ray S
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2010 Jun; 3(6):555-62. PubMed ID: 20541709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Aortic valve area discrepancy by Gorlin equation and Doppler echocardiography continuity equation: relationship to flow in patients with valvular aortic stenosis.
    Burwash IG; Dickinson A; Teskey RJ; Tam JW; Chan KL
    Can J Cardiol; 2000 Aug; 16(8):985-92. PubMed ID: 10978934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Doppler echocardiographic assessment of hemodynamic progression of valvular aortic stenosis over time: comparison between aortic valve resistance and valve area.
    Faggiano P; Gualeni A; Antonini-Canterin F; Rusconi C; Nicolosi G
    G Ital Cardiol; 1999 Oct; 29(10):1131-6. PubMed ID: 10546122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Echocardiographic predictors of outcomes in adults with aortic stenosis.
    Capoulade R; Le Ven F; Clavel MA; Dumesnil JG; Dahou A; Thébault C; Arsenault M; O'Connor K; Bédard É; Beaudoin J; Sénéchal M; Bernier M; Pibarot P
    Heart; 2016 Jun; 102(12):934-42. PubMed ID: 27048774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Inconsistent echocardiographic grading of aortic stenosis: is the left ventricular outflow tract important?
    Michelena HI; Margaryan E; Miller FA; Eleid M; Maalouf J; Suri R; Messika-Zeitoun D; Pellikka PA; Enriquez-Sarano M
    Heart; 2013 Jul; 99(13):921-31. PubMed ID: 23349350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients of small body size.
    Watanabe Y; Hayashida K; Lefèvre T; Chevalier B; Hovasse T; Romano M; Garot P; Farge A; Donzeau-Gouge P; Bouvier E; Cormier B; Morice MC
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Aug; 84(2):272-80. PubMed ID: 23613222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of dual-source computed tomography for the quantification of the aortic valve area in patients with aortic stenosis versus transthoracic echocardiography and invasive hemodynamic assessment.
    Ropers D; Ropers U; Marwan M; Schepis T; Pflederer T; Wechsel M; Klinghammer L; Flachskampf FA; Daniel WG; Achenbach S
    Am J Cardiol; 2009 Dec; 104(11):1561-7. PubMed ID: 19932793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prognostic Value of Aortic Valve Area by Doppler Echocardiography in Patients With Severe Asymptomatic Aortic Stenosis.
    Maréchaux S; Ringle A; Rusinaru D; Debry N; Bohbot Y; Tribouilloy C
    J Am Heart Assoc; 2016 May; 5(5):. PubMed ID: 27143354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prospective assessment of the frequency of low gradient severe aortic stenosis with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction: Critical impact of aortic flow misalignment and pressure recovery phenomenon.
    Ringle A; Castel AL; Le Goffic C; Delelis F; Binda C; Bohbot Y; Ennezat PV; Guerbaai RA; Levy F; Vincentelli A; Graux P; Tribouilloy C; Maréchaux S
    Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2018; 111(8-9):518-527. PubMed ID: 29439881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The complex nature of discordant severe calcified aortic valve disease grading: new insights from combined Doppler echocardiographic and computed tomographic study.
    Clavel MA; Messika-Zeitoun D; Pibarot P; Aggarwal SR; Malouf J; Araoz PA; Michelena HI; Cueff C; Larose E; Capoulade R; Vahanian A; Enriquez-Sarano M
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2013 Dec; 62(24):2329-38. PubMed ID: 24076528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.